I think in my case, I have to answer YES to both your questions. Certainly the control of carb intake has a diret effect on my bgl, and I was running with levels in the 24 to 32+ mmol/l range prior to starting LCHF. I now rarely go over 7 mmol/l. In terms of carb tolerance improving, I run quite a loose ship in terms of diet, so am definitely not strict,I'm curious if anyone knows following a strict low carb diet over a long period can improve insulin sensitivity. Since this seems like a very popular method of controlling blood sugar it made me wonder exactly what's going on with this diet - does your blood sugar improve only because there's less easy-to-convert-to-glucose carbohydrate in your diet and therefore simply less sugar in your blood, or does the diet somehow make the actual diabetes less severe too. Have any long term HFLC-ers found they could tolerate carbohydrates better after a while on the diet?
Actually there is some evidence that a High Carb, Ultra Low fat diet also works. But it must be very, very low fat.As far as Im aware and after reading the anecdotal evidence on here for the last 8 years I would say that the only way to lose insulin resistance is to lose visceral fat, so any diet will work providing that it is sustained long enough to reduce the visceral fat.
I reduced mine but I did not add any extra fat to my diet as every time I did my weight loss just stalled, I ate a low calorie diet to lose weight and a low carb diet to reduce my bg levels so I was eating a less of everything diet but much fewer carbs and no extra fat.
Thats not to say that a lchf diet wont reduce insulin resistance but IMHO it is the weight loss not the diet that reduces insulin resistance, any diet will work ie the Newcastle Study diet which is not a low carb at all, its more like a very very low calorie diet.
I'm curious if anyone knows following a strict low carb diet over a long period can improve insulin sensitivity. Since this seems like a very popular method of controlling blood sugar it made me wonder exactly what's going on with this diet - does your blood sugar improve only because there's less easy-to-convert-to-glucose carbohydrate in your diet and therefore simply less sugar in your blood, or does the diet somehow make the actual diabetes less severe too. Have any long term HFLC-ers found they could tolerate carbohydrates better after a while on the diet?
Following on, this is what DietDoctor says on this subject, and he makes some valid points (IMHO)As I suspected this is more WFPB nonsense being peddled. (Whole Food Plant Based)
Search Results
The McDougall Program Basics. A diet of plant foods, including whole grains and whole-grain products (such as pasta, tortillas, and whole-grain bread), and a wide assortment of vegetables and fruit. Plenty of spices and usually small amounts of sugar and salt to enhance the flavor of food
>>> These are the same proponents that forbid eggs because of their cholesterol. They tend to be more vegan than any others I have heard from. We have had many run ins on this site, and they generally end in a slanging match,
There is some anecdotal evidence that a high carb low fat diet can work for some T2D, but not to the point of the claims for CURE for diabetes as is usually pushed by the acolytes. The HC diet only works with extremely low fat intake, and as such is a proven health hazard since studies have shown that a VLF diet significantly increases the risk of early death. In fact the advocacy for plant based intake is not unlike the diet I am following, but I know from experience that rice is damaging for me, as well as being chocker with arsenic (as reported just now on the News). Leaving out the rat droppings that seem unvoidable. I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone thinks that pushing sugar and salt into a diabetic can do any good at all, let alone lead to a cure. My GP has declared me as Resolved, which I read as well controlled.
So, You take the High Road, and I'll stick with the low road, and I am pretty confident that I know which diet will kill me first.
My motivation here is to help and share this information with people who have been deceived and are making them selves ill with poor advice. Type 2 is caused by fat, and eating animal protein.
Type 2 may be caused in some instances by visceral fat around the organs however eating fat does not make you fat so I'm afraid you are a little mistaken in your beliefs. However each to their own .
I have found that by cutting out carbohydrate from my diet almost entirely I have brought my Type 2 under very tight control whilst loosing weight and increasing my energy levels so much that I have joined a gym. I eat a few veg but mainly red meat with double cream, butter and lactofree milk along with eggs, chicken etc.
I try not to make blanket statements like yours quoted above and attempt to be open minded and speak from my own experience. However when you say we are being "deceived" I'm afraid I have to respond. We all have to follow our own way. Because your way has worked for you does not mean that it would work for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?