New forum user here from Canada. I came upon this forum while surfing for Freestyle Libre problems and issues. It's interesting and a little disturbing to see that others have had problems similar to my experience and that it's not just me.
I am Type 1 for 47 years, so I've been doing this for a long time - even before BG meters. I still have all my hands, feet, vision and hair, and my A1C is usually below 6. I know what I'm doing, and I've been doing it without the Libre for most of 47 years.
I have been using the Freestyle (not the Freestyle 2) since February, 2021, and it's been a mixed experience at best. I love the convenience and data density, when it works. I've only had one sensor fall off (out of 18 used so far), but wild inaccuracy and outright failure are recurring problems, as described by others on this forum. So far, Abbott has replaced 5 sensors, and they'll replace a 6th tomorrow (today for you in the UK) because I just yanked a new sensor off after my first attempted scan an hour and a half after starting it because the reader announced the sensor wasn't working. At all.
My routine is to place it on the back of my upper arm as directed, start it, and then start scanning a couple of hours later. For the first 24 hours, I will often do a finger prick and then a scan 10-15 minutes later to see if there are systematic errors for which I can compensate, or if there are varying errors in excess of 20%. When I get a good sensor, my personal latency seems to be about 12 minutes.
I log the data in a spreadsheet with times and readings so that I can accurately report to Abbott what's going on if I have to call them. I have offered to send a PDF of my spreadsheet to Abbott, but they have not been interested so far. I sent them one anyway, and just got a canned response from customer service that indicated they hadn't looked at the spreadsheet or read the accompanying e-mail.
Like I said, it's great when it works. That said, a failure rate of 33% for a device used to measure such a critical life parameter, even if it's supposed to be backed up by another measuring technology, seems excessive. I'm beginning to think that if I have to use so many finger pricks to check the Libre, then I might as well not bother with the Libre.
"You want to complain?!? Why, look at these shoes! I've only 'ad them three weeks, and they're already half worn through! You can complain if you want to, but nothing happens. You might's well not bother!" - Monty Python
I am Type 1 for 47 years, so I've been doing this for a long time - even before BG meters. I still have all my hands, feet, vision and hair, and my A1C is usually below 6. I know what I'm doing, and I've been doing it without the Libre for most of 47 years.
I have been using the Freestyle (not the Freestyle 2) since February, 2021, and it's been a mixed experience at best. I love the convenience and data density, when it works. I've only had one sensor fall off (out of 18 used so far), but wild inaccuracy and outright failure are recurring problems, as described by others on this forum. So far, Abbott has replaced 5 sensors, and they'll replace a 6th tomorrow (today for you in the UK) because I just yanked a new sensor off after my first attempted scan an hour and a half after starting it because the reader announced the sensor wasn't working. At all.
My routine is to place it on the back of my upper arm as directed, start it, and then start scanning a couple of hours later. For the first 24 hours, I will often do a finger prick and then a scan 10-15 minutes later to see if there are systematic errors for which I can compensate, or if there are varying errors in excess of 20%. When I get a good sensor, my personal latency seems to be about 12 minutes.
I log the data in a spreadsheet with times and readings so that I can accurately report to Abbott what's going on if I have to call them. I have offered to send a PDF of my spreadsheet to Abbott, but they have not been interested so far. I sent them one anyway, and just got a canned response from customer service that indicated they hadn't looked at the spreadsheet or read the accompanying e-mail.
Like I said, it's great when it works. That said, a failure rate of 33% for a device used to measure such a critical life parameter, even if it's supposed to be backed up by another measuring technology, seems excessive. I'm beginning to think that if I have to use so many finger pricks to check the Libre, then I might as well not bother with the Libre.
"You want to complain?!? Why, look at these shoes! I've only 'ad them three weeks, and they're already half worn through! You can complain if you want to, but nothing happens. You might's well not bother!" - Monty Python