That's an interesting point.
I did about a year of slow dieting, which did greatly improve my diabetes, but it wasn't until I finished it off on the Newcastle diet that I actually appeared to reverse my type 2.
There does appear to be some difference in how the body reacts to the differing methodology.
The op touched on this earlier.
That would be because we are already using a method which already WORKS, Low Carb Healthy Fat! I have had enough of your proselytising! I am leaving this argument...because that is what it is becoming.1. So your saying since you don't choose to use this method.. that No one else should be helped with it? That's kinda selfish..
2. Why and how you you become musclebound? Do you think people just become musclebound? Please share that with me.. last time I checked it takes years of dedicated hard work.
3.you want to not do it that's fine. I HAVE NO DOG IN THIS FIGHT..I could care less what you do with your body...my original question was why aren't people using this? I was wondering why would people not use a method that has a good chance of working..
I never said it was the best or only way.
I actually didn't say anything about it..
But these are the replies I'm getting..
It literally makes NO sense..
why are some you guys so offended.
Of course we have Pinkorchid (love your nameBTW) We were objecting to his method of disseminating it! It makes me wonder what sort of bully he is in real life!Has anyone here thought that what the OP is suggesting might work for some diabetics and get them the results they would like to have. We can't say it won't work because we simply do not know that
Noted that this forum has a history of one topic wonders who claim some form of absolute knowledge.
Usually they go away after a while.
I am able to eat what I want now .. but like a broken nose .. it is possible to happen again ... and if it returns then I am better prepared to sorting out this time ... broken nose and T2 ..
Noted that this forum has a history of one topic wonders who claim some form of absolute knowledge.
Usually they go away after a while.
Or realise diabetes is for life not just for xmas!Noted that this forum has a history of one topic wonders who claim some form of absolute knowledge.
Usually they go away after a while.
You may not feel superior, but the OP certainly does. I have no argument with you (this time) douglas lol, just the OP's claim that he has found the cure for all of us.
Yes, I trod on a nail once, many years ago, and had to get it pulled out in a&e.
My foot is now only in 'remission' according to some, if I tread on a nail again, it'll still go back in.
The sort of bully who sees you drop a tenner, runs up to give it you back, and you tell him it couldn't possibly be yours, because you couldn't be that careless, and how very dare he suggest it?
Please show where I made any claims?
I asked a question.. I don't understand where you came with this superiority thing.. I haven't said anything to provoke you or yoj
Thank you for this comment..
I came across something that I thought would possibly help somebody and had some thoughts on maybe making it work better..
For the most part I've been called names.. for asking a question.
I believe the way people view things is a true reflection of themselves..
Why would anyone "feel superior" and how would I be a bully by asking a straight forward question..
I never made any claims nor did I speak badly of anyone.
I see a some believe that since they feel (without actually doing the diet) that it won't work for them ... so In thier opionin NOBODY should be made aware. In that same line of thought since you can't excerise , don't tell people exercise helps, either.. and if anything new comes out don't share it casue it doesn't help your particular case.. I will never understand that mindset..
There is a crisis in this country with diabetes on the rise and although SOME may have really complicated hormonal cases. I believe the majority doesn't. And in my eyes if ANYONE can be helped by this method I believe it should be made more public.
Anyway a couple points I wouldn't like to add..
From my understanding it wasn't the actually weight loss but the SUDDEN lack of calories that triggered the body.
They claimed that during the first week bg levels went back to normal. I'm sure weight loss helps mainly removing visceral fat. But also the sudden drop in calories has something to do with it.. as stated in the study..
This is something that should be investigated further imho. Also the possible effects of autophagy.
I've also read A case about a man who did this diet for 11 days.. he was slender to start.. and had to drop down 11stone to 8 stone 13lbs (Seems scary for a guy)but this method has worked for him as well..
To clear up any misconceptions
Am I saying this is the only way? NO.
Never did.
am I saying the research showed it to be effective? YES
Am I saying it need to be revised and made more public?Absolutely.
The human body is remarkable machine built to survive.. don't ever forget that..
I know for me, I have PCOS and iI am extremely insulin resistant. And with that I gained a lot of weight. With the high fat low carb eating it has made it much easier to lose weight and become much more sensitive to insulin. The more weight I loose the better my BG is. With every ten pounds I loose I have come down .5 in my FBG. 50 pounds so far.It would be interesting to poll who had done the diet, who has done variants, ie, food rather than shakes, low carb rather than original 'carby' shakes, added fat, increased calorie versions, longer slower weight loss, etc, and see what the results have been for each group though.
We'd have enough members on this forum to put that to bed.
Please show where I made any claims?
I asked a question.. I don't understand where you came with this superiority thing.. I haven't said anything to provoke you or yoj
Thank you for this comment..
I came across something that I thought would possibly help somebody and had some thoughts on maybe making it work better..
For the most part I've been called names.. for asking a question.
I believe the way people view things is a true reflection of themselves..
Why would anyone "feel superior" and how would I be a bully by asking a straight forward question..
I never made any claims nor did I speak badly of anyone.
I see a some believe that since they feel (without actually doing the diet) that it won't work for them ... so In thier opionin NOBODY should be made aware. In that same line of thought since you can't excerise , don't tell people exercise helps, either.. and if anything new comes out don't share it casue it doesn't help your particular case.. I will never understand that mindset..
There is a crisis in this country with diabetes on the rise and although SOME may have really complicated hormonal cases. I believe the majority doesn't. And in my eyes if ANYONE can be helped by this method I believe it should be made more public.
Anyway a couple points I wouldn't like to add..
From my understanding it wasn't the actually weight loss but the SUDDEN lack of calories that triggered the body.
They claimed that during the first week bg levels went back to normal. I'm sure weight loss helps mainly removing visceral fat. But also the sudden drop in calories has something to do with it.. as stated in the study..
This is something that should be investigated further imho. Also the possible effects of autophagy.
I've also read A case about a man who did this diet for 11 days.. he was slender to start.. and had to drop down 11stone to 8 stone 13lbs (Seems scary for a guy)but this method has worked for him as well..
To clear up any misconceptions
Am I saying this is the only way? NO.
Never did.
am I saying the research showed it to be effective? YES
Am I saying it need to be revised and made more public?Absolutely.
The human body is remarkable machine built to survive.. don't ever forget that..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?