A GTT 50 yrs ago gave me a diagnosis of "impaired glucose metabolism." No mention ever of "pre-diabetes." I am now 80. Annual fasting blood tests showed fasting serum glucose in range 5.1 to 6.6mmol/L. Then in Feb 2019 it was 7.3 (56 mmol/m). Repeat test in June 2019 showed 7.3 with HbA1c of 7.3%. In Sept 2019, a blood test 2 hrs after b'fast (yoghurt and oats) showed serum glucose 5.9 and HbA1c of 6.8%. I managed a 6kg weight loss from Feb 2019. My last test in Dec 2019 showed serum glucose of 5.3 (non-fasting) and HbA1c of 6.5% (48 mmol/m).
In Feb 2019, my regular GP said that I had Type 2 diabetes and rattled off a list of foods that I should not eat. Another doctor in the practice said that at 80 I had nothing to worry about with HbA1c of 7.3%. I do not know what to think. My latest non-fasting serum glucose was 5.3 (lab normal range 3.0-7.7 mmol/L). So I feel that a glucose monitor will tell me nothing, except that I am normal. The HbA1c worries me and I feel that I must try to get it down further and below 6.1% (43 mmol/m). Why the difference in diagnosis between the two parameters? I would be so grateful for any advice. Kind regards, Bryan
In Feb 2019, my regular GP said that I had Type 2 diabetes and rattled off a list of foods that I should not eat. Another doctor in the practice said that at 80 I had nothing to worry about with HbA1c of 7.3%. I do not know what to think. My latest non-fasting serum glucose was 5.3 (lab normal range 3.0-7.7 mmol/L). So I feel that a glucose monitor will tell me nothing, except that I am normal. The HbA1c worries me and I feel that I must try to get it down further and below 6.1% (43 mmol/m). Why the difference in diagnosis between the two parameters? I would be so grateful for any advice. Kind regards, Bryan