Robinredbreast
Oracle
- Messages
- 18,446
- Location
- Planet Earth
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Insulin
- Dislikes
- Bullies, Liars, Trolls and dishonest cruel people
Small country town in rual australia.
i think i'll pass, whats next weeks special offer, lucky dip on the eggs with salmonella..good grief.
Sainsbury's you say..Nice to know those who are really taking it seriously and those happy to just keep making a buck regardless of the unnecessary risks to the public..
Very little has been said about the particular risks of Coronavirus to PWD.
In effect, if you have a pre-existing condition then the risk of death is increased to around 10%; risk of critical illness increased to around 40% if you "catch" Coronavirus. The medical term for these increases in morbidity (death rates) is comorbidity.
As they are not going to be doing much testing here in the UK, our stats will be skewed and inaccurate anyway, and useless for any purpose except death rate,
IF they test all those who die.
Point taken... But if it's a good idea Monday.
Why isn't it a good idea right now.
Not much to do except to tell people.?
Fully understand you are just passing on information... Not a dig at your in any way.
Apologies if it seemed that way.
This is just going downhill so fast..
Watching the news and seeing the numbers mount across Europe.
As they are not going to be doing much testing here in the UK, our stats will be skewed and inaccurate anyway, and useless for any purpose except death rate, IF they test all those who die.
Can anyone else smell rats round here?
Any inquest will be able to mitigate the reasons if you have high bp and T2D.Just to point out that if they do less testing of those with mild or no symptoms, then that would make the percentage dying much higher, which hardly seems likely to be the aim of some conspiracy.
I watched the briefingJust head from son in Dublin that there is a rumour going round that Ireland will be in Lockdown come Monday.
I don't understand your reply. What I meant was, if there are 10 deaths, and they have tested 1,000 people, that's a 1% death rate, if they test 10,000 people with the same 10 deaths then that's a 0.1% death rate. So an implication that they are not testing to make the figures better is not logical.Any inquest will be able to mitigate the reasons if you high bp and T2D.
Well I guess by only testing the most seriously ill the apparent infected total will be lowerI don't understand your reply. What I meant was, if there are 10 deaths, and they have tested 1,000 people, that's a 1% death rate, if they test 10,000 people with the same 10 deaths then that's a 0.1% death rate. So an implication that they are not testing to make the figures better is not logical.
That just says death is quicker than recovery, which I understand takes many weeks for some people. China looked awful in the early days too and now looks much improved on those early figures.With the latest figures in the U.K., more people have died (21) than have recovered (18).
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
With the latest figures in the U.K., more people have died (21) than have recovered (18).
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
I would disagree.That's a pointless snapshot statistic from a fast changing situation.
Well I guess by only testing the most seriously ill the apparent infected total will be lower
but the death rate will be meaningless.
The only accurate figures will be the actual numbers seriously ill and dead. And these hospitalised cases will be the only way to compare the success of the U.K. strategy against other places.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?