You know perfectly well what I mean. It's not the 'specific' term "carboholic" that's at question. Elitism is a 'mentality' which has 'certain' verbiage. Do a search for phraseology containing - 'carbs', 'bad' 'culprit', etc. But let me not 'ignite' anything new.borofergie said:NewdestinyX said:It's not those of us who moderate our carbs that struggle with the 'elitism' it's those who use the term 'carboholic'.
Why are we reigniting this?
Check out the following link and tell me how many derogatory uses of the word "carboholic" you can find:
search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&keywords=carboholic
I'll give you a clue: The answer is strictly less than 1.
This is a non-problem.
NewdestinyX said:Nigel you've clearly misread my post. I'm squarely on your side and understood your post perfectly and attempted to amplify your point. It's not those of us who moderate our carbs that struggle with the 'elitism' it's those who use the term 'carboholic'. Read my post again a little more carefully. All my words 'completely' supported your views. Can't imagine any other interpretation. :-?
NewdestinyX said:...There is a sort of unintentional (sometimes intentional) elitism that rises from people who control with very lo carb regimens. And the 'subtle' but still very palpable 'judgement' is there too often for my tastes.
...
So you combine that irrefutable cause & effect (lower carbs = lower bg levels) with people's distaste for, fear of oral or injected meds then finally combined with the world's increasing love for 'naturalistic/homeopathic' approaches to health management - there emerges a 'purist' mentality on many disease forums (not just diabetes) that there is 'a pure way' to travel when fighting this disease.
...
Any word ending in "----holic" speaks to a set of 'character flaws' or 'mental flaws'. That makes carboholic 'inherently' a 'judgemental' term.
... But even 'subtle statements' like Bowell's I quote above - can send (even unintentionally) this subtle 'elitism' that Nigel refers to originally in this thread. There is no supposed 'purer' path to controlling BG levels.
...... Because the body and MIND need something 'more'.
.
NewdestinyX said:.......and killing someone some day because of the stress they can't control becuase they're myopically overfocussed on their BG levels.
...... I choose a low-moderate level of carbs and very little rapid acting insulin and high mileage biking
As I wrote earlier in this recent thread: http://www.diabetes.co.uk/diabetes-forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=23420#p213082NewdestinyX said:... I would challenge any one on this forum who's chosen the very lo carb route to tell us with certainty that if they could be cured from diabetes they would 'keep eating' the 'exact same way' they eat now BECAUSE of their diabetes - with regard to carbs.
...
As long as they don't end up 'going postal' and killing someone some day because of the stress they can't control becuase they're myopically overfocussed on their BG levels. ...
I stand behind that statement... and as for my myopic focus on BGs, I have tested maybe twice this week so far... what about you? My latest A1c was 6.2% :shock: and I am OK with that... any tighter control is simply not worth the effort for me right now... I have a life!pianoman said:What I now enjoy eating is varied, tasty, filling, nutritious, satisfying and delicious. I don't feel in the least bit deprived... that may be a problem for the perception of others.
I see no reason why I would not or could not continue to eat this way for the rest of my life... even if I were "cured" tomorrow.
Feel free to advocate your own way of managing diabetes without denigrating anyone else's.
What I now enjoy eating is varied, tasty, filling, nutritious, satisfying and delicious. I don't feel in the least bit deprived... that may be a problem for the perception of others.
I see no reason why I would not or could not continue to eat this way for the rest of my life... even if I were "cured" tomorrow.
NewdestinyX said:Again it's not those of us who 'moderate carbs' that tend to have a problem with those that strictly limit them. It's almost always the other way around.
...Injected insulin for a Type 2 is certainly an option and for some a necessity -- call it drug, therapy or whatever... it requires a [Doctor's] prescription, is dispensed by a Pharmacist, comes with a list of side-effects and cautions and should be treated with respect. With any intervention there should be a risk:benefit ratio determined and of course injected insulin can be used safely in the long-term.
