Most GP's are far too busy doing private consultations outside of their normal surgery hours to have the time to keep up to date.
Most GPs are extremely busy just doing NHS stuff and cover an enormous range of subjects. I'll be honest I prefer the USA system in many ways which I experienced when I lived in the USA. You can visit a GP if you are not clear what the problem is but you can select a specialist (from the Yellow Pages as it was then) if you prefer; either way you pay. I don't believe the current system can prevail for much longer as there is no way GPs can keep up adequately on everything in Primary Care.
I absolutely agree. I was lucky and worked for a big corporate with private health care. I came across many who had been hit by unexpected health care issues and were left with nothing. I think we can retain the NHS but with some big changes.It is a bad country to be poor in the USA.
D.
It is a bad country to be poor in the USA.
D.
It is a bad country to be poor in the USA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_the_United_States
I so much agree with desidiabulum: a good doctor is someone who is clever enough to listen and to learn from whatever reliable source he/she can find. And yes, I definitely expect a doctor to be able to tell a reliable source from a hole in the ground.I think that the test of a good GP is not what they know (impossible to keep abreast of everything) but their willingness to listen, to keep an open mind, and to look up information online in your presence if they're not sure of something. My GP has all these qualities and I never cease to be grateful -- it helped to identify a different serious health issue. The GP at the same practice who is the resident diabetes 'expert' unquestionably knows more about diabetes than the GP whom I now use, but won't listen or check anything, which is why I switched.
You certainly have this nailed down. Good for you.Most GP's are far too busy doing private consultations outside of their normal surgery hours to have the time to keep up to date.
Fortunately I am on good terms with the specialist diabetic doctor at the surgery and demanded that he be called in to the consultation and this new doctor was less than impressed to be put in his place infront of a patient. It did make me wonder exactly how much time doctors spend learning about diabetes when they are training because going by this I doubt he had read more than you find in the home medical books.
My old Practice just selected a gp to be responsible for overseeing diabetics. In practice thiseant that he oversaw the reaching of DES/QOF targets for Diabetics. He had no extra knowledge of diabetes or interest in diabetes at all.
This really is completely untrue. GP's have to keep up to date, but considering the wealth of information and medical complaints it's practically impossible to keep up to date on everything. I wouldn't expect my GP to know as much as I do as I actually have the conditionMost GP's are far too busy doing private consultations outside of their normal surgery hours to have the time to keep up to date.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?