• Guest, the forum is undergoing some upgrades and so the usual themes will be unavailable for a few days. In the meantime, you can use the forum like normal. We'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Libre 2 not registering hypos

M

MarthaD

Well-Known Member
I'm not yet formally diagnosed with RH, but currently having tests for my hypos. Meanwhile, I've a question about the libre 2 and how it records hypos. I had very bad hypo symptoms the other day that took me a while to come out of. While I was experiencing the symptoms, my libre 2 wavered between 3.9 and 3.8. This continue for about 20 minutes. I couldn't do a finger prick at the time, but I think if I had it would have confirmed the hypo and I might even have read lower than 3.8 (I find the libre sometimes will say 4.1 when a finger prick reads at 3.6, for example). The problem I have is that I'm wearing a libre 2 so I can demonstrate to the endo that I'm having hypos, but it rarely registers them on the app as a low glucose event. In this particular case it shows a very rapid decline from 11mmol to about 4mmol, but the hypo itself didn't register, despite reading under 3.9 for ages. This has happened to me loads of time and so it's very difficult to "prove" my hypos through the libre, even when I'm very symptomatic and finger prick confirms. Has anyone else experienced this?
 
There are a number of limitations of all CGMs but doctors, DSNs and manufacturers either don't know or don't publicise them.
Therefore, it is down to users to spread the word which you will find repeated again and again on forums such as this one.

Off the top of my head the common limitations are
- insertion trauma. Inserting a foreign object into your body can affect the readings near the Libre filament. Our body can take up to 48 hours to get used to this foreign object resulting in apparently random numbers for the first day or two. These affects vary from person to person but those of us experiencing it often insert our sensor a day or two before activating.
- compression lows. If pressure is applied to a sensor, the flow of interstitial fluid (what is used to measure BG) is restricted. Therefore, the sensor may report a false low. This is most common when sleeping and we turn over onto the arm with the sensor. You can spot these on the graphs as they are typically very short dips and returns to the previous reading, likely to be when you turn over again.
- reading delays. CGMs do not get their readings from blood, they use interstitial fluid. However, changes in BG are reflected in interstitial fluid readings about 15 minutes later. CGMs such as Libre use an algorithm to convert from interstitial fluid readings to BG. This algorithm takes the delay into consideration by extrapolating the current trend and effectively "predicting the current reading. This approach works most of the time but can exhibit some weird behaviours when our BG trend changes direction. For example, it can predict higher (or lower) than our BG actually goes so you may see a high (or low) reading which is later overwritten when the interstitial fluid "catches up". But the most common unwanted behaviour is a delay in showing a recovery from hypo.
- limited calibration - the relationship between BG and interstitial fluid is not linear. Therefore CGM manufacturers have chosen to use a conversion algorithm that is correct at "normal" BG. As a result, high readings (typically above 10 mmol/l) and low (typically below 4 mmol/l) can be inaccurate.
- meter accuracy. In the UK, all glucose meters (both finger prick and CGMs) are required to be with 15% of "true" BG value 95% of the time. If we have a finger prick meter which is, say 10% under reading and a CGM that is 10% over reading, the difference between the two can be significant. I believe this is why people often report that "Libre is always high". It is likely to be that it is higher than their finger prick meter which they have relied on for some time.
 
I understand all of this, thank you. My question was more about why I can read as 3.9/3.8mmol for over 20 mins, but it doesn't get captured as a low glucose event in the data or on the graph of the app.
 
MarthaD said:
I understand all of this, thank you. My question was more about why I can read as 3.9/3.8mmol for over 20 mins, but it doesn't get captured as a low glucose event in the data or on the graph of the app.
Click to expand...
I've just had a look at my graphs I've had 3x hypos the last week all when I'm sleeping and all have registered. The shortest one was an hour, the longest 2 hours. I've had other mini hypos during the day, less than half an hour, maybe 15 mins toll I've fixed it, and they don't show up on the log. Wonder if it's something to do with the length of time, or perhaps needing the blood sugar to drop below what yours was? My recorded lows were all around 3.
 
MarthaD said:
I understand all of this, thank you. My question was more about why I can read as 3.9/3.8mmol for over 20 mins, but it doesn't get captured as a low glucose event in the data or on the graph of the app.
Click to expand...
There are a few things. Have a look at your settings and see what you have set as a target range. If the low end is 3.9, it will still count as normal level, and only when it goes below this, it will start tracking this as a low glucose event. You can change this to 4 if you want 3.9 counted as below mormal range. Also, the reading needs to be below your target range for a period of time before it gets recorded as low glucose event - I'm sure I've seen some rules explained around this, but don't seem to find this reference anywhere. Finally, I haven't yet fully investigated the downloadable data set, but it seems that there is very detailed by minute data for very recent periods, but then it gets averaged and compressed into 15 min intevals and this averaging can potentially make hypos 'disappear' if they were borderline to begin with and lasted under 30 min.
 