Not sure what you're construing my words to say there - but I do have a problem with people who 'preach' "strictly limiting carbs" as the 'only efficient or effective way' to manage T2D. It's the judgment in the tone of the posts that's palpable and the most divisive thing on diabetic forums. To be honest I don't even really understand the 'high horse' attitude by many on your side of the issue -but- I do understand passion about something that works for you.. so we'd align there. The reason I speak up with the 'passion' and, I apologize, sometimes 'more aggressively toned' responses or posturing is because of the 'judgement' and lack of balanced sharing from the ultra low carbers.Etty said:NewdestinyX said:Again it's not those of us who 'moderate carbs' that tend to have a problem with those that strictly limit them. It's almost always the other way around.
So glad to hear that you have no problem with strictly limiting carbs. Some people might have got the opposite view from reading your posts.
I've addressed them one by one - thread by thread, Pianoman. Just keep reading. In this thread alone I've dealt with them one by one. In the 'I Don't Get It' thread the posturing and judgement are abounding. People who judge are the last to see it, Pianoman, and they think that just because they don't use certain exact words that there's not then palpable judgment in their tone. Yes, writing 'CAN' have 'tone'. Do you think people who read our posts, by way of example, conclude that we're compadres? On the same page? Are we coming out and SAYING there's no love lost between us? No. Of course not. But is it evident? Sure. How? -- tone.pianoman said:Where are you seeing these judgmental posts? Examples please because I don't know what the heck you are talking about... you are the only one I read as "preaching".
Where??? I have also read those threads and do not see what you claim. Perhaps it is all about your perception and you are projecting... after all you are the one using such divisive terms as "on your side of the issue" ... why do there have to be sides?!? Surely we are all in this thing together.NewdestinyX said:I've addressed them one by one - thread by thread, Pianoman. Just keep reading. In this thread alone I've dealt with them one by one. In the 'I Don't Get It' thread the posturing and judgement are abounding.pianoman said:Where are you seeing these judgmental posts? Examples please because I don't know what the heck you are talking about... you are the only one I read as "preaching".
phoenix said:Almost seven years ago I was in hospital. I had lost a huge amount of weight in the previous months and the day before had had breathing difficulties when I tried to ride my bike. I was put immediately onto an insulin pump and was about to undergo test on every organ from heart to womb. A huge shock for someone whose only visits to the doctor and hospital were when I was pregnant.
Sometime during the next ten days I was told that I had T1 and would have to inject insulin several times a day for life. I'd known a few T1s and it worried me, restrictive, regimented regimes with set amounts of food. I recalled the child never allowed to eat a slice of birthday cake or go on school trips, the husband of a colleague who had frequent serious hypos ;the paramedics a frequent occurance. I remebered the 16 year old who wanted to be a dancer but was in and out of hospital with DKA
Fortunately my fears were unfounded, things have moved on. I was fortunate to read and be told that diabetes was not the end of things and that I could still do anything I wanted . On top of that I was already feeling better than I had for a very long time. I resolved to learn about my condition and to run a marathon, just to show that I could ( no stress, it was a challenge to myself).
I took advice from the dietitian, who advised balanced meals with low gi starches, I saw her for an hour a day in hospital. She taught me to count carbs (a fixed amount at the time) The meals in hospital were ordered on this prinicple, and my glucose levels soon came under control.
After hospital I read lots and joined forums. I taught myself to adjust my insulin according to what I ate, so moved from the rather restrictive regime I started on.
I eat a fair number of carbs but also have an active lifestyle and having regained some of the weight loss prior to diagnosis have remained weight stable. (if I put on a couple of kilos, I cut back all food a bit for a while, just as I did before diagnosis)
I don't consider insulin as a drug, it is a replacement for a hormone missing in my body. It is a lifesaver. Without it I would become very ill and eventually die. Possibly, I could live on a starvation diet for a while but not for long, and in the meantime would have no quality of life.
I ran that marathon and others since (I'm now 59 so not a young athlete). I enjoy my life, I don't do the mileage necessary for a marathon all the time, but I am active with walking , shorter runs, gardening and cycling and at this time of year I'm lucky enough to be able to swim daily.
