borofergie
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,169
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Racism, Sexism, Homophobia
:shock:jopar said:If a book is expressing a controversial view point, the author usually uses a 'sales pitch' style of writing mainly because they've got to 'sale' the idea to the reader!
borofergie said:Education is very rarely a bad thing. You just need to make sure that you read books from people expressing a variety of views. The word that is used to describe someone that doesn't read any books is "ignorant".
As I dis-spell both theories, I eat complex carbs and I also eat saturated fats, (I don't follow a reduced fat diet) yet my cholesterol levels are good, so can only assume that there's something else going on apart from just the food we chose to eat!
Pumping with Accu-chek Spirit pump since June '08
jopar
noblehead said:borofergie said:Education is very rarely a bad thing. You just need to make sure that you read books from people expressing a variety of views. The word that is used to describe someone that doesn't read any books is "ignorant".
Stephen I do have A-levels and went to University in my twenties to study so your preaching to the converted when it comes to education!
The books I choose to read are probably somewhat different to your own going by what you write on the forum but it's reading nonetheless, I would never ever call someone who doesn't read books ''ignorant'' as there could be number of reasons why they don't read, an educated man wouldn't use such language IMHO.
borofergie said:The word that is used to describe someone that doesn't read any books is "ignorant".
noblehead said:borofergie said:The word that is used to describe someone that doesn't read any books is "ignorant".
borofergie said:Sorry Nigel - you were advocating not reading controversial books earlier. I gave you a list of controversial books that included Wealth of Nations, Das Kapital and Origin of Species. I wondered how you made the arbitrary distinction between those controversial books and the ones about cholesterol that you appear to disagree with.
noblehead wrote
you may want to explain to the members of the forum why you think people who don't read books are ''ignorant''.....
borofergie said:noblehead said:I don't (despite what some may say) have any problems with these 'sceptics' releasing books and people buying them, after all there's some good money to be made from being controversial and they'll always be a small minority that will buy into their theories.
Re: cholesterol and diabetes
Unread postby librarising » 30 minutes ago
noblehead wrote
you may want to explain to the members of the forum why you think people who don't read books are ''ignorant''.....
He doesn't need to explain to me.
I understood him to mean that people who wilfully choose not to understand at a deeper level, which usually only a book can help them do, what an author is saying, don't therefore fully know the arguments of those with possibly different theories.
The term for not knowing is ignorance.
noblehead said:Thanks for the apology Stephen but you may want to explain to the members of the forum why you think people who don't read books are ''ignorant''..... :?
noblehead said:noblehead said:Thanks for the apology Stephen but you may want to explain to the members of the forum why you think people who don't read books are ''ignorant''..... :?
Still waiting for a reply Stephen.
Mileana wrote
Noblehead... Could you consider instead of mocking the man for his viewpoints to either add some reasons why you think as you do about the actual topic, or ask him to provide some evidence.
Patch said:YAY!!! The OLD Diabetes.co.uk is back - how I've missed you!
Funny that, although a HUGE number of users were banned/left/run out of town, these arguments have returned? Could it be that the people that were banned/left, weren't the problem after all?
If you have any proof of this, or you have any suspicious, please drop me a PM and I'll investigate further.Sid Bonkers said:Patch said:YAY!!! The OLD Diabetes.co.uk is back - how I've missed you!
Funny that, although a HUGE number of users were banned/left/run out of town, these arguments have returned? Could it be that the people that were banned/left, weren't the problem after all?
No, its because all those members that were banned for causing trouble are all back again using different usernames :thumbdown:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?