I'd be grateful in this instance if some kind person would tell me what to think!
5.5 Total cholesterol
Unfortunately nobody should tell you what to think on this one. I spent years trying to get a grip of what the truth is and there were several truths that made me very cautious about taking a statin, but I carried on because of medical advise.
In the end the decision was simple, my leg muscles hurt a lot, so much so that I wasn't able to walk any reasonable distance like to the local shops which are less than 1/2 mile away. I stopped and my cholesterol rose to 5.4, where it is now.
There is an excellent graph produced by the British Heart Foundation which shows the total cholesterol levels of people with cardio vascular disease. It shows that over 5.4 there starts to be an increase in the number of people with CVD, strangely it shows the same thing below 5.4 as well. Almost suggesting that 5.4 is some sort of optimum. I've been trying to find it and it has been on this forum. I'll edit this message with the graph when I find it.
Found it -
http://biohackyourself.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Mortality-v-Chol1.pdf.
I hope you can read it, the details are a bit small. If the graph is anything to go by 5.5 isn't bad.
I recently saw this video,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=312&v=yX1vBA9bLNk, it made me feel a lot happier about my decision to stop taking statins, although it was my personal experience that was the driving factor and should be for everyone because we are all so different. The part I found most interesting is how the stats are presented to say things like "statins reduce the risk of CVD by 33%", when you look at the calculation, which he describes so simply, you will be shocked at what it actually means. Basically it's say that if you had 100 people not taking a statin and 3 died from CVD, a similar group of 100 people, but taking a statin, and only 2 die. One less per three or a 33% reduction. Clever!