pumppimp
Well-Known Member
Not wanting to get into a low carb debate, but would just like to get your opinions on a talk I had at university today. I study environmental science, although I specialise in micro, I'm trying to get more into the chemical aspects which will help with jobs etc. The talk was by a professor who works for marine scotland on pollutants in the environment and how they end up in organisms (foucusing mainly on marine flora and fauna). As we had talked about lots of different carcinogens and endocrine disrupters a question was asked from the audience and I was intrigued to find the answer.
It was do people with endocrine conditions have their samples analysed at the hospital to search for traces of these dangerous pollutants. The simple answer was no mainly because they understand so much about animals because they are able to collect and analyse dead bodies, and also to collect and disect other specimens. They had discovered that dog whelks in Aberdeen harbour had both male and female sex organs beacuse of a chemical used to stop growth of organisms on ships hulls. The chemical was later banned and the dog whelk population is now back to normal.
My main point was that the prof then started on a bit of a personal rant about fats. He himself trys wherever possible not to eat any and also limits the amount of meat fish dairy etc. His reason is that the pollutants that are most toxic and hang around causing more damage in an organism are hydrophobic (they don't like water) so therefore when introduced to tissues they accumulate in fats. These chemicals then bioaccumulate up the food chain, causing cancer, endocrine conditions etc. This is why he aviods fats at all costs.
What are your thoughts on this?
It was do people with endocrine conditions have their samples analysed at the hospital to search for traces of these dangerous pollutants. The simple answer was no mainly because they understand so much about animals because they are able to collect and analyse dead bodies, and also to collect and disect other specimens. They had discovered that dog whelks in Aberdeen harbour had both male and female sex organs beacuse of a chemical used to stop growth of organisms on ships hulls. The chemical was later banned and the dog whelk population is now back to normal.
My main point was that the prof then started on a bit of a personal rant about fats. He himself trys wherever possible not to eat any and also limits the amount of meat fish dairy etc. His reason is that the pollutants that are most toxic and hang around causing more damage in an organism are hydrophobic (they don't like water) so therefore when introduced to tissues they accumulate in fats. These chemicals then bioaccumulate up the food chain, causing cancer, endocrine conditions etc. This is why he aviods fats at all costs.
What are your thoughts on this?