My understanding of "remission" is that my body is again able to efficient process the glucose properly
Fairly certain that would be considered a cure.
Here's the definition of remission copied from a dictionary
Remission noun (OF ILLNESS)
[ C or U ] formal
a period of time when an illness is less severe or is not affecting someone:
Way I see it is if I maintain non diabetic levels without medication by not eating carbs and avoid the possible consequences of high blood sugar. Then I am in remission.
If on the other hand I could eat anything at all and still have non diabetic levels. Then I would be cured, but unfortunately they haven't found a cure yet so I'll settle for remission.
Whilst I see your point almost every diabetic/medical organisation’s definition is some version of the latter. It is however widely misunderstood by the general public to mean the former. Which in my book is cure not remission.
Hence so much denial that remission is possible from some quarters - because currently cure is not possible. Equally why those that claim cure really mean remission.
I consider myself to have my diabetes in remission by the second definition - I can maintain my BG within normal levels by diet alone. In this way diabetes does not damage my body and there will be (hopefully!) no progressive deterioration. I think some members have suggested that their insulin resistance reduces over time with this approach, and they may be able to tolerate more carbs without raising their BG. And some few report that they are, in effect, cured, as per your first definition.
However I do not think that my mundane, straightforward T2 will ever be cured to the point I could resume eating high levels of carbs. Like a puppy, diabetes is for life, for most of us! However the damage potential of the disease can be mitigated to the point that it has no real impact but we remain vulnerable should something change to adversely affect our BG control, like medication for other issues or contracting other illnesses.
IMO worrying about remission or cure is just semantics, it’s more realistic to consider that you will always have a carb intolerance and behave accordingly.
A normal non-diabetic eats 300-350gs of carbs per day, has an A1c of 5.1% (33) & spends 97% of the day <7.8 (140).
I've found a few unicorns online claiming they can meet all 3 diagnostic criteria, FBG, A1c & OGTT, but none would claim an ability to eat 300gs of carbs with perfect numbers while sitting on their backside all day watching Netflix while munching on a share bag of Dorittos.
Lets face it, only 18% of the population are metabolically healthy, normal BP. BG & lipids.
The US & UK are looking at a third of the population being pre-diabetic or full blown today.
Estimates say that could be 50% by 2040, it's only going one way.
Remission, reversal . . . . cure ???
It's all a nonsense really, hyper insulin is the real enemy, we are tracking the wrong metric.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?