I'm content and healthy, my HbA1c, measured last week was 5.7%, kidney function and lipids were fine (good HDL) I eat a varied diet of mainly natural produce including all food groups, about 40-45% of my diet is carbs (from dairy, starches, fruit and veg... I count them all) Occasionally, if I've been very active, or if I'm with friends I can eat the odd cake or piece of pizza. I don't crave them as I don't completely deny myself them, if absolutely necessary I'll run a mile on the treadmill or go for a walk to lower my BG (a 10 min swim has been known to lower my glucose level by 4 mmol.. for me exercise works)
I've a good life, the last two weeks I've been enjoying myself with my children and grandchildren. Castle visiting, biking , swimming and canoeing were all on the agenda. Oka few mild hypos but easily dealt with. We had a lovely time . I am content.
No. Projection isn't possible if you never do the thing you're accusing. I don't judge or push my way on people. I 'represent it' and 'push back' on people who put down my choices.pianoman said:Where??? I have also read those threads and do not see what you claim. Perhaps it is all about your perception and you are projecting...NewdestinyX said:I've addressed them one by one - thread by thread, Pianoman. Just keep reading. In this thread alone I've dealt with them one by one. In the 'I Don't Get It' thread the posturing and judgement are abounding.pianoman said:Where are you seeing these judgmental posts? Examples please because I don't know what the heck you are talking about... you are the only one I read as "preaching".
There are divisions, pianoman. There just are. And there 'are' sides.after all you are the one using such divisive terms as "on your side of the issue" ...
If the judging tone didn't exist I would agree with you. Sadly, though, it does.why do there have to be sides?!? Surely we are all in this thing together.
This statement breaks forum rule and I reported it.Show an example... put up or shut I I say.
I haven't missed anything. I tell what works about my choices all the time here and I never denegrate another person's choice. I DO however, and will continue, to challenge 'ideas' about regimens and what science says about the different regimens. A forum is a place for exchange and 'comparison' of ideas. Ideas are fair game. Judging 'people' for their choices and telling them they are 'hurting themselves' for choosing a certain way is wrong. Terms like 'addicted to carbs' and characterizing carbs themselves as 'inherently addictive' abound all over this and other forums. That's a totally judgmental statement (and scientifically inaccurate to boot) and is 'liberally used' at this and other D forums. Just search for the words 'carb' and 'addict' or 'addictive' and you'll read post after post of this 'judging tone' I refer to.Once again you have clearly missed the memo: Advocate your own method, by all means, but not at the expense of anyone else's. ... tell us about what works for you BUT please do so without trying to impress upon us why you think everyone else's approach is wrong.
Sorry to disagree, Viv, but you can. Very much so. In fact its' ALL about tone. There would be NO 'tiffs' on these forums if it weren't for 'tone issues' and 'postures' that are clear from 'tone'. Here are the 'off limits' words/phrases if you don't want to come off judgmental in tone against those who don't lo carb:viviennem said:But you can't judge 'tone' from a post, Grant, as you well know, being an experienced poster.
I'm never judging about a person's choice, Viv. I make that caveat in my writing all the time. I'm very careful with that and very clear. I RESPECT CHOICES!! Let's not make a moral equivalence of 'posturing against judgmentalism and elitism for a particular approach' with 'judging an particular person's approach'. They are two very different things. The only time I get 'indignant' is when people begin to 'judge' mine and other's approach to the non-very-lo carb way. And to THAT -- I do INDEED judge 'that TONE' in others to be not good for the forum ethos. And will speak right up. Judging a person's comments or attitudes to be 'bad behavior' or even judging for yourself (silently) that a certain approach wouldn't be good for you-- those are very different than judging the people themselves and their choices. Agreed? I would defy anyone here to go find a post where I 'judged a person or their personal choice. I hate when it's done to me and I don't do it. Never will.That's why it's important to make yourself clear, and to use emoticons as appropriate. Your own tone can come across as extremely judgmental sometimes, on a first quick read-through, though I'm sure you don't mean it as it sounds.
Agreed - things are way better here than some other places. Thanks for your input, Viv.As far as greeting newbies is concerned - I don't think the Info for Newbies, with which Daisy1 and/or the other moderators greet all newcomers, pushes a low-carbohydrate diet. It specifically states it does not - just suggests controlling carb intake.
Many of the 'arguments' between pro-low-carb and others come from a long time of knowing each other through posting on here. The moderators do their best to keep things friendly - and do a good job in my opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?