https://www.healthline.com/health-n...5088831#COVID-19-cases-increasing-in-childrenWent back to school yesterday and not slept a wink this week. Asked for outside duty as a reasonable adjustment and although I have one outside they need so many duties now, they couldn’t give me two outside and basically said no but it will be in a bigger inside area. I explained I want to minimise contact with other students I don’t teach. Feel really rubbish.
Sounds very plausible the way it’s described. Would be good if they can confirm this and finally have a more defined strategy for treatments widely known about.A Supercomputer Analyzed Covid-19 — and an Interesting New Theory Has Emerged https://elemental.medium.com/a-supe...teresting-new-theory-has-emerged-31cb8eba9d63
Interesting article.
since the end of May COVID-19 diagnoses are up 720 percent in children in the United States compared to 270 percent for all Americans.
"diagnoses" actually. I would say those were "cases"."positive test results" not cases.
More people are not being admitted to hospital or dying.
Here is my prediction:Give it a few weeks and reality will over take all our reasoned arguments and it may be a costly lesson to learn I sincerely hope all will be well and our government will have finally got something right despite all our misgivings.
Perfect solution - genuinely - if only that would work and could happen without starvation, eviction, job losses, exams and schooling missed etc etc . For that to be an option it needs supporting.How about those of us that are scared stay in a bubble and then let everyone else get on with their lives ?
It is just that you seem keen to prove your idea that children are vectors of infection for this thing when the experience of Europe and latterly Scotland just hasn't shown this. Kids do transmit the flu very easily and the common cold but their innate immune systems seem to repel this one so those cases do not represent hospitalisations much less deaths nor do they link to community outbreaks but please share if you've found any such situations?"diagnoses" actually. I would say those were "cases". And I find your comment about me allegedly wishing more people were dying profoundly offensive.
It would be genuinely cheaper to support those in the shielding category (you know if this is you) than it is to run down the rest of the economy. I would support that in a heartbeat and believe that our communities would do the same but I suspect you are including those that are merely fearful which of course would cast the net too far.Perfect solution - genuinely - if only that would work and could happen without starvation, eviction, job losses, exams and schooling missed etc etc . For that to be an option it needs supporting.
Perhaps those clinically vulnerable and clinically extremely vulnerable could have the option to opt in or out? This making it truly voluntary how to approach the virus.It would be genuinely cheaper to support those in the shielding category (you know if this is you) than it is to run down the rest of the economy. I would support that in a heartbeat and believe that our communities would do the same but I suspect you are including those that are merely fearful which of course would cast the net too far.
Or perhaps we could ask the very elderly or other shielded whether they genuinely wish for these measures to be done on their behalf?
Sorry because I don't want to belittle anyone's fear which I understand is a very real thing and not a 'mere' thing as i wrongly said. I meet fearful people where i work (elderly members of the gym I work in) and never tell them they are wrong but then equally I won't nod along either!Perhaps those clinically vulnerable and clinically extremely vulnerable could have the option to opt in or out? This making it truly voluntary how to approach the virus.
Putting all those not categorised as fearful in the terms you have is dismissive and derogatory. Only time will tell if fear is warranted or not. Conspiracy is not such if they really are out to get you.
Wishing you all the best for tomorrow Max. Hopefully all will work out well for you and all the others in similar situations.Maybe a few of us are just hoping to be around long enough to see what the consequences are Nicole!!
Sure I'm very concerned. Remember though it was the Government who told me originally I am clinically vulnerable. Wouldn't have batted an eyelid otherwise. Now they are saying it's all fine for me to go back to work. If I were still a van driver I wouldn't be worried. If I were still a Football Coach or an Insurance Rep I wouldn't be worried because I know in those jobs I would be able to safeguard myself pretty well. However schools are the big unknown, and I'm not particularly looking forward to being in a Tutor Group with a kid who has a habit of spitting at staff when he is in a mood. Bad enough when there isn't a pandemic about! Not really looking forward to spending days in class with kids and staff who don't have to wear masks either. I'm fearful because my safety is out of my hands in this particular vocation but I don't have a choice if I want to put food on the table and there aren't any other options available to me.
It's not just me either. How can I visit my mum at her care home if I don't know what I'm bringing back from the school? There are many reasons to be fearful, it's not just one reason. As I said if I was out in the open air teaching the kids again how to score a free kick or driving around I wouldn't be over worried.
https://www.healthline.com/health-n...5088831#COVID-19-cases-increasing-in-childrenIt is just that you seem keen to prove your idea that children are vectors of infection for this thing when the experience of Europe and latterly Scotland just hasn't shown this. Kids do transmit the flu very easily and the common cold but their innate immune systems seem to repel this one so those cases do not represent hospitalisations much less deaths nor do they link to community outbreaks but please share if you've found any such situations?
I would add - vulnerable children to go back to school as well. There are a lot of children with hidden, and not so hidden vulnerabilitieshttps://www.healthline.com/health-n...5088831#COVID-19-cases-increasing-in-children
I think it is unsafe for vulnerable/over age 60 teachers and school support staff to go back to work. You go back if you want to, that's your choice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?