I just popped in to Boots to pick up a prescription and was told by the dispenser that next time I went back I needed to remember my Insulin Passport. I asked what one was. i was told that it is a record of the insulins that I use. Doing some digging on the web, it appears to be another piece of paper that, to quote the woman from Boots "all pharmacies will soon require you to carry".
When asked why, I was told that it was to stop the provision of incorrect insulins to people because there had been audit points due to fatalities caused by incorrect provision of insulin to patients. Now call me cynical, but this really gets on my ****. *I* have to carry an extra piece of useless paper that *I* have to fill in so that some idiot in a Pharmacy who can't read a Prescription can claim that all necessary checks have been undertaken? Talk about "Cover your backside" And why pray, shouldn't I sue your **** for being stupid? In a court, ignorance is no exception. In addition of course, all prescription releases are double checked, and signed by a second person, so I'm providing a third line of defence for two stupid people who, despite years of training and a degree, are incapable of reading a prescription and acting on it correctly.
Not to mention that, I have to complete the thing in the first place, which opens up so many options for errors that I can't quite believe that this is taking place. As far as I can see this all stinks of Nanny State and cover up in NHS Pharmacy system errors, and I can't understand why more hasn't been made of the underlying issues of incompetency rather than "Leave it to the patient to cover themselves", which has been dressed up as "Patient Empowerment".
Apologies, Rant over, but really, this is just so dumb.
When asked why, I was told that it was to stop the provision of incorrect insulins to people because there had been audit points due to fatalities caused by incorrect provision of insulin to patients. Now call me cynical, but this really gets on my ****. *I* have to carry an extra piece of useless paper that *I* have to fill in so that some idiot in a Pharmacy who can't read a Prescription can claim that all necessary checks have been undertaken? Talk about "Cover your backside" And why pray, shouldn't I sue your **** for being stupid? In a court, ignorance is no exception. In addition of course, all prescription releases are double checked, and signed by a second person, so I'm providing a third line of defence for two stupid people who, despite years of training and a degree, are incapable of reading a prescription and acting on it correctly.
Not to mention that, I have to complete the thing in the first place, which opens up so many options for errors that I can't quite believe that this is taking place. As far as I can see this all stinks of Nanny State and cover up in NHS Pharmacy system errors, and I can't understand why more hasn't been made of the underlying issues of incompetency rather than "Leave it to the patient to cover themselves", which has been dressed up as "Patient Empowerment".
Apologies, Rant over, but really, this is just so dumb.