I HAVENT said that. I have recommended the message in Daisy1's post, which tells people to test. Do not put words into my mouth (or fingers)LOL that is brilliant coming from someone who has expressed their view that other forum members shouldn't be telling newcomers to test.
I HAVENT said that. I have recommended the message in Daisy1's post, which tells people to test. Do not put words into my mouth (or fingers)
That is one sentence, all one thought - the starting testing and stopping all staple starches all in one fell swoop. I apologise if I was unclear, I can see how this sentence could be read two ways.So you didn't post this?
The ones i am talking about start from saying you must test or you wont know what is what, and must stop all of the basic staple starches the person is eating.
That is not you telling other forum members what to write?
That is one sentence, all one thought - the starting testing and stopping all staple starches all in one fell swoop. I apologise if I was unclear, I can see how this sentence could be read two ways.
So you didn't post this?
The ones i am talking about start from saying you must test or you wont know what is what, and must stop all of the basic staple starches the person is eating.
That is not you telling other forum members what to write?
Ok, but in your original post you say we should not immediately tell newcomers about the benefits of a low-carb diet, but should wait "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them". Yet Daisy1's information packet for newcomers (often after just a few posts) clearly includes information on the benefits of a change in diet (i.e. reducing carb intake or trying low GI foods) on blood glucose levels, but no warnings about reducing carbs while on insulin or insulin affecting meds. Personally, I see no issue with the advice to type 2's on metformin only or no meds to eliminate all starchy carbs.As I understand it, her message is the "official" message given to people and consists of words like 'may' and 'some' and uses phrases like 'Different people respond differently to different types of food. What works for one person may not work so well for another. ' rather than the type of message which I am concerned about which tells people to ditch all starchy carbs, get down to below 50g or carbs or you will not be able to control you blood sugars. Can you see its the tone and black and whiteness that is the issue? It give a starting point for the reader to explore their own threshold and what effects it.
Lower carb and eliminating all starchy carbs are very far from being the same thingOk, but in your original post you say we should not immediately tell newcomers about the benefits of a low-carb diet, but should wait "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them". Yet Daisy1's information packet for newcomers (often after just a few posts) clearly includes information on the benefits of a change in diet (i.e. reducing carb intake or trying low GI foods) on blood glucose levels, but no warnings about reducing carbs while on insulin or insulin affecting meds. Personally, I see no issue with the advice to type 2's on metformin only or no meds to eliminate all starchy carbs.
I think that I see a difference between the approach in Daisy1's post and some of the other approaches. @Boo1979 said"I have no problem with people saying that a particular approach is helpful for a significant proportion of people with the particular type of diabetes under discussion as long as it is accompanied with the caveat that the approach wont necessarily work for everyone and there are other approaches to research / consider." and that is a far better way of expressing what i mean than my efforts seem to have been. So often that caveat is missing, as is the openness and encouragement for the newbie to test and explore for themselves, while also being informed of some options to try.Ok, but in your original post you say we should not immediately tell newcomers about the benefits of a low-carb diet, but should wait "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them". Yet Daisy1's information packet for newcomers (often after just a few posts) clearly includes information on the benefits of a change in diet (i.e. reducing carb intake or trying low GI foods) on blood glucose levels, but no warnings about reducing carbs while on insulin or insulin affecting meds. Personally, I see no issue with the advice to type 2's on metformin only or no meds to eliminate all starchy carbs.
I disagree. I think it is a well balanced over view, which opens up the concepts of self testing and experimenting with carb levels in a gentle way. Especially as many people have come straight from their GP's or other HCP having been told to eat lots of carbs and not to test.Perhaps daisy1's information post needs to be updated.
But surely if someone has already been given and started taking metformin or other drugs then fasting for 24 hours would be dangerous?
Ok, but your original post says we shouldn't give any dietary advice "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them" and that we should only provide "support" "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them." Yet you like daisy1's posts to newcomers that is heavy on dietary advice (despite no caveats about the dangers of reducing carbs while on insulin or insulin affecting meds) and light on support.I think that I see a difference between the approach in Daisy1's post and some of the other approaches. @Boo1979 said"I have no problem with people saying that a particular approach is helpful for a significant proportion of people with the particular type of diabetes under discussion as long as it is accompanied with the caveat that the approach wont necessarily work for everyone and there are other approaches to research / consider." and that is a far better way of expressing what i mean than my efforts seem to have been. So often that caveat is missing, as is the openness and encouragement for the newbie to test and explore for themselves, while also being informed of some options to try.
We suggest you fast for 24 hours, and use that time to google low carb diets, implementing the changes to your diet on recommencing eating.
No, there's no discussion of reducing carbs while on insulin or insulin affecting meds in daisy1's weclome post..The current @daisy message suggests low carb anyway across the entire forum. It needs to be crystal clear that because low carb has the same impact as taking medications, then doing both together without adjusting the drug regime is dangerous so changes need to be done in conjunction with your doctor. Haven't seen the @daisy message lately but I assume it references this somehow already as that is already true.
Yes, we personally shouldnt, which is why I also said that Daisy1 should be tagged and her advice be used. I disagree with your interpretation of @daisy1 's information.Ok, but your original post says we shouldn't give any dietary advice "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them" and that we should only provide "support" "until we know them better, know their situation more clearly, and have befriended them." Yet you like daisy1's posts to newcomers that is heavy on dietary advice (despite no caveats about the dangers of reducing carbs while on insulin or insulin affecting meds) and light on support.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?