lucylocket61
Expert
- Messages
- 6,394
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Not the minimum for survival, the minimum for good all round nutrition.
Yes, we are all different.
But. There is an enormous body of knowledge and research done on fasting and VLCDs for those with diabetes, and especially since I was diagnosed (ie in the last eight years. There was very little when I first went online and looked into it. Not so now.)
As I said at the beginning, this thread would have been best served in the low-calorie diet section, or even in fasting, as there are lots of people with diabetes like me, who use IF and fasting techniques as part of their treatment. (If 'merely' losing weight, and low-carbing put me in remission I would be long gone and living my low-carb in remission life out of here!.) (Ditto exercise.) But insulin resistance diabetes can be way more complex than many people realise. Just saying.
So - 1200 cals is not the very minimum for a diet lasting more than a couple of weeks. More like 800 for a VLCD. (It was 800 last time I checked.) At 300 - yes - for two weeks, it was closer to a no-food fast leading up to a VLCD. I don't find that shocking, as I did a water only no-food fast (only 3 to 4 days as a normal weighted person, post lower carbing).
Our bodies have evolved to deal with times of famine, and we can survive such well. If we couldn't none of us would be here. And, those of us who put weight around the belly and waist generously (which I am one for sure) - it can be said, and is, that our forebears withstood famines and the paleolithic period because our bodies are so good at storing fat for the future.
Did I experience the two VLCDs I have done as like a period of famine? Oh yes. Do I regret doing them? No. If there was a chance I could put my diabetes in remission, I wanted to try it. I am mildly OCD, so I can do that kind of thing. (I also keep very fullsome records.)