Another thought that just occurred. I self fund Libre 2 and also BG test strips. I use Libre 2 reader to do my BG and ketone fingerprick tests. The reader connects to PC and syncs records to LibreView, which also has my CGM readings. When creating my BG analysis reports, I seem to remember to be able to specify which devices I want to include data from, and the report combines it all to show both CGM and fingerprick tests.

Maybe that's just a fancy way of saying that your doctor should be considering CGM evidence as well as whatever you can support via a blood glucose meter. Just make sure you set up date/time correctly so that the test results match. Borderline normal result from CGM confirmed with fingerprick as hypo should be good evidence.

The attached pic was me testing the difference between CGM and a fingerprick. As you can see, for me, CGM also runs higher and highlights the importance of setting the correct time. IMG-20240422-WA0020.jpg
 
Ideally, you'd manage to do a fingerprock test when hypo so that you can demonstrate how much the libre is over reading. Failing that, you could try getting a software add on that allows you to calibrate it (xdrip???) Tagging @Antje77 who I believe uses this.

You could also consider using a cgm that permits calibration (eg dexcom g6 and g7 and dexcom ONE+ but unfortunately not dexcom ONE.

Good luck
 
TheSecretCarbAddict said:
Another thought that just occurred. I self fund Libre 2 and also BG test strips. I use Libre 2 reader to do my BG and ketone fingerprick tests. The reader connects to PC and syncs records to LibreView, which also has my CGM readings. When creating my BG analysis reports, I seem to remember to be able to specify which devices I want to include data from, and the report combines it all to show both CGM and fingerprick tests.

Maybe that's just a fancy way of saying that your doctor should be considering CGM evidence as well as whatever you can support via a blood glucose meter. Just make sure you set up date/time correctly so that the test results match. Borderline normal result from CGM confirmed with fingerprick as hypo should be good evidence.

The attached pic was me testing the difference between CGM and a fingerprick. As you can see, for me, CGM also runs higher and highlights the importance of setting the correct time. View attachment 67355
Click to expand...
Oh, thank you, that's super helpful! I'm going to try this.
 
EllieM said:
Ideally, you'd manage to do a fingerprock test when hypo so that you can demonstrate how much the libre is over reading. Failing that, you could try getting a software add on that allows you to calibrate it (xdrip???) Tagging @Antje77 who I believe uses this.
Click to expand...
I use the alternative app DiaBox (not available in the app store) to calibrate.
More information about DiaBox here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/974278412920319
 
In Response said:
There are a number of limitations of all CGMs but doctors, DSNs and manufacturers either don't know or don't publicise them.
Therefore, it is down to users to spread the word which you will find repeated again and again on forums such as this one.

Off the top of my head the common limitations are
- insertion trauma. Inserting a foreign object into your body can affect the readings near the Libre filament. Our body can take up to 48 hours to get used to this foreign object resulting in apparently random numbers for the first day or two. These affects vary from person to person but those of us experiencing it often insert our sensor a day or two before activating.
- compression lows. If pressure is applied to a sensor, the flow of interstitial fluid (what is used to measure BG) is restricted. Therefore, the sensor may report a false low. This is most common when sleeping and we turn over onto the arm with the sensor. You can spot these on the graphs as they are typically very short dips and returns to the previous reading, likely to be when you turn over again.
- reading delays. CGMs do not get their readings from blood, they use interstitial fluid. However, changes in BG are reflected in interstitial fluid readings about 15 minutes later. CGMs such as Libre use an algorithm to convert from interstitial fluid readings to BG. This algorithm takes the delay into consideration by extrapolating the current trend and effectively "predicting the current reading. This approach works most of the time but can exhibit some weird behaviours when our BG trend changes direction. For example, it can predict higher (or lower) than our BG actually goes so you may see a high (or low) reading which is later overwritten when the interstitial fluid "catches up". But the most common unwanted behaviour is a delay in showing a recovery from hypo.
- limited calibration - the relationship between BG and interstitial fluid is not linear. Therefore CGM manufacturers have chosen to use a conversion algorithm that is correct at "normal" BG. As a result, high readings (typically above 10 mmol/l) and low (typically below 4 mmol/l) can be inaccurate.
- meter accuracy. In the UK, all glucose meters (both finger prick and CGMs) are required to be with 15% of "true" BG value 95% of the time. If we have a finger prick meter which is, say 10% under reading and a CGM that is 10% over reading, the difference between the two can be significant. I believe this is why people often report that "Libre is always high". It is likely to be that it is higher than their finger prick meter which they have relied on for some time.
Click to expand...
Thank you. This is really very helpful
 
ATB123 said:
I've just had a look at my graphs I've had 3x hypos the last week all when I'm sleeping and all have registered. The shortest one was an hour, the longest 2 hours. I've had other mini hypos during the day, less than half an hour, maybe 15 mins toll I've fixed it, and they don't show up on the log. Wonder if it's something to do with the length of time, or perhaps needing the blood sugar to drop below what yours was? My recorded lows were all around 3.
Click to expand...
Hi Martha.
I don't have diabetes and my HbA1C is perfect but I have hypopituitarism after birth (Sheehan's syndrome). I've been using a CGM to show my endo that I have wildly fluctuating sugars, but I have the same issue... alarm goes off, hypo is clear on the screen but later the graph gets overwritten with averages and I can't show anything for it :(. I've learnt to enter a note at that time and add my symptoms (I have no symptoms when I have a hypo at all, and it's worse at 3am to 6am and 9am to noon) - by adding a note it captures the reading and trend j. The logbook and that can be used to show your endo or GP. Best of luck!!!
 
