That's one of the most valuable things you can do. Also, I appreciate you elaborating a bit more about your situation. That makes it easier to understand your situation.I'll check out this forum more often. Cheers.
<snip>
Active? I play squash twice a week, I do 20 minutes on an exercise bike 2-3 times a week and I play golf twice - three times a week. I'm not sure how active that makes me. And my waist is 36.5 ins.
The message I've got therefore is that I should try to lower my BMI to the mid range level and that my 36.5 inch waist needs to be reduced. I will continue to eat as few carbs as I can (ie less pasta, rice and potatoes). I don't monitor what I eat on a daily basis closely (ie porridge in the morning but I guess reasonably balanced) so I don't know what effect my current diet is having on my short and long-term blood sugar levels? Any other advice is welcome. I'll check out this forum more often. Cheers.
Sorry but I was not referring to the ND except in the quote from the Guardian. I am Low Carb High Fat with occasional fasting days. Controls my sugars without meds. RegardsHi @haf and welcome. The Newcastle diet/study has worked for a number of people. That is based on shakes etc of 800 calories a day. There are a number of threads on this. This is not low carb. This was what @bulkbiker was referring to. So not all suggestions are low carb. I wanted to try this when diagnosed but as my GP would not give me his backing I did my weight loss a lot slower eating 500 calories less per day than I was burning. All I can say is I do have some control but do not think mine is reversed. I also reduced carbs, using a meter to see which ones spiked me.
Thankfully, though, I've never been on Gliclazide.
It encourages your pancreas to produce more insulin and this could mean that the beta cells wear out more quickly meaning you will need to inject insulin sooner.Why thankfully no Gliclazide? Does it have bad side effects?
About what? Getting a gliclazide prescription?mmmm ... maybe I should speak to my diabetic nurse?
I have yet to see any sort of scientific proof to support this theory. It seems to be nothing more than a rumor created on one of the Internet diabetes forums.and this could mean that the beta cells wear out more quickly meaning you will need to inject insulin sooner.
I agree. I was worried about this when I was on max dose Glic for many years and saw these concerns on the web but I have also never seen any research data on it. So, the Jury is still out....I have yet to see any sort of scientific proof to support this theory. It seems to be nothing more than a rumor created on one of the Internet diabetes forums.
If you think about it, if your beta cells could "Wear out" we'd probably have many more elderly people diagnosed with type 1 after 80+ years of life.I agree. I was worried about this when I was on max dose Glic for many years and saw these concerns on the web but I have also never seen any research data on it. So, the Jury is still out....
If you think about it, if your beta cells could "Wear out" we'd probably have many more elderly people diagnosed with type 1 after 80+ years of life.
Not saying it isn't possible, but I try to separate fact from theory.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?