Just to add, waist/height measurment tells you nothing about visceral fat. So, to me it is about as good as BMI in that it is a rough guide. So too is the waist/hips ratio, these are all great for motivation if you are overweight but mean little for measuring the fat that often is overlooked by some people and is, imo, more dangerous.
Sorry for the serious side but it is sometimes important to be aware of these things.
Just my opinion obviously - but I think it is a little better than BMI.
Both are good for trends - like BG, regardless of your current state it is a good way of seeing progress which is important. Then at an absolute, BMI can be impacted so badly by muscle mass - of heavy bones - it becomes tricky to compare thus put people into categories, where the waist size is less impacted. Thinner people and also very toned people tend to have a lower waist size. And tummy fat or apple shaped is known to be an indicator of visceral fat. Not perfect but I am 100% focused on removing as much of my waist size as I can and I am already at a good waist and good visceral fat but I know there is more to go after.
Of course the ultimate is an MIR scan and knowing exactly how much fat is there and where it is but given these things are not easy to have done regularly waist measurement is a good indicator I think.
I stand 5'10" and I think I am 33" waist - I wear 34" Jeans and these days need a belt to keep them up as I ahve lost 6 kilos since being diagnosed 6 months ago.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?