Hi. Yes, you can be both which is called double diabetes. If you are a Late onset T1 (LADA) with a failing pancreas but also have too many carbs and have excess weight you can develop insulin resistance which is the typical T2 symptom. It took around 8 years for my mis-diagnosed T1.5 to become bad enough for insulin. Note that some T1.5s don't show a high GAD (such as myself) due to other causes of islet failure such as viruses and pancreatitis. Also, the GAD test becomes less reliable as the diabetes progresses. The c-peptide test can be more useful as it proves (or not) that you have low insulin which is what really matters.
Hi @the_anticarbYou can have a non functioning pancreas AND insulin resistance. Happened to me after my pregnancies and massive weght gain. I got into a vicious cycle of taking more insulin to bring the sugars down, gaining weight, becoming increasingly insulin resistant and having to take yet more insulin. Horrible, horrible, situation to be in.
Luckily I got put on Dapaglifozin in addition to other meds which helped me get the insulin down, the weight off and now at a normal weight I am no longer insulin resistant.
Hi @Crimsonclient , so whats your GAD n other antibodies test reading? Im a bit concern now as my doctor put me on strong medication and it managed to control around 10mmol in the first 2 to 3 weeks, now it goes back up to 12mmol in morning, sometime i got 17mmol... now im on straight Low carb diet n vegi only in dinner to see if it helps to managed it down. Im scare to go on insulinHi @yycdordor I have just been changed from type 2 to type 1 LADA or as some put it type 1.5. It's a lot to get your head around so best advice is to look around a bit
You'd need to provide the units of that test to be clear, but from this page, (and normally in the UK and research) if the units are U/ml, your results appear to be in the positive result zone.Hi Daibel, thanks!! Just wonder if GAD is 54.4 is defined as high?!
Hi Tim, its U/mlYou'd need to provide the units of that test to be clear, but from this page, (and normally in the UK and research) if the units are U/ml, your results appear to be in the positive result zone.
Reference Range
Results shoulf be interpreted as follows
Negative result is 0-5.0 U/ml
Equivocal result is 5.1-25.0 U/ml
Positive result is >25.0 U/ml
If it's in U/ml, according to that NHS website you have an overwhelmingly positive result there.Hi Tim, its U/ml
That's an excellent point and a perfect example of why "Type 2 diabetes" isn't something specific, but rather a group of uncategorized forms of diabetes.You could also still be type 2 and just have the same as what I do... insulin deficiency. I think a lot of people forget about that for type 2's. Most people assume type 2's all have their own insulin being produced. When I questioned about the destruction of beta cells for people with type 2 with my endocrinologist he did tell me that it varies from person to person. So my guess is some have insulin deficiency a lot sooner than others. Then others may be fortunate to never have insulin deficiency. I like to think of type 2 as a disease with stages as that has been my experience. The downside to what I have is everyone tries to make out you must be type 1.5 or type 1 and you have to reassure you're definitely type 2.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?