Inge M said:
Hi Martha.
I don't have diabetes and my HbA1C is perfect but I have hypopituitarism after birth (Sheehan's syndrome). I've been using a CGM to show my endo that I have wildly fluctuating sugars, but I have the same issue... alarm goes off, hypo is clear on the screen but later the graph gets overwritten with averages and I can't show anything for it :(. I've learnt to enter a note at that time and add my symptoms (I have no symptoms when I have a hypo at all, and it's worse at 3am to 6am and 9am to noon) - by adding a note it captures the reading and trend j. The logbook and that can be used to show your endo or GP. Best of luck!!!
Click to expand...
If you have a glucometer, when you experience an alarm on your CGM take a finger prick reading to see if it is in hypo levels.
CGM s are known for compression lows during sleep.

That is the first time I have heard of your condition. What causes the fluctuating blood glucose levels?
What is the treatment?
How do you treat the lows?

I have Late non diabetic reactive hypoglycaemia. Which is caused by food intolerance.

Best wishes.
 
MarthaD said:
I understand all of this, thank you. My question was more about why I can read as 3.9/3.8mmol for over 20 mins, but it doesn't get captured as a low glucose event in the data or on the graph of the app.
Click to expand...
Mine is the same I use high intensity cardio at the Gym to be insulin sensitive fortunately I get the push notifications but nothings recorded on the app I used a screenshot as I can't even scan and log events.
But my nurse said she can see all the events and some I'd missed.
Honestly I couldn't go to the gym without the libre
 
MarthaD said:
Oh, thank you, that's super helpful! I'm going to try this.
Click to expand...
What Libre 2 are you using, the original has been replaced by Libre 2 Plus which is more accurate. Libre 2 will be discontinued soon. I changed my prescription with GP to the new one and all hypo’s are being recorded?
 
Libre takes readings every minute. These are used to produce the Spot readings that provide the instant readings you see and the alarms. As can be seen in the chart below, these vary quite considerably. For the chart and all averages, they are first Smoothed. The smoothed line is the chart you see in LibreView. It is also shown in the chart below. The Spot readings (spots below) are not always on the smoothed line! This is particularly the case with new sensors which have more variability. Libre 2 and 2+ and 3 have better smoothing but the variability is still there. So the graph is the more accurate than the spot readings. The graph is taken from 15 readings rather than just 1. If you have a suspicious spot readings, always take another a few minutes later, particularly in first 2 days of sensor when insertion trauma creates macrophage cells which coat the filament and cause variability.

This chart is FSL1 which accentuates the issue. The light blue line is the continuous spot readings of a new sensor. The Green line is the spot readings from a 14 day old sensor. The black lines are the Libreview chart displayed averages.
At 06:30 you can see a spot line in the alarm location but the average line is 5.5.

IMG_5730.jpeg
 
Last edited:
MarthaD said:
I'm not yet formally diagnosed with RH, but currently having tests for my hypos. Meanwhile, I've a question about the libre 2 and how it records hypos. I had very bad hypo symptoms the other day that took me a while to come out of. While I was experiencing the symptoms, my libre 2 wavered between 3.9 and 3.8. This continue for about 20 minutes. I couldn't do a finger prick at the time, but I think if I had it would have confirmed the hypo and I might even have read lower than 3.8 (I find the libre sometimes will say 4.1 when a finger prick reads at 3.6, for example). The problem I have is that I'm wearing a libre 2 so I can demonstrate to the endo that I'm having hypos, but it rarely registers them on the app as a low glucose event. In this particular case it shows a very rapid decline from 11mmol to about 4mmol, but the hypo itself didn't register, despite reading under 3.9 for ages. This has happened to me loads of time and so it's very difficult to "prove" my hypos through the libre, even when I'm very symptomatic and finger prick confirms. Has anyone else experienced this?
Click to expand...
As a Type 1 Diabetic, my hospital transferred me from Libre 2 onto Dexcom. I was getting quite a few lower blood sugars (a busy Mum with 3 businesses that I also juggle). But with Dexcom for the past 2 years, I have found everything a lot easier to manage because 20mins before my blood sugar drops too low, it is shouting at me via my phone to pay attention and sort out my blood sugar. So it has made managing my Type 1 Diabetes a lot easier. No I don't like the pinging of my phone, but that is far better than ending up with a serious issue!.
 
Back
Top