• Guest, the forum is undergoing some upgrades and so the usual themes will be unavailable for a few days. In the meantime, you can use the forum like normal. We'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Future Apple Watch could check glucose monitoring

ikacho

Newbie
Apple has hired a small team of biomedical engineers to work at a nondescript office in Palo Alto, California, miles from corporate headquarters.

They are part of a super secret initiative, initially envisioned by the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, to develop sensors that can noninvasively and continuously monitor blood sugar levels to better treat diabetes, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Such a breakthrough would be a "holy grail" for life sciences. Many life sciences companies have tried and failed, as it's highly challenging to track glucose levels accurately without piercing the skin.

The initiative is far enough along that Apple has been conducting feasibility trials at clinical sites across the Bay Area and has hired consultants to help it figure out the regulatory pathways, the people said.


The efforts have been going on for at least five years, the people said. Jobs envisioned wearable devices, like smartwatches, being used to monitor important vitals, such as oxygen levels, heart rate and blood glucose.

The glucose team is said to report to Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies.

One person said about 30 people were working in this group as of a year ago. But speculation has been flying around since the company snapped up about a dozen biomedical experts from other companies. Some of these people joined the secretive team dedicated to glucose, sources said, while others are on Apple Watch team.

One of the people said that Apple is developing optical sensors, which involves shining a light through the skin to measure indications of glucose.

Accurately detecting glucose levels has been such a challenge that one of the top experts in the space described it as "the most difficult technical challenge I have encountered in my career." The space is littered with failures, but that hasn't stopped companies from continuing to attempt to crack this elusive opportunity.

To succeed would cost a company several hundred millions or even a billion dollars.

The breakthrough would be a boon for millions of people with diabetes, spur new medical research and open up a potential market for consumers to track their blood sugar for health and wellness insights. It could turn the Apple Watch into a "must have" rather than a "nice to have" for people who would benefit from an easier way to track their blood sugar.

Apple isn't the only technology company eyeing opportunities in the space. Verily, Google's life sciences team, is currently working on a "smart" contact lens to measure blood sugar via the eye, and it partnered up with DexCom in 2015 to develop a glucose sensing device no bigger than a bandage.

Apple declined to comment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting but rather old news now. Pretty sure I was reading this about 2 weeks ago all over social media. Any reason for the post here? Brand New OP.
 
It would be great to have such a device. Knowing Apple it will not be cheap but will look great. We should ask if they can set it up to report our BG levels on this forum
 
Interesting but rather old news now. Pretty sure I was reading this about 2 weeks ago all over social media. Any reason for the post here? Brand New OP.
Your right, there was speculation that the original Apple watch would have blood glucose monitoring. As an IT guy I particularly watched this, it would have been the only thing to make me turn to Apple technology had they pulled it off.
 
Interesting but rather old news now. Pretty sure I was reading this about 2 weeks ago all over social media. Any reason for the post here? Brand New OP.
We don't all read the same media as you, life would be extremely boring if we did. What is your problem with this post, it is interesting and the first time I've heard of this initiative. Just because you are better informed is not a reason to question why others should not discover the information here.
 
We don't all read the same media as you, life would be extremely boring if we did. What is your problem with this post, it is interesting and the first time I've heard of this initiative. Just because you are better informed is not a reason to question why others should not discover the information here.

To answer your question:
- It came from a user who has never posted here before and only joined today and is littered with external links. It isn't new news and looks like spam to boost outlinks to other web sites, a technique used to boost ranking within Google. Anonymous people, often from China or India are paid peanuts to generate outlinks to other web sites. Hope that helps!

:spitoutdummy:
 
Your right, there was speculation that the original Apple watch would have blood glucose monitoring. As an IT guy I particularly watched this, it would have been the only thing to make me turn to Apple technology had they pulled it off.

I'd be happy to give it a try assuming it was accurate. Happy to support non-pharma businesses over diabetes issues
 
I only remember this because the UK versions were being made in my home town of High Wycombe. It was non invasive, I wonder how Apple's technology differs. Mind you, 2002? that patent may very well have expired by now anyway.

"Sales of the first glucose meter that tests through the skin and automatically provides continuous readings finally began in the United States in 2002. The manufacturer, Cygnus Inc. of Redwood City, California, had been seeking FDA approval since June 1999."

It was an open letter to Steve Jobs in 2007 (from Amy Tenderich) that sparked the Apple initiative and I think the only reason to mention how old the news is, is to make sure we don't all get our hopes up that this going to change our lives any time soon. I've read that Apple are filing patents so they're making progress, getting FDA approval might be one of their biggest stumbling blocks.
 
To answer your question:
- It came from a user who has never posted here before and only joined today and is littered with external links. It isn't new news and looks like spam to boost outlinks to other web sites, a technique used to boost ranking within Google. Anonymous people, often from China or India are paid peanuts to generate outlinks to other web sites. Hope that helps!

:spitoutdummy:

The links have now been removed.
 
Back
Top