S
but I am not a type 1......................sorry, am i being thick?
I think he considers an HbA1c below 5% to be normal, but I could be wrong.
I don't agree, simply because the relationship between HbA1c and average blood glucose levels is not exact.
Also, I think it would be impossible for anyone to keep their blood glucose levels around 4.7 mmol/L at all times.
I've read other opinions that damage occurs when your blood glucose is above 7.8 mmol/L for extended amounts of time, so that's what I focus on.
Here's a few pages on blood glucose levels:
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/16422495.php
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/14045621.php
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/43067769.php
Yes, Dr Bernstein is very much alive and functioning at 83, as you can see on his site: http://www.diabetes-book.com. As the excellent Jenny Ruhl points out, he is about the only writer on diabetes who is both a patient himself and a physician seeing patients (STILL!)Dr B was a type 1 and an early proponent of having LBG to extend his life. He certainly beat the odds - I am not even sure that he isn't still doing so. There is a face book group that follow his works, they are called the rebels I think.
He did not agree with 7.8 but suggested 6.8 was a better 2hour peek number and lived his life that way. He also thought a HBA1C of less than 5 was about right. The rebel group follow his diet recommendations, low carb and a long list of outlawed food. They have really great success similar to here but where he is kind and helpful - the group can be a bit full on IMO.
I think an awful lot of the things we know today in terms of diet were things he bought to the fore if not invented.
Amazing man. I have read bits and bobs of what he has written - amazing.Yes, Dr Bernstein is very much alive and functioning at 85, as you can see on his site: http://www.diabetes-book.com. As the excellent Jenny Ruhl points out, he is about the only writer on diabetes who is both a patient himself and a physician seeing patients (STILL!)
I'd be rapturously happy with 5.3. Some of those young healthy people must have had an amazing breakfast to clock up 9.3. Fried mars bars?Here's a study where they put continuous glucose monitors on 24 young, healthy people:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769652/
Their mean glucose levels were 89.3 ± 6.2 mg/dl (5 ± .3 mmol/L).
Their highest levels were after breakfast (101–168 mg/dl or 5.6 to 9.3 mmol/L).
I have ordered his book and am awaiting it impatiently. Meanwhile there are quite a lot of extracts on his site. I gather, though, that his recipes are dire.Amazing man. I have read bits and bobs of what he has written - amazing.
I'd kill for rice pudding - just not myself!
Good question. 4.7 is a healthy FBG number. If you could manage your spikes so that on average you hit 4.7 I think that would be fantastic. As you know because I have seen many of your posts - it isn't one thing though. So as well as 4.7 fbg and pre-meal - a spike as low as possible and certainly not more than 6.8 (for Dr B) would be there too.Thank you everyone. One more question - so is 4.7 the target HbA1c number?
Thank you everyone. One more question - so is 4.7 the target HbA1c number?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?