Q. How many trade deals will we have on 1st April 2019?
A. 0
Good god!!! the only circumstances under which one country can refuse to supply medicines to another, is when international sanctions are in place.
There would probably have to be a UN resolution before EU countries could stop supplying the UK with insulin.
What I want to know is how many medications have a very short shelf life?
We should prepare for disruption to supply chains, especially just in time. It's only prudent
Ofgs, you aren't going to start refighting the referendum here are you.
We are moving into a transition period, in case you've forgotten. Leaving with no deal would mean we use WTO trading rules, which work just fine, but include some tariffs. In fact we trade with a lot of the rest of the world under WTO rules.
A Canada +++ deal is a sensible option, problem is May have gone rogue, with a barmy plan about chequers, that the EU are in the process of rejecting.
Leave won the referendum. Where do you think we would end as a democracy, if we didn't implement the results of elections.
The only reason leaving on WTO terms would be a problem would be if we weren't properly prepared. Theresa May has to take responsibility for any lack of preparedness.
Also her dead in the water chequers plan, funnily enough, makes no deal more likely, not less likely.
There, now you know.
No I'm not. What I said was fact. What you said was just supposition. It takes years to negotiate trade deals. Why did we spend two years negioting within the Govt to put forward a policy which we know will be rejected. It's just lunacy. The referendum is now officially a crime scene.
But one of 160 countries in the WTO, any one of which can block us. NZ raising concerns about meat production already.That's right @Guzzler there
Trade deals are a method of bypassing the rather attractive most favoured nation aspect of WTO rules. Which, in my view, means that poorer countries lose out, because they don't have the same negotiating power.
But FTAs do not give "permission to trade" they just have an effect on patterns of trade.
It'll be very exciting when the UK regains it's seat at the WTO, as a full member. There are much bigger and more interesting things going on, than obsessing about frictionless trade, whether it is or not is another issue, with the EU.
We actually need to make sensible plans for different possible outcomes, since we can't know what they are.We are all apparently going to get super gonorrhoea too!! Of course that would be more of an issue, because there would be no regular supply chain for the medicine, and the increase in demand might take a while to be sorted out.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/...ergonorrhoea-health-chief-warns-a3898186.html
It's quite disturbing that so many people in politics, and running quangos are so prone to hysteria, I wonder if it's the public schools, or something going wrong at Oxbridge. We clearly need wider recruitment policies.
It's not a question of withholding supplies. It's about guaranteeing supplies chains.Exactly, I suppose insulin would be pretty unique in that stockpiling can only go so far. I am clinging to the thought that no European country (who are still our allies, after all) would refuse to trade vital medicines with us. Who would benefit from such actions? This whole process has been a mess since day one.
It's not about that. It's about logistics, and would supplies be disrupted. We need to take sensible precautions to make sure they are not.Good god!!! the only circumstances under which one country can refuse to supply medicines to another, is when international sanctions are in place.
There would probably have to be a UN resolution before EU countries could stop supplying the UK with insulin.
Not sure I was obsessing with frictionless trade, but it's that just cheaper and easier?Trade deals are a method of bypassing the rather attractive most favoured nation aspect of WTO rules. Which, in my view, means that poorer countries lose out, because they don't have the same negotiating power.
But FTAs do not give "permission to trade" they just have an effect on patterns of trade.
It'll be very exciting when the UK regains it's seat at the WTO, as a full member. There are much bigger and more interesting things going on, than obsessing about frictionless trade, whether it is or not is another issue, with the EU.
It's not a question of withholding supplies. It's about guaranteeing supplies chains.
At what price?Pretty sure that Big Pharma wants to sell us their wares. And that they are powerful enough to get around any supply and demand problems.
But one of 160 countries in the WTO, any one of which can block us. NZ raising concerns about meat production already.
This is a valid point. We do need to be sure that contingencies are in place but (and it is a big but) this relies on strong negotiators who I fear are thin on the ground atm.At what price?
True.This is a valid point. We do need to be sure that contingencies are in place but (and it is a big but) this relies on strong negotiators who I fear are thin on the ground atm.
The endo, Partha Kar, who has been quite active on the libre campaigning front, tweeted about this yesterday, saying he'll have a look into it. He clearly knows his way about the politics of diabetes/NHS, so maybe worthwhile keeping an eye on future tweets from him.
https://mobile.twitter.com/parthaskar/status/1023148229486170112
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?