LornaFarrell
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 72
Just out of curiosity, was your consultant an older doctor? Forty years ago diabetic diagnosis was easy. All the under 30s were T1 and "thin", all the over 30s were T2 and "fat", and then there were those weird people who got diabetes during pregnancy and progressed to full time diabetes if they had too many babies.I just feel I’ve got a consultant who’s assuming that because I’m larger and previously had GD then it must be T2, I actually felt quite judged in the appointment. He managed to tell me in one breath that I’d probably given myself T2 by eating so much sugar I’d shocked my pancreas (I’d already told him I’d been following SW and loosing weight) and in the next breath said I had ketones because I “starved myself”. I’ve never starved myself in my life!
I can only agree it's a mess. I'm still listed as T2 as I gave up with my 'expert' diabetes GPs on being 'T1'. The first one didn't spot I was stick thin at diagnosis and an HBa1C of 12% and said to carry on losing weight. Many years later and on the complete set of tablets which did nothing my new diabetes GP said I was NOT T1 and definitely T2 (no tests of course) and refused me insulin. She said she was the expert. Still stick thin she said to have a 'normal balanced diet'! A year later she put me on insulin - finally. Sadly DUK (not this website) doesn't help as it has only recently even recognised LADA and is always way behind the times. NICE is getting there very slowly.My two older GPs, (I was in a different practice when I was first diagnosed), immediately took the view I was Type 2 based on my age and weight. The worst one was incredibly rude and dismissive of my tentative suggestion that I'd lost a lot of weight (at least 4 if not 5 stone at that point - definitely 4 according to medical records) with no effort what so ever and shouldn't that be investigated. I was utterly thankful I was changing practice as I'd just moved house to a different area of the city.
Three months later, having got my hbA1c from an initial 144 to 57, where it hovered nicely under a radar for 18 months or so, with a delighted DSN praising me regularly for weight loss (still no effort) and splendid control (which I wasn't satisfied with in the high 50s, but knew I was under that radar) until it began creeping up... and up... and up... and I was told by another older GP it was just progressing as I should expect as a Type 2, and I shouldn't be getting upset. But, maybe I wasn't doing enough with diet or exercise. Yes, well, once I'd asked what bit more than halving my body weight (albeit with no effort but no-one was taking any notice of that at this point) with no effort and walking 8 - 10 miles most days wasn't doing enough) that at least got retracted but I have outright refused to see that GP ever again.
Cue a few months on from that, up for a three-monthly review (I'd been put back on those because of the upward spiralling hbA1c) and the discovery my DSN had moved on. I was persuaded to have my review with a new, younger GP. I am now so thankful I did, as he took everything I said much more seriously, got treated to my record of blood sugars, (other GPs not interested) photos of the physical differences, and over-rode what he should've done in putting me on a third medication referral to the clinics as he felt I'd done everything I could, that my body had had enough and his gut instinct was there was something more unusual... and three years on I've finally got a clear diagnosis of LADA. But, it's taken time, effort and a lot of trying different things.
I'm not actually blaming the older GPs, because I did initially present as the typical older overweight Type 2 and I've learned how difficult it is to get this right. But, I am still frustrated by the attitude of those 3 GPs, all of whom were technically diabetes specialist GPs, and how prevalent those attitudes are when you're over-weight and everything is blamed on weight.
A rapid onset is often a sign of type 1.
Type 1s in honeymoon period can still produce significant c-peptides for years. After 25 years with type 1, my own levels were 0.17 which is not that far from 0.26 nmol / l which is the low end of normal range. Now they're back down to 0.051 again. So they can go up and down throughout your life, and aren't 100% conclusive. But yes, generally established type 1s have very low (or practically zero) c-peptide levels, and type 2 often have much higher but they can also destroy their beta cells from stress.
The first few years of type 1 can have relatively high levels of c-peptide but they will diminish over time. About 7 years is how long they estimate the average "honeymoon" period is now.
I'd check for antibodies. And if you have type 2 diabetes, you can and should work immediately to reduce it by cutting out all carbs from your diet. You don't need them, to my mind they're quite literally a kind of poison for your body.
You can also lose weight from being in DKA zone so be careful about that too. Check your sugars and ketones often. A1C doesn't tell the whole story, not by a long shot. There are four or five types of antibodies related to type 1, and the most serious (anti-GAD65) is reactive to many common starchy foods like grains and corn, so try to avoid foods which will make things worse (aside from their sugar content). Carbs are basically sugar, more or less. Avoid at all costs.
I agree that too many carbs lead to too much bg in the blood, which does act like a poison. How many carbs are too many does seem to vary from person to person. Personally I can only tolerate about 20g carbs daily, but there are many people posting on this Forum who can get bg readings that are much better than mine while consuming far more carbs. I agree that carbs are not necessary, but unfortunately it is the nature of food that many valuable nutrients come more or less welded to carbs. I wonder, when you advise cutting out ALL carbs, whether you realise quite how limited such a diet would be? NO vegetables, not even the famous avocados. NO sardines, as some, even those with no added sauce, come with a few carbs included. No cream, only a few brands of butter and a very few types of cheese. No eggs.And if you have type 2 diabetes, you can and should work immediately to reduce it by cutting out all carbs from your diet. You don't need them, to my mind they're quite literally a kind of poison for your body.
