I was prompted by a post in the thread "cured" to look again at the traditional FBG cut off points for T2. Some may find this article interesting:
Glucose can also start killing beta cells at levels below 140. One study found that people with fasting blood glucose from 110–125 (within the official “prediabetic” range) had already lost up to 40% of their beta cell mass.
Italian researchers found that even with glucose levels in the supposedly “normal” range, beta cells started to fail. Ruhl says that researchers “found that with every small increase in the 2-hour glucose tolerance test result, there was a corresponding increase in…beta cell failure. The higher a person’s blood sugar rose within ‘normal’ range, the more beta cells were failing.”
Failing beta cells will lead to worsening diabetes, a truly vicious cycle. Slightly elevated glucose has also been shown to cause eye damage (“retinopathy”) and increased rates of heart disease, kidney damage, and stroke.
https://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/blog/new-research-on-high-glucose-levels/
I thought the problem with research into beta cells dying was that there was no way to measure it apart from an autopsy. What technique did they use?I was prompted by a post in the thread "cured" to look again at the traditional FBG cut off points for T2. Some may find this article interesting:
Glucose can also start killing beta cells at levels below 140. One study found that people with fasting blood glucose from 110–125 (within the official “prediabetic” range) had already lost up to 40% of their beta cell mass.
Italian researchers found that even with glucose levels in the supposedly “normal” range, beta cells started to fail. Ruhl says that researchers “found that with every small increase in the 2-hour glucose tolerance test result, there was a corresponding increase in…beta cell failure. The higher a person’s blood sugar rose within ‘normal’ range, the more beta cells were failing.”
Failing beta cells will lead to worsening diabetes, a truly vicious cycle. Slightly elevated glucose has also been shown to cause eye damage (“retinopathy”) and increased rates of heart disease, kidney damage, and stroke.
https://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/blog/new-research-on-high-glucose-levels/
From the first link in Tannith's post:I thought the problem with research into beta cells dying was that there was no way to measure it apart from an autopsy. What technique did they use?
Indeed. The 48 for diagnosis is almost completely arbitrary, being misapplied by medics, and not much practical use to the patient. Many of us report diabetic symptoms occurring at BG levels well below 48 and years before formal diagnosis. All this is well known. The issue is early intervention and adoption of a low-carb diet as soon as BGs start to rise."Keeping normal numbers may require extraordinary effort. It may require very low carbohydrate intake."
Odd you didn't quote this part.
From the first link in Tannith's post:
"At the Mayo Clinic some of these difficulties are overcome. Autopsies are performed within 12 h of death (usually <6 h), including weekends. The Mayo Clinic integrated medical record system allows easy access to the prior clinical records of the cases. As the Mayo Clinic tends to be the primary health care provider for people hospitalized at the medical center for their final illness, most of the autopsy cases have had a general medical examination (including a fasting blood glucose) during the year before death.
In the present study, we took advantage of the unique autopsy material available at the Mayo Clinic to study 124 human pancreata from cases with and without diabetes and matched for obesity. All cases had a well-preserved pancreatic specimen and documented general medical exam, including a fasting blood glucose obtained during the 12 months before death."
With the insulin resistance of obesity, a given β-cell mass chronically secretes more insulin. β-cell mass as determined from study of cadaver pancreases is increased in obese subjects, but only modestly, with estimates being only about 20–50% more than that of normal weight individuals 11,12,31. Yet, the rate of insulin secretion over a 24-hour period is 100% more than normal
There have been a number of hemi-pancreas transplants done in humans such that individual donate about 50% of their pancreas to a recipient with T1D, but it has become clear that the donors have increased risk of developing diabetes. A follow-up study published in 2008 evaluated 15 donors who had hemi-pancreatectomies at the University of Minnesota between 1997 and 2003, with the finding that 43% had either glucose intolerance or diabetes 82. Another study followed 37 patients after removal of about 50% of their pancreases for either benign or malignant neoplasms and found similar results
I think it says 70 to 130 is the target level. 3.9 to 7.2 mmol/L.Would anyone care to translate the numbers into UK ones please?
70 appears to be 3.9 which even my non diabetic people don't get as a rule, so how can it be a dangerous level?
It's saying 3.9 to 7.2 before meals, and 10 after meals, which is actually a bit weaker than the NICE recommendations for adults. My understanding is the 48 (6.5 in old units) hba1c recommendation was chosen because few people had eye issues if they kept under it.Would anyone care to translate the numbers into UK ones please?
My FBG was 5.6 this morning on waking.7.2 before meals seems a bit high as a target?
@Tannith what are your own pre meal bg levels like?
But what about your pre meal readings? And the post meal readings? I thought that maybe you were worried about them as your post #13 seems to indicate?My FBG was 5.6 this morning on waking.
I almost never take pre or post meal readings. Haven't done so since around 2017. But my 2 hour ogt is 10.9, JUST below the diabetic level, at the very top of the prediabetic range. I took it recently for the first time in 8/9 months. It is the nearest thing I have to a post meal reading.But what about your pre meal readings? And the post meal readings? I thought that maybe you were worried about them as your post #13 seems to indicate?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?