scallywagger
Newbie
- Messages
- 3
Metformin doesn't lower blood glucose - it is supposed to help diabetics but just how seems a bit obscure - stopping the liver releasing glucose is one benefit often mentioned.Forgive my ignorance but what are the health benefits of Metformin other than lowering blood glucose? Given that it can be done by low carbing apparently.
There are 5 things Metforim does in the body, I forget all of them but if you look in the Metformin subforum you will find the list soon enough. I take it because it reduces glucose output by the liver. Lots of people need a bit of helping reducing BG - low carbing isn't always enough for them.Forgive my ignorance but what are the health benefits of Metformin other than lowering blood glucose? Given that it can be done by low carbing apparently.
It is possible to reverse the symptoms of T2 diabetes (blood sugar levels) but the underlying dysfunction that causes T2 will always remain. If your partner stops managing his carb intake, then his BGs will rise again, bc his body is not able to process carbs "normally."Hello, I'm a new member, posting on behalf of my partner. Partner has type 2 diabetes and takes 2000 g Metformin slow release daily. Since December he has been following a strict low carb diet having seen the publicity surrounding the possibility of reversing diabetes and has lost lots of weight. In December his blood test (Hba1c) gave a reading of 51, this had reduced to 36 in May. We decided to get a meter and started testing before and after meals as advised here. The readings have been:
25/5 - pre 5.1, post 4.9.
26/5 - pre 5.5, post 6.8
30/5 - pre 4.6, post 5.4
31/5 - pre 5.3, post 5.0
01/6 - pre 5.6, post 7.7
We have a number of questions if you could help with any answers please. Is it possible to say whether his diabetes has reversed given the above readings? If not, how do people find out when it has? Do people tend to reduce down off the medication to test readings? Given the reported health benefits of Metformin, is there a dose that people are advised to still take?
Forgive my ignorance but what are the health benefits of Metformin other than lowering blood glucose? Given that it can be done by low carbing apparently.
Metformin doesn't cause diarrhoea in most people who take it. I forget what the data says but IIRC it's something like a third? Slow release form often cures it, but not always.Hello, forgive your ignorance, you dont have ignorance, I just wish more doctors and the system out there inform /recommend the same as your post. Excellent post well explained.
Not a doctor, but I view the same as yourself, and if not wrong, yes it does lower blood glucose, which is the symptom of Diabetes 2 yes? and my understanding lowering is all it does, other than on the negative side, has most people if not all running to the toilet, sent me after just 1 hour and 1 tablet, yet inbetween, what is happening to the crux of the problem the Cause, it surely does not get any better as the metformin is simply just lowering blood glucose and nothing else? Also, lowering reversing blood levels can be achieved by low carb exercising and intermittant fasting one or all three, depending on ones situation. I do three and it reversed my levels to normal fasting, 2hr and random, over one year, consistently, reversed levels A1C from 8.1% although an error, down to now 5.5% 5.3% 5%.
There are 5 things Metforim does in the body, I forget all of them but if you look in the Metformin subforum you will find the list soon enough. I take it because it reduces glucose output by the liver. Lots of people need a bit of helping reducing BG - low carbing isn't always enough for them.
No harm in asking.Well I think that may well apply to me. I'm soon to be 76 and reading Rachox's link to Life Extension magazine Metformin, the author suggests ageing causes insulin resistance and hypertension and some cholesterol problems amongst other things [I've got all of those]. He suggests Metformin reduces those things and other things too and recommends it to prediabetics to prevent it becoming full diabetes. Sounds useful - should I ask my GP to go on it?
I can't comment on individual drug choices but in general I have found it best to get my carb intake down as much as I can, then study my BG over several days before thinking about asking to add a medication.Well I think that may well apply to me. I'm soon to be 76 and reading Rachox's link to Life Extension magazine Metformin, the author suggests ageing causes insulin resistance and hypertension and some cholesterol problems amongst other things [I've got all of those]. He suggests Metformin reduces those things and other things too and recommends it to prediabetics to prevent it becoming full diabetes. Sounds useful - should I ask my GP to go on it?
I think your first sentence can apply to most drugs if you swap the name.Metformin appears safe, but there have been doubts raised. Given the initial HbA1c and the turn around I would remove this drug and in its place go for the best qualitative LCHF as possible, with as much diversity as possible. My views are biased on this, as I was incorrectly prescribed Metformin. It did not work well with my kidneys, additionally I believe in minimal drugs unless absolutely essential - I think your case should have been diet and exercise as a first step.
