Type in LADA and get readingIt's rare compared to T1 or T2 numbers.
Hello everyone. I've had a rollercoaster of a week.
Told on Wednesday that I've put myself in non-diabetic range (HBA1C of 5.8) 3 months after first diagnosis of Type 2 (initial HBA1C of 6.8%).
Found out today from privately conducted antibody tests that I have type 1.5 or LADA
I don't know what any of this means yet:
Insulin 2.7 mIU/l
Gad 65 Antibodies 706.6
Ia-2 Antibodies Negative
Znt8 Antibodies 188.8
Am 50. Had worked my a$$ of running every day and eating better to beat Type 2 so pretty shocked. Also was never overweight. Initially 5'11'' and 12.6 stone. Now 10.9 stone so really quite thin and not sure I have stopped losing weight.
Not sure why I am giving you all this information. I would just like some wisdom.
Thank you.
Thank you Ellie. Yes I have appointments lined up X@Damodamo welcome to the forums, and congrats on getting the tests done privately so that you know you are LADA now rather than waiting until you get really sick for lack on insulin.
Its rare compared with T2 numbers (90% of the diabetic population) but many many T1s get diagnosed via LADA as adults. I believe roughly 10% of adult T2s are in fact LADA and get rediagnosed such after their diabetes progresses fast despite the T2 medication and/or diet.
Treatment for LADA folk seems a bit variable. Some doctors will start you out on low doses of insulin to give your pancreas a rest and hopefully prolong the period that you still produce some of your own insulin, others wait until your body can no longer cope without insulin. In any case you'll find your insulin needs gradually increase. Some people find that they can have a honeymoon period for years where they still produce insulin, but it's as well to have access to it even if you don't need it yet, as when your production does finally end the need for insulin can be sudden, and no one wants a trip to hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis.
The bad news is that you will eventually need insulin. The good news is that you probably aren't insulin resistant/T2 and therefore you'll have more dietary freedom than a T2 once you learn how to balance the carbs in your diet with insulin.
Have you got an appointment with your doctor to talk about your treatment going forward?
Good luck.
Hi there. I was 52 when I had one of those well women checks and they told me I was 'pre diabetic'. They went through a checklist of 'type 2' stereotypical 'lifestyle changes', and appeared perplexed when NONE of them really applied, I was slim, ran most days, ate a reasonable diet (I know now that it was around 150 carbs a day), etc. They then said 'oh well, don't eat processed food' as I had mentioned at work (rarely) I ate a microwave meal!
Never heard anything for 3 years (and to my shame, I never really gave any thought to what pre diabetes really meant anyway so never followed it up myself).
Then I started getting strong symptoms of diabetes and to cut a long story short, off to the GP and straight into hospital where my levels were off the charts and I was on the very verge of DKA.
Still slim and very active etc, so because my appearance (other than age) did not fit their type 2 profile, they actually carried out a C Peptide test & and antibody test BUT only after different Consultants and Diabetes Nurses at the hospital almost came to blows over what type I was! A GP would not have stood a chance and would have still gone for type 2! . The tests came back as type 1 (or you could call it LADA, they won't use that term generally speaking).
If not for being slim I have NO doubt I would have been classed as type 2 and spent even more weeks and months becoming ill. I was placed on insulin and am still, 3 more years later on low amounts as I think I am still producing some of my own.
It is GOOD that you have been proactive and have had private tests done (what made you think of doing that?), because now you have avoided a misdiagnosis which would have had detrimental (if not worse) consequences.
As for wisdom, well don't think about all that running and eating better as a waste (I'm sure that was tongue in cheek) because ANY person with ANY form of diabetes is likely to benefit from that approach. x
If I haven't said thank you already, thank you! A bit difficult to keep track. You help is hugely appreciated.In 2010 I was diagnosed t2
2019/2020 rediagnosed t1
Lada is ultimately t1 but it typically comes on slowly in the end it mean you stop producing insulin and hence are considered t1
Now is was put on insulin in 2010.. And they think the reason I produced my own insulin for so long is because it was being help with the added.. It was easier when I was producing some..
What you really need to do is go back to you consultant and discuss the gad test and get a proper 'official' diagnosis to make sure you get the right treatment when needed
The work you have don't is not lost either way.. The healthier you are the easier it will be to keep things under control and stay healthier longer
Good luck
Hi I like you was diagnosed aged 52 as LADA and although I was doing everything i could to keep the situation under control, within the year I was on slow release insulin, and two years later i had fast release insulin added to the mix. I kept thinking it was something I had done as no family history not over weight and eat well.Hello everyone. I've had a rollercoaster of a week.
Told on Wednesday that I've put myself in non-diabetic range (HBA1C of 5.8) 3 months after first diagnosis of Type 2 (initial HBA1C of 6.8%).
Found out today from privately conducted antibody tests that I have type 1.5 or LADA
I don't know what any of this means yet:
Insulin 2.7 mIU/l
Gad 65 Antibodies 706.6
Ia-2 Antibodies Negative
Znt8 Antibodies 188.8
Am 50. Had worked my *** of running every day and eating better to beat Type 2 so pretty shocked. Also was never overweight. Initially 5'11'' and 12.6 stone. Now 10.9 stone so really quite thin and not sure I have stopped losing weight.
Not sure why I am giving you all this information. I would just like some wisdom.
Thank you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?