Absolutely. According to Dr Bernstein, more and more T1s are consuming so many carbs + so much insulin, they are becoming T2 as well as T1!!! (I have no idea if this is correct, but it is what Dr B said. Please don't shoot the messenger!)Bottom line is this: no matter what type of diabetes you have, or even if you are non-diabetic, try to avoid eating excessive carbs.
Ok maybe I went a bit overboard, "no carbs" is a bit overkill, but low-carbing (30-50g per day) is a sensible choice.
Too many ketones are also literally poison, leading to DKA and comas or death, but at least diabetics (of both types) can metabolize them if they are your primary fuel source and not caused by elevated blood sugars.
Also, and I find this hilarious and a propos, that carbs aren't even well metabolized by healthy, non-diabetics!
https://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/201...even-in-people-without-diabetes-98154217.html
Not seeing the connection between carbs and type 2 diabetes progression / diagnosis is basically ignoring news article after news article posted on this very site. I'm not attacking those with type 2 diabetes by any means, I also now think (and so do some researchers) that diet has some influence in the development of type 1 diabetes too, but it's much more complex. Virtually all the type 1 related antibody levels are aggravated and reactive to foods in western, high carb diets: grains, corn. Dairy too.
I ate tons of carbs before becoming type 1, as did my entire family. The incidence of type 1 is increasing over time too, tracking type 2 increases. How can that be if there is no correlation to diet? There are surely other hypotheses, but autoimmunity starts in the gut and food has got to be involved. Babies who get type 1 must either get it from their genes or their environment or their mother directly (enterovirus transmission, or antibodies in their bloodstream). And people here might not know this, but diet choices you make in your lifetime affect the chances of your offspring getting diabetes. They now know that phenotypical traits, not just DNA, are also transmitted genetically via RNA. This is scary, because it means if you lead an unhealthy lifestyle, your "karma" will be hurting your kids. Conversely with good habits, too.
Carbs aren't the only thing to avoid, stress is bad for sugars, over-exercise can lead to blackouts and comas (happened to me), under-exercise to further obesity and lack of insulin sensitivity.
The problem with diabetes is elevated blood sugars. Carbs elevate your blood sugars. So, maybe don't eat them? Or minimize them.
I agree with Dr Fung's approach, he knows what he's talking about and exposes the corruption that led to the conventional wisdom promoting low fat diets, which is an invention from the food industry. They have a financial incentive to make people hungry (insulin spikes after ingesting carbs) so that makes people buy more food. All the while thinking it's "healthy" to eat "no-sugar" and "low-fat" but that's barely not false advertising and basically a lie, because carbs = sugar. The same marketing people behind "smoking doesn't cause cancer, it's perfectly safe" just moved on to other rackets, in the food biz.
Bottom line is this: no matter what type of diabetes you have, or even if you are non-diabetic, try to avoid eating excessive carbs.
From my reading, it appears to me that the GAD test and most others around diabetes are pretty unreliable.Interesting... there's some poignant stuff on this thread for me and sorry to hijack .. I was "diagnosed" as type 2 after having gestational diabetes 12 years ago. However it was revisited after a recent episode in ICU with DKA the hospital. It appears the GAD test after my pregnancy wasn't actually done. It was done recently and came back as positive as well as the c-peptide test. Now I believe the DN either lied to me about the result (as she said it came back negative...distinctly remember this conversation) or the results have been lost. Or could there be another reason? Can you not have the antibodies but suddenly have them?
I am absolutely not qualified in this, but I would have thought the DKA episode was conclusive that you are not T2? (Maybe others can comment.) The important thing is to have medication and lifestyle / diet that keep your bg low (and avoid more visits to ICU.) You don't say what is happening for you now.So potentially the recent diagnosis is wrong too?!
Believe me, I do SO sympathise. Just because misdiagnosis, ignorance and even sculduggery on the part of medical staff seems to be rife, doesn't make it any easier to bear, especially when it has done us real harm. When I was (much) younger I was more trustful and just went along with what the doctors said. Nowadays I check check check every inch of the way. It would be more relaxing to assume they are getting it right, but too dangerous. I believe the vast majority wish me well, but are so often following out-dated guidelines and simplistic rules of thumb half remembered from their training X decades ago.Currently under the care of the hospital while I'm changing insulin. Was formerly on humalog and humalog I but have changed the long acting to levemir. I'm still on metformin as well but I understand from the practice nurse this might be not necessary.
I'm just peeved that the hospital potentially lied about doing the original GAD test and then decided with no foundation that I was type 2. The dka incident may not have happened and being self employed I wouldn't have had to take unpaid leave and threatened my business. But hey ho.. like you say it's in the past now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?