Its low fat, high carb according to their sales literature
Low-fat, plant-based, whole-food nutrition
Learn the science behind eating nutrient-dense, carbohydrate-rich food to reverse insulin resistance.
Surely their scientists know that insulin resistance is rare in T1 D but they imply this diet will solve problems for all diabetics. Er?
A 2% drop in HbA1c is hardly mind blowing. It's a 1.6 mmol/mol drop. And 20 lb weight loss is less than the 15 kg of Newcastle. It's 1.4 stones so significant, but Roy Taylor needs the full 15 kg to claim remission.
is this 2% actually meaning two dcct points eg from 9% to 7%.A 2% drop in HbA1c is hardly mind blowing. It's a 1.6 mmol/mol drop..
I really can't understand why it is being suggested as good for type 2 diabetics. Any ideas please?
It is still very high in carbs, and non insulin users can't compensate for that.Well, if you are making your own food from scratch rather than buying premade meals from a supermarket, you miss out on a whole load of added sugar?
Yup. USA HbA1c is DCCT, we in UK are mmol/mol. They claim full science backing it up, but I suspect that since they reference McDougall, then it may be what he used in his book. ADVENT -2 and Harvard Nurses Study. Or it could be Forks over Knives that also used McDougal. Michael Greger also referenced bases his plans on the same source.is this 2% actually meaning two dcct points eg from 9% to 7%.
I’m trying to locate any evidence for their claims. Anyone found any in their media?
https://www.masteringdiabetes.org/
That doesn’t seem exclusive to the regime being discussed. In fact it’s a bonus point for keto too which in direct opposition to the mastering diabetes approach.Well, if you are making your own food from scratch rather than buying premade meals from a supermarket, you miss out on a whole load of added sugar?
A 2% drop in HbA1c is hardly mind blowing. It's a 1.6 mmol/mol drop.
I understand the premise of their regime is that the cause of t2 diabetes and insulin resistance is fat and that it gets taken up by the cells and blocks glucose receptors in those cells and to eat the “goods” carbs.
What experience does anyone have, what are the “good or bad” points? Where is the argument strong and well evidenced? Where does it fall down?
For clarity I haven’t yet read or much about it, I’m just exploring the concept. Much as I did low carb before ploughing deeper into the science etc.
But, you can achieve great A1Cs with a low carb diet or a high-carb diet, that comes down to food planning and insulin management. It's up to you on where you stand on that topic.
Thanks for your interesting and informative post which I mostly agree with. It sounds like this diet can work well for T1s if they want it to. Like the others, I am sceptical as its benefits for T2s, though. (As you are young and on insulin I am assuming you are T1? I know, I shouldn't assume).
I would be very interested to know whether this diet can be made to work for T2s. (My son is vegan and 3 out of his 4 grandparents are T2.)
What's the basis for this particular argument? Do they have data/studies that show this will happen?I think the authors argument are that if you eat lots of carbs (healthy ones) you train you're body to be sensitive to them and so as a T1D you'd need less insulin per meal and as a T2D you'd tackle insulin resistance.
I think that the argument for the high carb diets is that they have to be ultra low fat, and this is what provides the protections, certainly it was the argument used to justify the WFPB diets. However, large sacle studies and some meta analyses have established that the association between all cause mortality and dietary fat intake is that the ultra low fat diet has a higher risk of adverse outcome than even the high fat intake diets.@Doug88
thanks for the considered reply. I can see that eating whole foods of both animal and non animal varieties is a healthier way of eating than a junk food diet and will probably give benefits either way over a highly processed diet. As someone who already struggles to absorb some nutrients and is close to anaemic I can’t see this approach working for me on that basis alone. Nor as a type 2 is there the option of managing levels with insulin. That is a one way street to deterioration and complications from increasing insulin resistance for us. All the history shows that medication alone, even with reasonable bgl achieved, does not avoid this hence the reason type 2 is known as progressive under a medicated model of the last 50 yrs.
It is this claim for improving IR in type 2 in the presence of higher carbs - of whatever source, as the carbohydrate itself is all the same even if the packaging/skin it comes in is more healthful - that totally baffles me entirely.
Actually low dietary fat does not equate to low blood cholesterol. Our liver manufactuers ALL the cholesterol we use in the blood and does this by stripping out bits from incoming cholesterol or by creating cholesterol from scratch. The human cholesterol has its own electrochemical signalling system that the incoming cholesterol does not, and so the incoming cholesterol is incompatible with what we need. There is no direct relationship between what you eat and what we circulate.The idea of this diet for T1s & T2s is to reduce insulin resistance and is supposedly good for reducing complication risks. Low fat equals low colesteral so that helps weight loss, cardiovascular and heart health. I am 35yrs T1 and enjoyed this course. I am also vegan already so that helped massively and ignited my interest to begin with. The recipes are very simple. Nothing very complicated at all. Some of the ingredients are not recognisable but google is always helpful for this. Not a good course if you can't live without meats and fats! My colesteral has gone down considerably and generally feel very healthy from this food.
What's the basis for this particular argument? Do they have data/studies that show this will happen?
I also presume you'd be training your body to be LESS sensitive to these carbs because if you were more sensitive your Blood Sugar would spike higher (requiring more Insulin to compensate)? Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean by sensitive.
You may benefit from looking at recent research into this. Low fat does not equal low cholesterol.Low fat equals low colesteral
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?