Yorksman
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,445
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Looking into the accuracy of the results in self monitoring, I came across this study, 'Factors Affecting Blood Glucose Monitoring: Sources of Errors in Measurement', http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769960/ Apologies if it has been posted before.
Results can be affected by many factors:
"Glucose monitoring has become an integral part of diabetes care but has some limitations in accuracy. Accuracy may be limited due to strip manufacturing variances, strip storage, and aging. They may also be due to limitations on the environment such as temperature or altitude or to patient factors such as improper coding, incorrect hand washing, altered hematocrit, or naturally occurring interfering substances. Finally, exogenous interfering substances may contribute errors to the system evaluation of blood glucose."
Not a single reading may be representative. It's the averages that count. You can see this in fig. 1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... gure/fig1/ As the text explains, "the average of a series of values can be perfectly accurate, although none of the individual values is representative of the reference."
Most importantly is the accuracy of the meter itself. The ISO 15197 standard calls for a minimum accuracy of ninety five percent of all measured values to fall within:
20% of glucose values above 75 mg/dl
15 mg of glucose values below 75 mg/dl
In other words, if for the upper range the true value would be 7.0 mmol/L, the meter is deemed accurate if it reports 95% of the time anything between 6.3 mmol/L and 7.7 mmol/L. For the lower range, anything below 4.1 mmol/L is deemed accurate if it is plus or minus 1.0 mmol/L
Now, take that upper range 6.3 to 7.7 which represents meter accuracy and then add strip accuracy, which can vary depending on how it has been stored and the testing environment, which can vary on the temperature and then the accuracy of the blood sample, which can can vary depending on what one has squeezed out of the puncture and also on what contaminants are around, and you have a a lot of reasons to be suspicious about the accuracy of the individual reading. All these factors vary however and tend to level each other out. So, do not get phased by individul readings and keep a record, most meters to anyway, of your averages.
Results can be affected by many factors:
"Glucose monitoring has become an integral part of diabetes care but has some limitations in accuracy. Accuracy may be limited due to strip manufacturing variances, strip storage, and aging. They may also be due to limitations on the environment such as temperature or altitude or to patient factors such as improper coding, incorrect hand washing, altered hematocrit, or naturally occurring interfering substances. Finally, exogenous interfering substances may contribute errors to the system evaluation of blood glucose."
Not a single reading may be representative. It's the averages that count. You can see this in fig. 1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... gure/fig1/ As the text explains, "the average of a series of values can be perfectly accurate, although none of the individual values is representative of the reference."
Most importantly is the accuracy of the meter itself. The ISO 15197 standard calls for a minimum accuracy of ninety five percent of all measured values to fall within:
20% of glucose values above 75 mg/dl
15 mg of glucose values below 75 mg/dl
In other words, if for the upper range the true value would be 7.0 mmol/L, the meter is deemed accurate if it reports 95% of the time anything between 6.3 mmol/L and 7.7 mmol/L. For the lower range, anything below 4.1 mmol/L is deemed accurate if it is plus or minus 1.0 mmol/L
Now, take that upper range 6.3 to 7.7 which represents meter accuracy and then add strip accuracy, which can vary depending on how it has been stored and the testing environment, which can vary on the temperature and then the accuracy of the blood sample, which can can vary depending on what one has squeezed out of the puncture and also on what contaminants are around, and you have a a lot of reasons to be suspicious about the accuracy of the individual reading. All these factors vary however and tend to level each other out. So, do not get phased by individul readings and keep a record, most meters to anyway, of your averages.