• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2026 Survey »

The New York Times Article 'The Fat Trap'

can someone translate the article into words of one syllubul or fewer please :oops:

or give me the Dummies version?
 
lucylocket61 said:
can someone translate the article into words of one syllubul or fewer please :oops:

or give me the Dummies version?
The 'John Cravens Newsround' version would do me tonight as I stayed up WAY too late last night watching the Olympic ceremony 2 hours late on Sky+ and my brain is fog today and I have a Teflon memory now-Nothing sticks!
 
Paul1976 said:
lucylocket61 said:
can someone translate the article into words of one syllubul or fewer please :oops:

or give me the Dummies version?
The 'John Cravens Newsround' version would do me tonight as I stayed up WAY too late last night watching the Olympic ceremony 2 hours late on Sky+ and my brain is fog today and I have a Teflon memory now-Nothing sticks!

John Craven's Newsround?!?!?! Showing yer age there fella.
 
lucylocket61 said:
can someone translate the article into words of one syllubul or fewer please :oops:

or give me the Dummies version?

The Dummies version:
  1. There is a hormonal response to losing large amounts of weight that puts your body into "energy conservation" mode
  2. this results in your body expending less energy during exercise
  3. and increases your appetite for calorific food
  4. resulting your body regaining any lost body fat, returning to your pre-weight-loss body composition
  5. it is possible to overcome this, and keep your weight down, but through extrondinary effort in exericse and food deprivation

This all fits in nicely with the theory that obesity is a metabolic response to malnutrition, the reason why calorie restricted diets don't work in the long term.
 
Tis a long article and one that needs digesting...

But the jest is, That your body fights back to regain the weight it lost.

If you took 2 people weighing 9 stone, one weight was a natural 9 stone, and the second perhaps had been on a diet and 9 stone was a reduction from 12 stone..

To maintain this weight the dieter would still have to eat less calories than the natural 9 stone individual... As the dieters metabolic system changes and starts working against them to regain the 3 stone they've lost.. So these changes does things likes stimulate the 'reward value' of food, increases hunger and actually slows the bodies ability to burn off calories via exercise.. And if the weight is gained back the body, it doesn't switch the metabolic system back it the it's original mode straight away but takes time, hence why often dieters end up not only gaining their original weight back, but also gaining a bit more!

To throw into the mix on all this, other research has suggest and identified several genes that pre-disposes individuals more to weight gain than others...

Exercise seems to be more important for general health than weight loss, as to burn of the same calories for a dieter compared to somebody of equivalent natural weight, you had to work a lot harder..

Some interesting and thought provoking research starting to come out lately, such as the Hunter Gather research, based on the Hadzac tribe, which suggested that humans has a predisposed amount of calories required to fuel the body for a day!
 
From the article:
If anything, the emerging science of weight loss teaches us that perhaps we should rethink our biases about people who are overweight. It is true that people who are overweight, including myself, get that way because they eat too many calories relative to what their bodies need. But a number of biological and genetic factors can play a role in determining exactly how much food is too much for any given individual. Clearly, weight loss is an intense struggle, one in which we are not fighting simply hunger or cravings for sweets, but our own bodies.

Amen!
 
jopar said:
Tis a long article and one that needs digesting...

But the jest is, That your body fights back to regain the weight it lost.

If you took 2 people weighing 9 stone, one weight was a natural 9 stone, and the second perhaps had been on a diet and 9 stone was a reduction from 12 stone..

To maintain this weight the dieter would still have to eat less calories than the natural 9 stone individual... As the dieters metabolic system changes and starts working against them to regain the 3 stone they've lost.. So these changes does things likes stimulate the 'reward value' of food, increases hunger and actually slows the bodies ability to burn off calories via exercise.. And if the weight is gained back the body, it doesn't switch the metabolic system back it the it's original mode straight away but takes time, hence why often dieters end up not only gaining their original weight back, but also gaining a bit more!

To throw into the mix on all this, other research has suggest and identified several genes that pre-disposes individuals more to weight gain than others...

Exercise seems to be more important for general health than weight loss, as to burn of the same calories for a dieter compared to somebody of equivalent natural weight, you had to work a lot harder..

Some interesting and thought provoking research starting to come out lately, such as the Hunter Gather research, based on the Hadzac tribe, which suggested that humans has a predisposed amount of calories required to fuel the body for a day!
I suppose this makes sense since for most of our evolutionary history a little extra fat was much prized and to be protected since it coulld mean the difference between life and death
 
I've read it twice and am slowly getting there.

Someone who has never had a weight problem has it much easier to maintain their weight than someone who has dieted down to the same weight as them. The dieter has to eat less calories and do more exercise. To keep the weight off there is no let up and it has to become like an obsession, forever thinking about food, keeping diaries, weighing everything, knowing the nutritional content of everything you plan to eat as you body is now in post dieting syndrome once again and is telling you, via hormones, that you are hungry.

My questions :-

Would it be possible to keep this up for the rest of one's life? Is it genetic or learned behaviour? Could it be both as I think? Why can some people maintain their desired weight without having to put too much effort in whereas others have to chart everything they eat?

Interesting article, haven't really "digested" it all yet.
 
Back
Top