• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Low Carb Diets Dangerous

In that case, there should be! You are saving the NHS loads of money and freeing yourself from dependency on the drug industry. What sort of prize would members like?
Sally

A Porsche, please. With go-faster stripes and an Italian chauffeur who will work for nowt.
 

Congratulations, excellent news. You’ve done really well and deserve a prize. Although reversal of complications must be reward enough. I also followed the guidelines and just took the meds, which increased at every review. Thankfully discovered low carb and this site before getting complications.
 
Last edited:
As the study was not relevant to us... not done with diabetics.. we will have to wait until a study is done on long term diabetic low carbers and see what that says
 
[QUOTE="Tannith, post: 1861910, member:
There is no need to risk knocking four years off your lifespan by going low carb.

I have heard that type 2 diabetes knocks 10 years of your life expectancy. By going low carb and reversing this, even taking off 4years you will still gain 6!
 
As the study was not relevant to us... not done with diabetics.. we will have to wait until a study is done on long term diabetic low carbers and see what that says

Virta Health recently published their first year findings. DCUK are currently monitoring the Low Carb Programme. If Prof. Taylor can say 4-5 years is long term then we will not have to wait that long at all.

When all said and done the great 'experiment' that is/was Low fat High carb has had 40+ years and we see the results all around us.
 
The low carb programme gathers info. Info that should be evidence enough as to how it benefits its users.
A far cheaper way than researched data from a set of patients.

ND isn't designed to be low carb but personally if it was their research would have spoke volumes, if not high fat too.

Low to medium fat is only way I lose weight on low carb. I'm on insulin thou.
Injected insulin doesn't work well on high fat.
 
Out of interest (as a type 1) why doesn't high fat work with injected insulin in your experience?
 
Out of interest (as a type 1) why doesn't high fat work with injected insulin in your experience?
It slows my digestion down, so if, with any carb that carb effect/spike comes later than what novarapid can cover. So often a hypo from insulin units; then its treated. Treatment and the meal carbs compound things. Resulting into a much higher bg later on.

Similiar with fatty protein but much less spike so I use this effect to my advantage to block a liver dump. Eating a tiny fatty protein before bed.
 
Oh I understnd now. I am guessing you need high ish doses if you are insulin resistant. It is interesting to me as a type 1 using a pump (steady trickle of background going in with the ability to bolus for an extended period to cover a fatty meal with carb e.g. pizza. Anyway its very hard to get on an even keel without your own pancreas doing working as it should!
 
The study states that the mean total energy intake of the participants was around 1,600 kcal. This seems very low. Makes me suspicious of the accuracy of the food diaries.
Minnesota starvation experiment was based on 1540 cals I think?
 
You do realise that the Harvard centre responsible for the study and Walter Willett in particular are vegan advocates don't you?
Do you really think they will give an unbiased opinion from what is at the heart of it a completely flawed study in the first place.
 
The conclusion of the study is unambiguous
I think you mean biased.. and the whole study worthless so a bit pointless extrapolating any advice from it.
It has after all been thoroughly debunked and was written by people with an agenda of promoting a Whole Food Plant Based way of eating supported by some very dodgy science.
 
There is no risk of "knocking" 4 years off your life.. are you able to read anything with a critical eye or are you happy to accept everything that is written.. if so how can you align the findings of the PURE study with the findings of this one? They are almost diametrically opposed (although both are flawed)
 
I missed your warnings. I have not been on here that long. Please repeat them for my benefit, together with liks to any related articles. Thank you for your help. Tannith
 
There are no prizes for avoiding medication. The majority of T2s control their diabetes and prevent complications by just popping a pill and eating as before.

Perhaps we can rephrase that...

The majority of T2s and healthcare provider thinks that they can prevent complications by just popping pills and eating as before, without actually ever achieving or maintaining normal glucose levels.

They then accept any resulting complications as inevitable and simply a natural progression of a chronic and progressive condition...

No...there is no benefit whatsoever in striving to maintain a medication free, normal glucose lifestyle at all especially when animal fats or protein is involved. That will condemn us to a shorten life. Please continue to eat your carbs and take your medication.
 
Last edited:
The crux of the study is really aimed at discrediting the runaway success of low carbs diets that has animal proteins/fats...key vegans advocates no longer denies that fats from whatever sources flatlines glucose.

What surprises me is that the underlying data in this study has a 19 year data gap and assumption. Hardly compelling I would think. I would expect similar data to in support of low carbs high fats diet to be met with derision...

Vegetarian Diet and Cardiometabolic Risk among Asian Indians in the United States
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/2018/1675369/

It has always puzzled me that
"Contrary to the Western perspective of vegetarianism as an adopted lifestyle by choice in adulthood, vegetarianism in India is a way of life from birth for a third of its population. Derived from religious scriptures and beliefs of Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism, the practice of vegetarianism goes beyond the principle of ahimsa or nonviolence and is considered a conscious and ethical way of living and eating [25]."

Yet

"Despite the many touted health-promoting features of the predominantly vegetarian Asian Indian diet, studies report on the increasing rates of NCDs (noncommunicable diseases) such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome marked by the raised concentrations of inflammatory markers and cytokines [13, 30]."

Hence I never worry unnecessarily about bias arguments against animal proteins/fats. Except that it denies the general public from access to an effective tool.

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…