borofergie
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,169
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Racism, Sexism, Homophobia
noblehead said:borofergie said:I concede that you might be able to partially cure ignorance by reading newspapers and journals
I'll take it all back that you've learnt your lesson Stephen :shock:
concede that you might be able to partially cure ignorance by reading newspapers and journals (which are in fact books), but whichever way you look at it, the vast majority of human knowledge is contained in books (either physical or virtual). That may change in the future, but for now, if you choose to ignore books then you are not maximising your educational potential, and are therefore more ignorant than you might be.
borofergie said:I also stand by my point that you are wrong to criticise a book that you haven't bothered to read. Especially on the grounds that the books in question are "controversial". I'd argue that most of the great books of our culture were regarded as "controversial" when they were published. That's what makes them great books.
Now if you'd kindly answer the point I made about Das Kapital, the Wealth of Nations and Origin of Species...
borofergie said:noblehead said:borofergie said:I concede that you might be able to partially cure ignorance by reading newspapers and journals
I'll take it all back that you've learnt your lesson Stephen :shock:
Instead of taking parts of my post out of context - why don't you answer the substantive points?
This is what I wrote...
concede that you might be able to partially cure ignorance by reading newspapers and journals (which are in fact books), but whichever way you look at it, the vast majority of human knowledge is contained in books (either physical or virtual). That may change in the future, but for now, if you choose to ignore books then you are not maximising your educational potential, and are therefore more ignorant than you might be.
noblehead said:Read the replies (not your own btw) and do see that members of the forum don't agree with you and your choice of words.
borofergie said:noblehead said:Read the replies (not your own btw) and do see that members of the forum don't agree with you and your choice of words.
Not true.
Grazer, Lucylockett, RRB and Geoff (libraising) agreed with me.
I've done you the courtesy of answering your questions, honestly and in full. Either answer the points that I've raised or concede the argument.
borofergie said:I also stand by my point that you are wrong to criticise a book that you haven't bothered to read. Especially on the grounds that the books in question are "controversial". I'd argue that most of the great books of our culture were regarded as "controversial" when they were published. That's what makes them great books.
Now if you'd kindly answer the point I made about Das Kapital, the Wealth of Nations and Origin of Species...
borofergie said:Nice. Pity it's the wrong Lucy.
borofergie said:I also stand by my point that you are wrong to criticise a book that you haven't bothered to read. Especially on the grounds that the books in question are "controversial". I'd argue that most of the great books of our culture were regarded as "controversial" when they were published. That's what makes them great books.
Now if you'd kindly answer the point I made about Das Kapital, the Wealth of Nations and Origin of Species...
If you can answer it, then answer it.
noblehead said:Off topic Stephen and lets not derail the thread and discuss your choosen Books, did you enjoy the post by Lucy?......It's a great post and proves that more than one way of learning :thumbup:
smidge said:Come on Guys - agree to disagree on this one will you?
Smidge
borofergie said:noblehead said:Read the replies (not your own btw) and do see that members of the forum don't agree with you and your choice of words.
Not true.
Grazer, Lucylockett, RRB and Geoff (libraising) agreed with me.
I've done you the courtesy of answering your questions, honestly and in full. Either answer the points that I've raised or concede the argument.
borofergie said:I didn't choose those books - society did. If you want more "controversial" books I can supply a list of hundreds.
4.
due to or showing lack of knowledge or training: an ignorant statement.
noblehead said:borofergie said:I didn't choose those books - society did. If you want more "controversial" books I can supply a list of hundreds.
I bet you could Stephen and that is why you draw the conclusion that people are ''ignorant'' if they don't read the books that you read and agree with.
To read a book like The great Cholesterol Con (going back to the original thread and the focus of discusion....cholesterol) you have to believe that the advice is flawed or doubtful, as I don't then I don't see the need to waste my time and money on something I have no interest in reading, the difference between you and I is that I wouldn't call people ''ignorant'' or any other derogatory word for not reading something that I believe in or enjoy.....that is dear boy the whole purpose of the thread!!!
Off to bed now as I have an early start, I'll wish you a restful nights sleep and will chat tomorrow lunch
anna29 said:Hi BioHaZarD.BioHaZarD said:I don't read books, I read the paper, news online, magazines, but never books. Just don't get it? I don't have the patience to read books.
Know what you mean with your points here - I know a bloke who never reads anything yet
as a nuclear medicine specialist, he hasnt the patience to read things either.
Though he leaves sky news on endlessly! It drives me mad too :crazy:
This is his way of keeping up with what is happening in the world...
Anna.
noblehead said:borofergie said:I didn't choose those books - society did. If you want more "controversial" books I can supply a list of hundreds.
I bet you could Stephen and that is why you draw the conclusion that people are ''ignorant'' if they don't read the books that you read and agree with.
noblehead said:To read a book like The great Cholesterol Con (going back to the original thread and the focus of discusion....cholesterol) you have to believe that the advice is flawed or doubtful
noblehead said:Read the replies (not your own btw) and do see that members of the forum don't agree with you and your choice of words.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?