I think with the numbers so far the status is transitive diabetes in remission (I have added the word transitive as I think several quarters of non-diabetic numbers should pass). Others such in the Newcastle Diet trials say remission is below 48 I.e. pre-diabetic and below.
Excellent post information, puts it into perspective in avoidance of any doubts out there especially referring to kidney situation, which is a problem also for many, and yet not for others. Valued comments.Metformin appears safe, but there have been doubts raised. Given the initial HbA1c and the turn around I would remove this drug and in its place go for the best qualitative LCHF as possible, with as much diversity as possible. My views are biased on this, as I was incorrectly prescribed Metformin. It did not work well with my kidneys, additionally I believe in minimal drugs unless absolutely essential - I think your case should have been diet and exercise as a first step.
I think with the numbers so far the status is transitive diabetes in remission (I have added the word transitive as I think several quarters of non-diabetic numbers should pass). Others such in the Newcastle Diet trials say remission is below 48 I.e. pre-diabetic and below.
Metformin appears safe, but there have been doubts raised. Given the initial HbA1c and the turn around I would remove this drug and in its place go for the best qualitative LCHF as possible, with as much diversity as possible. My views are biased on this, as I was incorrectly prescribed Metformin. It did not work well with my kidneys, additionally I believe in minimal drugs unless absolutely essential - I think your case should have been diet and exercise as a first step.
I think with the numbers so far the status is transitive diabetes in remission (I have added the word transitive as I think several quarters of non-diabetic numbers should pass). Others such in the Newcastle Diet trials say remission is below 48 I.e. pre-diabetic and below.
I think your first sentence can apply to most drugs if you swap the name.
I agree that anyone who has known problems with Metformin either before or during treatment with it should weigh up whether to use it or not.
It's not an essential medication by any means. IMO if a person at diagnosis wants to try dietary changes alone, they should feel able to, and then review results after three months.
Not everybody wants to focus on their eating habits with the intensity others do, and IMO that is OK. We can't know what is going on in the lives of others, so I try to be cautious about firmly stressing the benefits of dietary changes, at least until I get to know the person a bit more.
The problem for me with this perspective, is that the default position is to push Metformin (and most likely statins) on an ignorant recipient for me this is bad practice. I had a HbA1c in old money of 134, within 1 week dropped my blood sugar readings by 20%, yet was still prescribed Metformin when I was wet between the ears; had I been given non biased advice I could have dropped more as I was still having carbs like home made soda bread and home made banana cake (thinking these were good for me).I think your first sentence can apply to most drugs if you swap the name.
I agree that anyone who has known problems with Metformin either before or during treatment with it should weigh up whether to use it or not.
It's not an essential medication by any means. IMO if a person at diagnosis wants to try dietary changes alone, they should feel able to, and then review results after three months.
Not everybody wants to focus on their eating habits with the intensity others do, and IMO that is OK. We can't know what is going on in the lives of others, so I try to be cautious about firmly stressing the benefits of dietary changes, at least until I get to know the person a bit more.
VERY INTERESTING, thanks @Rachox ! I'm a skinny diabetic and just cannot seem to put on weight, I've next to no fat having lost about 14 or more pounds.I'm currently about 8st. After diagnosis I was prescribed 80mg Gliclazide and this with LCHF brought my HbA1c into 'remission levels' and the GP reduced the dose to 40 mg and then stopped medication as my HbA1c was still good. My numbers then rose and I'm back on gliclazide now. The GP did suggest Metfomin, but having heard about the digestive side effects I said I'd stick with the glilazide as I knew it worked as far as my BG was concerned.Just to clarify how Metformin works, for those of you that are interested, here’s a paragraph from the article I linked above:
“An ideal anti-diabetic drug would enhance cellular insulin sensitivity, inhibit excess intestinal absorption of sugar, reduce excess liver production of glucose, promote weight loss and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. Metformin (Glucophage) is the one drug that does all of this and more.
Metformin works by increasing the number of muscle and adipocyte (fat cell) insulin receptors and the attraction for the receptor. It does not increase insulin secretion, it only increases insulin sensitivity. Therefore, metformin is not associated with causing hypoglycemia. This activity reduces insulin levels by increasing the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to the effects of insulin by rejuvenating the response, and restoring glucose and insulin to younger physiological levels that may cause weight loss and most certainly a decrease in the body's total fat content.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?