I think you’ve probably answered your own question here:but what could have caused this ?
Stick around the forum for inspiration and let us know how the retest goes.… have probably been a little lazy this summer and have veered off slightly with food choices
An HbA1c represents an average bood glucose level over 3 months. I can't understand why they want to see you in 2 weeks!HI - Firstly its been a while since I visited, I was diagnosed prediabetic in 2014, not overweight, very active and still am, have had yearly HBA1c results each year since always between 42 and 45, had a few OGTT's and always come out ok. Diet is reasonable, generally fairly low carb with - I don't have a sweet tooth, though have probably been a little lazy this summer and have veered off slightly with food choices and red wine intake, but exercise wise is still 8 plus hours a week.
So I had my yearly HBA1c and its 52 so have been called back for a test 2 weeks later which is tomorrow ...
My assumption is that if when I get my results next week if the HBA1c is back to normal then it musty have been a glitch, but what could have caused this ? If it's not back down then I will be looking at next steps depending what doc says , possibly go full LCHF is my intention and reduce alcohol intake to battle this if it can be done without other intervention.
Are there glitches with the HBA1c and what causes then if so ?
Thanks
An HbA1c represents an average bood glucose level over 3 months. I can't understand why they want to see you in 2 weeks!
You did fall off the wagon a bit, more carb intake simply means higher blood glucose, so higher HbA1c readings. Cut them back down, and you can get them into the normal range. (Which I'd personally have preferred over settling for the prediabetic range: I was still fatigued when I was in that range for a bit, dunno about you though).HI - Firstly its been a while since I visited, I was diagnosed prediabetic in 2014, not overweight, very active and still am, have had yearly HBA1c results each year since always between 42 and 45, had a few OGTT's and always come out ok. Diet is reasonable, generally fairly low carb with - I don't have a sweet tooth, though have probably been a little lazy this summer and have veered off slightly with food choices and red wine intake, but exercise wise is still 8 plus hours a week.
So I had my yearly HBA1c and its 52 so have been called back for a test 2 weeks later which is tomorrow ...
My assumption is that if when I get my results next week if the HBA1c is back to normal then it musty have been a glitch, but what could have caused this ? If it's not back down then I will be looking at next steps depending what doc says , possibly go full LCHF is my intention and reduce alcohol intake to battle this if it can be done without other intervention.
Are there glitches with the HBA1c and what causes then if so ?
Thanks
Thank you @CatsFive !Guidelines are to not diagnose from 1 result. This test is just incase the previous one was a glitch, not to see if the op has changed his lifestyle enough
I think they'll confirm your T2 diagnosis when you see the doc. There's around a 5% allowable error in the test but it would be unusual for both to be off the same way - you'd have to have a "real" A1c of about 47/48 and both tests to be skewed high.Results are back - and 2nd HbA1c is 51 so a reduction from the last one but not much, have been requested for a follow up consultation with GP ... however next available appointment is the end of November so some time to ponder in between. I will continue with the finger prick testing over the next month and see how things go along with watching/reducing the carb intake.
Any other tips for the next month until I have my review ? Anything I should be aware of ?
Thank you, I will heed your advice re the testing - I think that is the most confusing thing to get used to. Testing itself is simple and recording the results, its the interpretation of the results that clouds things and ensuring you are timing the tests correctly.I think they'll confirm your T2 diagnosis when you see the doc. There's around a 5% allowable error in the test but it would be unusual for both to be off the same way - you'd have to have a "real" A1c of about 47/48 and both tests to be skewed high.
The important bit to my mind about fingerprick testing is that it shows you how efficiently your system deals with various foods. If after two hours you've not returned to within 2mmol/l of your starting point (and below 8) then there were too many carbs in that meal for you to deal with properly. That gives you strong information about what not to eat. I found it essential in getting a grip in the early weeks and in providing good feedback about what I was doing. You can (some luck and willpower needed) make significant changes in a matter of weeks.
There's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't continue with lowering your carb intake in the time before you see your doc. It's possible you'll be offered metformin - I was, with an HbA1c of 50 at dx, and I refused it. That's something you might want to read up about so you can make an informed choice if the offer is made.
best of luck.
No problem. When you say spikes, do you just mean rises in blood glucose? My interpretation has always been that a "spike" is a sharp and sometimes unexpected rise to comparatively high levels. However I've seen people saying "I ate X and I spiked to 6"... for me, not a spike.Thank you, I will heed your advice re the testing - I think that is the most confusing thing to get used to. Testing itself is simple and recording the results, its the interpretation of the results that clouds things and ensuring you are timing the tests correctly.
