madusmacus
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 309
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Yes. I even felt light headed at 5.4 this morning. Some people are naturally lower I think.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
Hi Peacetrain, yeah, I look at some peoples' figures in the 3's and low 4's and wonder how they manage to function on those figures?
It's just reminded me this morning, of females trying to get to be a size zero. Is this too a progression where people want to aim for a figure in the 1's? How low can we go?
I'm happy in the 5's. That stops me fretting too much as it's an achievable figure I think, and I feel ill in the 4's. Simples.
xx
I also believe my comment could have been misconstrued as if a criticism, I'm not going to post much any more, it's pointless.Hi @AndBreathe
I hope you don't think I was being critical of those, such as yourself, whose range is often in the 4s or even lower.
The point I was trying to make was I have begun to realise everyone has their own comfort zone and low 5s seem to be mine. Any lower and I begin to feel woozy.
Reading other people's posts, including yours, made me aspire to achieve lower levels. I mistakenly thought this was what I should be achieving.
Perhaps I haven't explained myself very well here but I've realised that we are all different. I'm not very good at the science but my body does seem to know a thing of two.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
Don't be daft!I also believe my comment could have been misconstrued as if a criticism, I'm not going to post much any more, it's pointless.
Dear @AndBreathe@peacetrain and @lunarlinda - I did post in defence of my position in an attempt to explain that for some of us, those levels are where we end up; albeit after a good going effort. When I read some of the incredible efforts some people appear to make on here, with LCHF in particular, I am always astonished (in a positive way) where I have ended up. I have been strict, but I just don't have a "that'll do" gene - for anything, but I haven't had to turn my world completely upside down.
@lunarlinda - I don't believe everyone has to be in constant accord on a forum such as this. If we all agreed, all of the time, there would be no context, colour or lively debate on some of these things that impact is all in our own way. That debate is sometimes where we uncover some absolute gems in our learning. I did see your immediate retort to my post, but thought better or replying, as There was nothing to be gained. When you then liked my post, it left me flummoxed. Anyway, with the benefit of re-reading your original post and my response, perhaps both could have been clearer in their intent. I do try to add context to replies I make, but as we all know, we miss so many aspects of communication when we are often typing what would be our spoken word.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?