1. Get the Diabetes Forum App for your phone - available on iOS and Android.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the Diabetes Forum Survey 2021 »
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Diabetes Forum should not be used in an emergency and does not replace your healthcare professional relationship. Posts can be seen by the public.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Guest, stay home, stay safe, save the NHS. Stay up to date with information about keeping yourself and people around you safe here and GOV.UK: Coronavirus (COVID-19). Think you have symptoms? NHS 111 service is available here.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Join the community »

COVID the real numbers? Not all doom and gloom.

Discussion in 'Diabetes Discussions' started by bulkbiker, Sep 3, 2020.

  1. bulkbiker

    bulkbiker Type 2 · Oracle

    Messages:
    18,393
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    Trophy Points:
    298
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. bulkbiker

    bulkbiker Type 2 · Oracle

    Messages:
    18,393
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    Trophy Points:
    298
  3. JoKalsbeek

    JoKalsbeek I reversed my Type 2 · Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,710
    Likes Received:
    3,469
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Am I reading it right? They're putting the percentage of deaths against the population. Not against infected population. Quite a few people didn't "survive" corona in that equation, they never had it to begin with. So isn't that a bit skewed then? (Though I am horrible with numbers and get kind of lost in articles like this... Do correct me if I'm wrong!).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Brunneria

    Brunneria Other · Guru
    Retired Moderator

    Messages:
    21,795
    Likes Received:
    35,045
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Why do you think it is odd?

    The more tests that are run, the more asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases are caught - which hopefully puts those people into quarantine, so that they don't go around spreading the virus further.
    Evidence of this is where virus hotspots are found amongst healthy workers, then the rest of the farm/factory/processing plant/school is tested and the virus is found in many young, healthy, asymptomatic workers.

    The longer the pandemic continues, the better the treatments become, the more information and research is done, and the quicker people are receiving interventions which then reduce the need for hospitalisations.
    Plenty of evidence of this in the medications that are found to be effective, and are hitting the news on a regular basis.

    Also, the longer the pandemic continues, the better (some) societies are getting at letting the young and less vulnerable got out and get themselves infected, and pass it around, building up 'community/herd immunity, while simultaneously, the more vulnerable are (hopefully) staying safer and more protected - assuming that the younger ones don't take the virus home and infect their vulnerable nearest and dearest.
    Evidence of this is the huge numbers of deaths amongst the vulnerable in the early days, when the virus was imported into care homes by asymptomatic visitors and staff.

    Absolutely nothing 'odd' about any of those things.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Like Like x 3
  5. bulkbiker

    bulkbiker Type 2 · Oracle

    Messages:
    18,393
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    Trophy Points:
    298
    It's the best way to look at population level risk I guess.
    The kind of risk calculation most of us don't even think about when we get in the car or on our bikes because its such a rare event that we know the likelihood of it happening to us is tiny.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. bulkbiker

    bulkbiker Type 2 · Oracle

    Messages:
    18,393
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Because if we have more and more "infected" and the "pandemic" is so dreadful we should be seeing more and more people being hospitalised and dying. It really is that simple.

    Remember that all these positive test results are from people who have been out and about in their community before getting tested, allegedly spreading COVID like some latter day black death (or at least that is what some would have us believe).
    That is not what is happening.

    The accuracy of the test of course might be the other issue.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. Brunneria

    Brunneria Other · Guru
    Retired Moderator

    Messages:
    21,795
    Likes Received:
    35,045
    Trophy Points:
    298
    I disagree, and see no reason why you come to that conclusion.
    Unless you are saying that if a new treatment or way to handle a disease (that has killed hundreds of thousands of people) evolves (through research or new best practice), then that disease should magically be re-classified as a non-dangerous disease, backdated to its discovery?
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  8. lucylocket61

    lucylocket61 Type 2 · Expert

    Messages:
    5,611
    Likes Received:
    2,411
    Trophy Points:
    178
    The figures dont take into account those with long tail covid, or permanent lung, heart, liver etc damage. Its not all about death or life.

    Think of all those who survived polio, for example, but were damaged and then got the late effects of polio in later life. Or those who appeared to be unaffected by having polio and then got the late effects later one.

