Statins and T2D

Resurgam

Expert
Messages
9,849
Type of diabetes
Type 2 (in remission!)
Treatment type
Diet only
I found that taking Atorvastatin reduced my mobility a lot - that can't be good for my heart
 

Bluetit1802

Legend
Messages
25,216
Type of diabetes
Type 2 (in remission!)
Treatment type
Diet only
Did he say what risk you would have of a heart attack if you took statins? 42% sounds awfully precise, he must be an incredibly diagnostic medic. It seems that statins cause significant muscle problems in some patients, what concerns me is what taking them has done to my heart muscle..the heart is just a very complicated muscle. I certainly think atorvastatin pushed me over the prediabetic fence into being classed as diabetic! D.

I imagine he used the QRISK2 calculation as recommended by NICE.
https://qrisk.org/2017/

Have a go @Guzzler and see what you come up with.
 

LittleGreyCat

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,233
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Tablets (oral)
Dislikes
Diet drinks - the artificial sweeteners taste vile.
Having to forswear foods I have loved all my life.
Trying to find low carb meals when eating out.
Ah, statistics.

Roughly 80% of T2 diabetics are over weight or obese on diagnosis. Non-diabetics who are overweight or obese also have a raised risk. Poorly controlled diabetes can restake in damage to the nervous and vascular system.

So the statistics include morbidly obese diabetics with enormously elevated blood glucose who are already suffering extreme consequences such as blindness and amputation.

If you are slim and fit then your individual risk factor is probably lower.

42% chance? So neay half the posters here have had or will have an incident?

Or 42% higher chance? In which case what is the original figure.
 

Bluetit1802

Legend
Messages
25,216
Type of diabetes
Type 2 (in remission!)
Treatment type
Diet only
Ah, statistics.

Roughly 80% of T2 diabetics are over weight or obese on diagnosis. Non-diabetics who are overweight or obese also have a raised risk. Poorly controlled diabetes can restake in damage to the nervous and vascular system.

So the statistics include morbidly obese diabetics with enormously elevated blood glucose who are already suffering extreme consequences such as blindness and amputation.

If you are slim and fit then your individual risk factor is probably lower.

42% chance? So neay half the posters here have had or will have an incident?

Or 42% higher chance? In which case what is the original figure.

The QRISK2 calculation isn't calculated quite like that. If the 42% is from the Qrisk, which I imagine it is, then it means she has a 42% risk from everyone with identical risk factors to herself, not a 42% risk overall. In other words, in a crowd of 100 people with the same risk factors as @Guzzler , 42 are likely to have a heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years.
 

JohnEGreen

Master
Messages
13,188
Type of diabetes
Other
Treatment type
Diet only
Dislikes
Tripe and Onions
Well the answer is simple then just avoid crowds.:)
 

douglas99

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,572
Type of diabetes
I reversed my Type 2
Treatment type
Other
Did he say what risk you would have of a heart attack if you took statins? 42% sounds awfully precise, he must be an incredibly diagnostic medic. It seems that statins cause significant muscle problems in some patients, what concerns me is what taking them has done to my heart muscle..the heart is just a very complicated muscle. I certainly think atorvastatin pushed me over the prediabetic fence into being classed as diabetic! D.
Maybe it affects some muscles differently? I've never once read anyone has been stopped playing marbles as it affected muscles in the thumb for example , so maybe your heart muscle will be ok. Probably worth a look with Google to reassure you, as that does seem to list the muscles that may be affected in some small cases.
 

Guzzler

Master
Messages
10,577
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Dislikes
Poor grammar, bullying and drunks.
New evidence seems to suggest that lowering cholesterol levels in women especially has a negligible and possibly negative effect on the chances of them living longer. i.e. higher cholesterol levels leads to longer life. There is also current research going on that may well show that cholesterol levels, like blood sugar levels, are dynamic and may change during the day - possibly dependent on what you have eaten. So your Dr or nI'm ol(who is extremely unlikely to know about the fluctuations) will test you and prescribe a drug which they think you should take for life based on a single snapshot of your cholesterol levels at the time of doing the test. Which would be similar to diagnosing diabetes on a single finger prick test. Crazy? maybe but that is what currently happens. Criminal.. again possibly. Please remember what you put in your body is up to you and not up to your HCP's. The benefits of statins for older women are probably non existent (at least that is what my extensive reading has shown). This is just some random person on the internet and I am in no way a medical professional but I would heartily recommend spending some time on researching statins and their "benefits".