A couple of years ago I was lucky enough to get access to the Supersapiens CGM and used it for about a year but I found it confusing to decipher the results and pinpoint exactly what was causing spikes - some days the same foods caused no considerable spikes others they did, some days exercise spiked, others it didn't. Generally I'd wake with high BS usually over 7 and rarely do I ever go under 6 even on next to zero carbs. (Note I understand Supersapiens is for sports not Diabetes monitoring and has its limitations but still utilises the abbots sensor. I compete in Ironman triathlon up to Ironman distance so regularly train 6 or 7 days a week with swim, bike and run - I was using the supersapiens to assist with my fueling for long distance events, but this was at a time when they had only just released the unit and app - it was very flakey.
I have lots of questions on what different things causes spikes but will have a look through the forum to see if I can see further info before posting.
Thanks
Just after diagnosis I was amazed to discover that some meals (with carb) seemed to lower my blood glucose. The issue (I eventually discovered) wasn't the food, but was the large glass of red wine that went along with it. Alcohol stops the liver adding glucose to the blood (much as metformin does) so a meal with wine does not show you what the food alone would do.
It reduces the amount of glucose your liver constantly trickles in your bloodstream for as long as said liver is busy dealing with the alcohol.Does a glass of wine with a meal reduce the effects of carbohydrates or simply mask them?
As others have said, it doesn't actually do anything with the carbs you've eaten. It stops your liver trickle-feeding glucose. The carbs you ate are still there and are being digested to glucose and entering the bloodstream as always. You simply get a skewed reading that looks too good to be true, and that's what it is.Does a glass of wine with a meal reduce the effects of carbohydrates or simply mask them?
Hi - thanks for the reply and information. Re spikes it was more BG rising when I hadn't consumed anything in addition to the usual rises from food, exercise etc - Also as mentioned sometimes rising sometimes not after eating teh same thing.No problem. When you say spikes, do you just mean rises in blood glucose? My interpretation has always been that a "spike" is a sharp and sometimes unexpected rise to comparatively high levels. However I've seen people saying "I ate X and I spiked to 6"... for me, not a spike.
I've found that the more strenuous the exercise the higher my BG. I think this is caused by my liver dumping necessary glucose as extra fuel. It's hard to catch by fingerprick testing, as it's gone very quickly after I stop. CGMs are very good for this.
I totally agree about the interpretation of results. Just after diagnosis I was amazed to discover that some meals (with carb) seemed to lower my blood glucose. The issue (I eventually discovered) wasn't the food, but was the large glass of red wine that went along with it. Alcohol stops the liver adding glucose to the blood (much as metformin does) so a meal with wine does not show you what the food alone would do.
a lot of us find that the liver keeps on adding glucose until it's happy you don't need anything more - and that usually means eating something. IMy ex[perience is that my liver's happy if i have four almonds. If I don't eat, it will go on slowly adding glucose for at least six hours - it could be longer, but I got bored after six hours.Hi - thanks for the reply and information. Re spikes it was more BG rising when I hadn't consumed anything in addition to the usual rises from food, exercise etc - Also as mentioned sometimes rising sometimes not after eating teh same thing.
Re the alcohol - that is very interesting, I am an avid red wine drinker, was most nights... and currently only drinking on a weekend prob 2 glasses a night, will be interesting to see what difference, if any this makes to the readings.
Yesterday I reduced carb intake a bit and tested fairly regularly - results were
Breakfast - scrambled eggs, avacado, plumb toms and cumberland sausage - 11gms carbs
Lunch - Chicken salad, Kvarg yoghurt and couple slices of Fruity five - 47g carbs
Dinner - bolognese with cauliflower rice, mixed nuts with greek yoghurt - 46g carbs (6.30pm)
Exercise I swam for 30 mins first thing
Total carbs for the day 103g - no snacking
#Pre lunch 5.3mmol after not eating for 4 hours. I had highs of 10.1 two hours post lunch and then 2hr30 post lunch 9.1
By dinner it had settled to 5.6, two hours post dinner 8.8 and by 9.45pm it was 8.1
Above for info only -
This morning upon waking at 5.55am I tested 7.5mmol and then tested again before breakfast at 8.32 and it was 9.3 - then 2 hours post breakfast was down to 6.6 (breakfast was poached eggs, sausage and toms)
My question regarding this is why would my reading continue to go up in the morning after waking and before breakfast? I know about the dawn phenomenon but assumed the reading would settle after you had got up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?