has this scientific trial been discussed yet here :
"Visceral adiposity and metabolic syndrome after very high–fat and low-fat isocaloric diets: a randomized controlled trial1"
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/early/2016/11/30/ajcn.115.123463.abstract?papetoc
a Norwegian trial of two diets with 60 participating men of a BMI higher than 29 ...where one diets was high in carbs low in fat , and the another diet very high in fat low in carbs, seems to find that the one (VHFLC) do raise HDL and the other (LFHC) lowers LDL , but did not differentially influence visceral fat and metabolic syndrome in a low-processed, lower-glycemic dietary context...
I find it interesting that one seems to be able by different choice of diet to choose if one wants to lower LDL or if one wants to highten HDL ... thats news
but that those very different diets did no difference in helping metabolic syndrome is a big surprise I think
what do you think of this trial and those results ?
"Visceral adiposity and metabolic syndrome after very high–fat and low-fat isocaloric diets: a randomized controlled trial1"
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/early/2016/11/30/ajcn.115.123463.abstract?papetoc
a Norwegian trial of two diets with 60 participating men of a BMI higher than 29 ...where one diets was high in carbs low in fat , and the another diet very high in fat low in carbs, seems to find that the one (VHFLC) do raise HDL and the other (LFHC) lowers LDL , but did not differentially influence visceral fat and metabolic syndrome in a low-processed, lower-glycemic dietary context...
I find it interesting that one seems to be able by different choice of diet to choose if one wants to lower LDL or if one wants to highten HDL ... thats news
but that those very different diets did no difference in helping metabolic syndrome is a big surprise I think
what do you think of this trial and those results ?
Last edited: