I eat quite a lot of saturated fat - I'm on LCHF diet. At my last blood test, I was told that overall cholesterol level was a bit elevated but that the HDL/LDL ratio (that is what matters) was really good.It would be great to be able to eat lots of saturated fat, but then how do I lower my LDL cholesterol? Or doesn't that matter any more?
Not sure it ever did matter all that much... cholesterol is a knotty issue little understood. But for women higher is often seen as better.. its all about your HDL/ Triglyceride ratio.It would be great to be able to eat lots of saturated fat, but then how do I lower my LDL cholesterol? Or doesn't that matter any more?
Thanks, Deespee. Were you tested fasting?I eat quite a lot of saturated fat - I'm on LCHF diet. At my last blood test, I was told that overall cholesterol level was a bit elevated but that the HDL/LDL ratio (that is what matters) was really good.
Thanks Bullbiker. Those are impressive triglyceride numbers. Were you fasting? 2 years ago my GP told me not to fast any more before cholesterol tests, and since then my triglycerides have jumped up from 0.4 to 1.8. Latest test: Total 5.5, HDL 2.6, LDL 2.1, ratio 2:1.Not sure it ever did matter all that much... cholesterol is a knotty issue little understood. But for women higher is often seen as better.. its all about your HDL/ Triglyceride ratio.
Professor Jeremy Pearson, of the British Heart Foundation said health officials should re-examine dietary advice, to ensure the public was getting the best message.
“This study suggests we should perhaps pay more attention to the amount of carbohydrate in our diet than we have in the past and we may need to revise the guidelines,” he said.
We’ve seen the recently published observational study looking at the associations of fats and carbohydrate intake on cardiovascular disease and mortality. How does this impact on carbohydrate intake recommendations?
We eat foods (e.g. fruits and vegetables), not nutrients (e.g. carbohydrates and fats) which is what this study reported on. As an evidence-based profession we value the whole body of scientific evidence to guide our practice. This one new observational study does contribute to the continuingly changing body of nutritional science but, in itself, does not have the strength of evidence to change guidelines. Australians can be confident that that Australian Dietary Guidelines give solid recommendations for healthy eating at a population level.
No it does'ntIt would be great to be able to eat lots of saturated fat, but then how do I lower my LDL cholesterol? Or doesn't that matter any more?
Article about this in Wednesday's Telegraph. Haven't checked other papers - but it's an interesting read. And about time, too.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-higher-death-rates-major-lancet-study-finds/
It's also interesting (and entirely typical) to see PHE and NHS spokes people sail clean past the salient points and insist they've had it right all along.
Still, can't help but feel that the tide might finally be starting to turn.
Oxford Professor Susan Jebb, the government’s former obesity tsar, said the findings supported UK guidance.
She said: “This is a thumbs-up for UK recommendations which advise up to 35 per cent of energy from fat and an average of 50 per cent of energy from carbohydrate - of which only 5 per cent should be sugar."
Dr Alison Tedstone, chief nutritionist at Public Health England said a high fat diet could lead to weight gain and increase the risk of heart disease.
“We recommend a balanced diet based on starchy carbohydrates, while reducing total fat intake and swapping saturated fats for unsaturated fats,” she said.
Apart from Dr Alison Tedstone who just says the same thing all the time whatever the study may imply..The strange thing about this study is that every one seems to see what they like to see...so every one is happy...nothing really changed...
Is this the one?The one that was quickly withdrawn from youtube after publication..
Judging from the response of DAA, not much is going to change...they will still stonewall.
https://www.facebook.com/dietitians...7449.143214955708915/1620791041284625/?type=3
They're panicking because their dietary advice is being shown to be at best incorrect and at worst dangerous.I have just read this. The daa have said that the report looks at carbohydrates and not what we eat, ie "fruits and vegetables". What does that even mean ? Are the daa saying that they tell all thier patients not to eat any grains at all and only fruit and veg? That they tell them not to eat brown rice/pasta etc and cut out all but carbs in fruit and veg?
And have they completely forgotten about the carbs in fruit and veg?
I do not understand thier response at all.
Anybody know?
Thanks for posting this.Is this the one?
That was indeed the oneIs this the one?
I have been low salt for years - as that was what I as advised when I was first diagnosed 20 years ago. The result is that I completely lost my taste for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?