Thanks bulkbiker and bluetit. I seem to remember something I heard on the news about the so called benefits of statins which I mentioned to my new gp. He did the calculation and said that because I have been dx with T2, high cholestrol and I'm a smoker my risk was 42%. He did not say anything about how much statins could lower that risk. To be honest, a generalised figure of 50-50 did not shock me because there is a long history of heart attack in my family i.e I know how I'm going to kick the bucket. (All heart readings and blood pressure have been normal)
 

bulkbiker

BANNED
Messages
19,576
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Thanks bulkbiker and bluetit. I seem to remember something I heard on the news about the so called benefits of statins which I mentioned to my new gp. He did the calculation and said that because I have been dx with T2, high cholestrol and I'm a smoker my risk was 42%. He did not say anything about how much statins could lower that risk. To be honest, a generalised figure of 50-50 did not shock me because there is a long history of heart attack in my family i.e I know how I'm going to kick the bucket. (All heart readings and blood pressure have been normal)
As I'm sure you know the best thing you could do is stop smoking.. but as an ex smoker I also know how easy that is to say and how hard to do. All the best though.
 

jonbvn

Well-Known Member
Messages
553
Type of diabetes
Type 2
As I'm sure you know the best thing you could do is stop smoking.. but as an ex smoker I also know how easy that is to say and how hard to do. All the best though.
Absolutely agree. Stopping smoking is better for you than all of the other dietary recommendations we spend so much time debating put together.

Speaking as an ex-smoker.......
 

Guzzler

Master
Messages
10,577
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Dislikes
Poor grammar, bullying and drunks.
TBH my smoking has increased since T2 was diagnosed, it's the stress.
 

ringi

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,365
Type of diabetes
Type 2
There have been very large scale trails that show taking Statins increase length of life and quality of like even if someone’s Cholesterol is “normal”. I think Statins make a high BG less harmful and the benefits are a lot more than the harm from a small increase in BG.

Personally I going to keep taking the Statins and reduce my BG with low (or mid) curb food, a walk after most meals (10 minutes is shown to be of a lot of benefit) and increased exercise to improve insulin sensitivity. I am about to start to strength exercise as well as the current power walking, so as to get more muscle in the rest of my body, as they can burn fat for me, and take up the BG more quickly. (I should lose 4 stone, but care more about increasing muscle mass and keeping BG low.)

Remember the BG monitoring is a tool, and the BG level is a way to help you see how you are doing, having a low BG is of no value if you die due to something else, or have a low quality of life….. (Since my GP have decided I have Diabetes (just over two weeks ago) I have gone from a BG of 35 to mostly under 6, most of this due to reducing curb, including no longer drinking a carton of orange juice each day.)

Most people get on well with Statins, most people who post to a forum do not. That does not mean that most people reading the forum will not get on well with Statins! (The same can be said about Metformin, the only diabetes med I am happy to take.)
 

bulkbiker

BANNED
Messages
19,576
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
I think Statins make a high BG less harmful

I'm pretty sure the studies you speak of have never shown that particular benefit. And indeed they seem to raise some people's blood glucose levels.
The problem a lot of people have with the science behind statin therapy is the underlying assumption that "cholesterol" is bad.
It is essential for life and is produced and regulated by your body. The mechanisms of exactly how and what it does are not yet fully understood so to artificially lower it by taking a drug could be messing with something that is both essential and natural.
a low BG is of no value if you die due to something else
very true however as elevated blood glucose levels seem to be a precursor to many other diseases then it is certainly worth doing all we can to keep it under control.
 

ringi

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,365
Type of diabetes
Type 2
There is increasing evidence that small cholesterol particles plus high BG is very harmful, see the Living Low Curb book.

The large scale Satin trails looked at the outcome on number of heart attacks and strokes over a long length of time. Satins showed good benefits in people with high risk factors regardless of the level of cholesterol (basic tests) they had. (So they are not just lowing a number on the GP's computer.)

Until there is a cheap way to measure cholesterol particles count, or get a detailed of the particle sizes, so it is recorded on most people GP records so allow large tails, I don’t think we will be able work out what types of high cholesterol is bad. (Clearly the standard GP tests don’t show the complete truth.)

Research seems to show that low curb gets even better results then Statins, but I don't think anyone has done large scale research looking at Low Curb with Statins.
 

Guzzler

Master
Messages
10,577
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Dislikes
Poor grammar, bullying and drunks.
I think I needs to get me a science degree...
 

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
There have been very large scale trails that show taking Statins increase length of life
I'd love to see those results. Let's look rather at 'number needed to treat', a useful indication of a drug's efficacy

Living longer ?
"There is controversy about whether mortality is reduced by statins in this group. We do not believe so, but are aware that others interpret these data differently. The analyses suggesting mortality benefits in low risk patients are performed by a single group and they are done in a fashion we do not agree with."

Benefits/harms :
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluetit1802

LittleGreyCat

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,233
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Tablets (oral)
Dislikes
Diet drinks - the artificial sweeteners taste vile.
Having to forswear foods I have loved all my life.
Trying to find low carb meals when eating out.
The QRISK2 calculation isn't calculated quite like that. If the 42% is from the Qrisk, which I imagine it is, then it means she has a 42% risk from everyone with identical risk factors to herself, not a 42% risk overall. In other words, in a crowd of 100 people with the same risk factors as @Guzzler , 42 are likely to have a heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years.
My point being that as far as I am aware the risk factor is having Diabetes. Not a subset of those with normal weight and good blood glucose control.