Who knew there were so many thin type 2s?
Daibell makes a very good point. If your are consuming 2000 calories a day you should not be losing weight, even if you are low carbing. That could be Type 1 developing.
Check your calorie intake, if it's normal take the information to your doctor. Otherwise she may just assume you are under-eating.
I would suggest calories are not always a means of evaluating "eating enough".
I am 160cm tall, weigh 48kg and my average calorific consumption a day is 2000 - 2500, to maintain weight, so bearing in mind the OP is also eating an LC diet, and taller than I, it's not altogether out of the ordinary, either way - in my view. It's a looooong time since I paid too much attention to calories.
In order to gain weight, after surgery, I was eating in excess of 3000 and it still took a few months to halt the loss and gain the couple of kilos I had lost.
In my personal experience calories as a bit of a smoke screen when LCing.
That said, as @Diabell suggests, the possibility of slow onset T1 or LADA should be borne in mind if upping the protein and fat doesn't do the trick.
I must be one of the lucky ones. I found myself losing too much weight when I started LCHF but it grew more rapid when I actually switched into keto mode. I found that I could contol my weight by just upping my fat intake, and kept it stable Recently I relaxed the fat intake since too much of my purchases were disapearing overnight down my OH throat _(who is 20 stone and high carbing) and I lost weight again. I have now padlocked the fridge, and have put on weight again,Yup, I agree.
Just two small comments - firstly, it is my understanding that uncontrolled weight loss in T1s and LADAs is linked to high blood glucose (when the glucose is peed out by the kidneys), so unless the blood glucose is high enough (at least over 10mmol/l) then that is unlikely to be happening.
And secondly, I think I am very, very jealous @AndBreathe. I completely believe that you struggle to gain on 3000 calories, but to need to eat nearly that much to avoid losing... well... there is no justice in life, is there?
(my experience is that calories don't matter, and I CAN eat plenty of them, provided that I cut my carbs back to extreme levels. But I suspect that you don't need to be anywhere near that extreme.)
Yup, I agree.
Just two small comments - firstly, it is my understanding that uncontrolled weight loss in T1s and LADAs is linked to high blood glucose (when the glucose is peed out by the kidneys), so unless the blood glucose is high enough (at least over 10mmol/l) then that is unlikely to be happening.
And secondly, I think I am very, very jealous @AndBreathe. I completely believe that you struggle to gain on 3000 calories, but to need to eat nearly that much to avoid losing... well... there is no justice in life, is there?
(my experience is that calories don't matter, and I CAN eat plenty of them, provided that I cut my carbs back to extreme levels. But I suspect that you don't need to be anywhere near that extreme.)
The weight that carbs puts on is glycogen, which is packets of 5 glucose molecules, and loads of water. So the weight is actually water that plumps you up like a supermarket chicken. It should not be considered as a long term solution, where the best weight comes in the form of muscle. So carbs is the express way to gain weight, but its not necessarily the healthiest, Some glycogen reserves is good to protect us from hypo's under extreme conditions such as heavy exercise or starvationWhilst this is going to sound like rubbing salt into the wounds, Brunneria, by the time I had regained my meagre gain, I was sick, sick, sick of cream and cheese. I am sure though that if I ate 2000-2500 calories including the "normal carbs", I would gain weight more quickly, but I'm pretty un-fussed by bread, spuds, pasta these days.
It really is so bizarre what we become accustomed to, in terms of eating pattern.
The weight that carbs puts on is glycogen, which is packets of 5 glucose molecules, and loads of water. So the weight is actually water that plumps you up like a supermarket chicken. It should not be considered as a long term solution, where the best weight comes in the form of muscle. So carbs is the express way to gain weight, but its not necessarily the healthiest, Some glycogen reserves is good to protect us from hypo's under extreme conditions such as heavy exercise or starvation
Looking at your post again, I see you are lacto tolerant. Many have problems with dairy products, so have to use other fat sources. I find personally that too much cream (I am a virtual cat...) gives me the runs due to excess bile production, so I use avacados, and nuts and (YUK) olives. I also use a bit of coconut oil and lard in cooking. Butter is scrummy and remains on my menu at all times. But as I said above, I can control my meds and diet so I do not need to fatbomb or bulletproof my diet too much. I ride the seesaw.
Actually you misread my post. I was saying that you are able to eat dairy product,but many are not. So I was trying to cover their base as well with some alternatives,Erm,...... thanks for the lecture, but I think if you re-read my post you'll find I didn't suggest lacto-intolerance, I expressed I was very sick of eating cream, not that cream makes me sick.
Pedant? Moi? Oh yes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?