    Its not as clear cut as live or die. I hope, soon, these figures will start to be collected.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 2
  9. stu60

    stu60 Type 2 · Active Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    43
    The way I see it is that they are finding more cases due to the increase in testing, but the number of people who are critically ill has decreased dramatically, and most now have only mild or no symptoms. Whether that is because the majority of the weak, infirm etc have already been infected and or the virus has mutated to a less virulent strain which seems to be the nature of these things.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  10. NicoleC1971

    NicoleC1971 Type 1 · Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,958
    Likes Received:
    1,789
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Thanks. My dad has risked giving my 94 year old grandma a hug (risked not only in the Covid sense but the possibility he won't be able to visit again because he's broken their rules).
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/b006qshd
    This is Tim Harford the author. Seemingly the only person in the BBC who is calming holding the various agencies to task on the numbers around the virus on More or Less i.e. a real journalist.
     
  11. DCUKMod

    DCUKMod I reversed my Type 2 · Master
    Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    8,226
    Trophy Points:
    298
    I haven't read the Mail article, but in the car this morning, I hard the generator of these stats, Tim Hartford, saying he had actually made an error in the bath stat.

    The COVID stats are on a given day, the bath is over the course of a year. He was very keen to point out that that one was actually, plain apples and pears.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. lucylocket61

    lucylocket61 Type 2 · Expert

    Messages:
    5,611
    Likes Received:
    2,411
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Would you mind expanding on this? What, and where, are the correct stats?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. zand

    zand Type 2 · Master

    Messages:
    10,082
    Likes Received:
    16,096
    Trophy Points:
    298
    I agree that the accuracy of the test could be an issue.
    You also need to remember that back in March when I caught it they were only testing people who had a known contact who had travelled to a known hotspot. There were many like me who knew they had COVID but were encouraged to stay at home unless their lips were turning blue! I and many others were never tested. So the increase in infections now may not be a true increase at all.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. NicoleC1971

    NicoleC1971 Type 1 · Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,958
    Likes Received:
    1,789
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Our own government has classified it as follows:
    Status of COVID-19
    As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.
    The CDC in the US has also pointed out that 95% of the deaths with Covid involved had co morbidities which does bring into question how we have handled the statistics. It is certainly a nasty virus but we are hyper focussed on it compared to other years where excess deaths have occurred to the same or a greater extent from nasty flus with ineffective vaccinations.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. JoKalsbeek

    JoKalsbeek I reversed my Type 2 · Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,710
    Likes Received:
    3,469
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ah, yes... That makes sense. Thank you. :)
     
  16. lucylocket61

    lucylocket61 Type 2 · Expert

    Messages:
    5,611
    Likes Received:
    2,411
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Are you sure of this date? Before the huge number of deaths and lockdown?

    That shows how out of touch the government were. Perhaps not the point you intended to make.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Brunneria

    Brunneria Other · Guru
    Retired Moderator

    Messages:
    21,795
    Likes Received:
    35,045
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Reclassifying a disease as we learn more about it makes perfect sense.
    Claiming that it is 'odd' that fewer people are dying as treatment and management protocols improve, does not make sense.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  18. DCUKMod

    DCUKMod I reversed my Type 2 · Master
    Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    8,226
    Trophy Points:
    298
    I have no idea, but if you listened, on iPlayer, to the Jeremy Vine Show (Vanessa Feltz is sitting in this week), Tim Harford was guesting there. It would have been around the 12:20 mark, although I didn't specifically look at the clock at the time. The timing is calculated from other things I was doing at the time - errands and so on.

    Sorry not to be more specific, but I had no idea it'd be useful information later.
     
  19. bulkbiker

    bulkbiker Type 2 · Oracle

    Messages:
    18,393
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    Trophy Points:
    298
    As does flu every year and we have a vaccine for that ..
    Luckily we can agree to disagree on this one.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. NicoleC1971

    NicoleC1971 Type 1 · Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,958
    Likes Received:
    1,789
    Trophy Points:
    198
    I don' think it is odd either but I think the reason lies in the natural decline of the virus which shows similar sharp peaks and then steady declines in most of the European countries regardless of their policies. Fortunately there are also better treatments.
    What is odd is that mainstream media is again focusing on case numbers with the implication that these will lead to hospitalisations and deaths whereas they don't seem to be.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  • Meet the Community

    Find support, connect with others, ask questions and share your experiences with people with diabetes, their carers and family.

    Did you know: 7 out of 10 people improve their understanding of diabetes within 6 months of being a Diabetes Forum member. Get the Diabetes Forum App and stay connected on iOS and Android

    Grab the app!
  • Tweet with us

  • Like us on Facebook