Come back when you learn about T2s Don't show your gross ignorance by generalizing!I'm sorry but this has completely angered me!! ...snip..., most T2 are diabetic due to poor lifestyle, poor diet, no exercise and being over weight, ...snip... Silly silly people agreeing with this!
most T2 are diabetic due to poor lifestyle, poor diet, no exercise and being over weight, they still produce insulin just not enough to go round their bodies
No, because blood circulation is not optional. Carb consumption is optional. Intolerance is variable, not absolute. Intolerance of carbs in diabetics is proportional to their insulin resistance and inversely proportional to their ability to produce insulin. Since even advanced stage Type 1s have tiny insulin production, they have a tiny amount of remaining tolerance to carbs.Surely the point here is that a T1 diabetic does not have a functioning pancreas and cannot produce insulin. The medical dictionary defines intolerance as "Extreme sensitivity or allergy to a drug, food or other substance". A T1 is not extremely sensitive to carbohydrates, they have no mechanism to deal with carbohydrates.
If your kidneys stop working and you can't filter your blood would you be blood intolerant?
Why? I don't eat sugar, rice, bread, pasta or potatoes so eat very low carb. Carb is energy which can be gained through upping the amount of fat you eat. I have lost 2 stone in 3 months.No, that's just a stupid oversimplification.
Exactly why I think saying "carb intolerant" is a dangerous statement to make. If you were ever to collapse, some people may withhold sugary drinks etc in the believe that it's the wrong thing to do due to the "intolerance".If diabetics were carb intolerant they certainly wouldn't be using carbs to treat hypos.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
This is why I said most T2 not all T2, plus why would anyone think it's easier to say I'm carb intolerant when out in resteraunts or out with people that don't know about the condition
who? Do you agree or disagree that we are carb intolerant? XxxWell said
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
It may be dangerous but that doesn't mean it's not true. I see your point about how ignorant people could think they need to not give carbs for a hypo. In fact, that already happens. Ignorant people already get confused and say you shouldn't give carbs to a diabetic, not realising that there are two opposing rules: fewer carbs ordinarily, carbs imperative when having a hypo. Two rules is more than most people can cope with for a condition they don't have and don't understand.Exactly why I think saying "carb intolerant" is a dangerous statement to make. If you were ever to collapse, some people may withhold sugary drinks etc in the believe that it's the wrong thing to do due to the "intolerance".
This is exactly the conversation I had on Mother's Day in la tasca. Substitute the word rice for bananas. I have also had it at work when I was told by a member of the management team that her dad was diabetic and that I was wrong not to eat carbs. I was also told by one member of management that eating LCHF was dangerous and that I was heading for a stroke so this is why @Ashlie people say they are carb intolerant. If I eat starchy carb then my bs goes from 5-6 to double figures. Which would suggest an intolerance for me as a T2. Incidentally, whilst 80% of t2 are obese, 80% of obese people are not diabetic which would suggest that genes do play a part.Ashlie said: "why would anyone think it's easier to say I'm carb intolerant when out in resteraunts".
Because many non-diabetic people have pre-conceived ideas about what a diabetic should be eating, or for that matter, doing. As we see on this forum, even diabetics have very different ideas and needs. Therefore if, rightly or wrongly, you, as a T1 or as a T2 want to avoid eating carbs, this is often the easiest way of dealing with it.
It avoids the sort of conversations we could all do without, along the lines of,
Diabetic: "Are there bananas in this dish, I'm a diabetic, I can't eat bananas, could it be done without banana?Diabetic's lovely night out spoiled.
Waiter: "My dad was a diabetic, he always ate bananas"
D: "but they contain a lot of starch and ……."
W: "if you're a diabetic, you shouldn't be having that glass of wine"
However, Ashlie, I do wish you well on your plans and ambitions to educate the public about diabetes. Unfortunately, given the level of knowledge demonstrated in some postings by diabetics on this thread, I suspect that an uninterested public will be an uphill task.
Sally
The only reason us Type 1s need carbs is as an antidote to when we have overdosed on injected insulin. This is to do with treatment, not to do with the condition itself . (Hypos are "iatrogenic"). We need carbs the way a nerve gas victim needs atropine - another antidote that is highly poisonous and can easily kill if it is misused. Otherwise, unless we are dealing with an overdose of injected insulin, we don't need carbs. In all other situations we are carb intolerant and can only ingest carbs with any degree of safety by injecting this drug, insulin, and dealing with the risks that injecting the drug entails.Nothing to add that hasn't already been said. But my view, an intolerance of something means you cut it it out all together because you can't tolerate it. But, carbs/sugar have saved me from having numerous hypos, if I had been intolerant it wouldn't of worked. Not due to injecting too much qa insulin but, as the body does not recognise as quickly, a drop in blood sugar caused by artificial insulin even the much needed basal insulin can lead to severe hypos during excercise/stress, long periods with no carbs.
Sent from the Diabetes Forum App
No, because blood circulation is not optional. Carb consumption is optional. Intolerance is variable, not absolute. Intolerance of carbs in diabetics is proportional to their insulin resistance and inversely proportional to their ability to produce insulin. Since even advanced stage Type 1s have tiny insulin production, they have a tiny amount of remaining tolerance to carbs.
The way see it is like this. Giving a diabetic carbs and insulin is like giving someone poison, and then giving them a second, poisonous antidote for the first poison. If the antidote is exactly matched to the poison, all the time, no harm is done. If the match is anything less than perfect (and it never will be perfect) then either the first poison (glucose) predominates and causes damage, or the second poison (insulin) predominates and does damage.