Because TB isn’t common in the U.S., children here do not receive the vaccine.
alsoThe BCG is no longer offered to children in secondary schools in the UK. It was replaced in 2005 with a targeted programme for babies, children and young adults at higher risk of TB.
which makes me wonder why adults don't/didn't get a booster. I was done as a teenager at school (assume aged 15) so I should have had a booster at 30 and 45 to maintain my immunity if the vaccine only lasts 15 years.The BCG vaccination is thought to protect up to 80% of people for up to 15 years.
so even if there was a response nobody would have tied it in with a vaccination taken 3 years ago.While it took three years for patients to see results from the vaccine, two doses of the drug spaced four weeks apart were still having a lasting impact eight years later.
Quack quack![]()
Thank you for your constructive contribution
And here's an example on why "small" studies should be treated with concern. (A journalist deliberately designed the study knowing he could "prove" chocolate was good for you to demonstrate how he could get flawed science published and believed by the press.)
http://io9.com/i-fooled-millions-into-thinking-chocolate-helps-weight-1707251800
It's a wonderful read, highly recommended.
OK, that's fair enough. I think I got irritated by articles claiming that it reversed T1, instead of being a potentially useful aid. And that's the journalists' fault because it makes a better headline. Actually, I think the journalists are quacking.Denise Faustman is not a quack though (that was an unhelpful comment)
In fact, the researchers determined that the BCG vaccine does not restore insulin production in the subjects, as measured by C-peptide levels. This stands in contrast to their previous research in mouse models that demonstrated increased insulin secretion in the BCG-treated animals. The vaccine does not appear to decrease insulin resistance either.