When the local hospital got to hear that I am losing weight rapidly on a very careful low carbohydrate diet, they rang me up to see how I was getting along and wanted to check that I am getting 'all the nutrients'. I think I am -- green vegetables and about 50g of berries a day, all carefully weighed. Now they have followed it up with this pamphlet and I turned immediately to page seven which says how many carbs you should have a day. It is an amazing 130g minimum of carbs a day. Following this NHS pamphlet, published in 2016, would mean a reversion to eating some bread, cereals, potatoes etc. I have lost nearly 13 kg so far in less than three months by staying below 50g of carbs a day, though I am now losing only about 3.5 kg a month and am very satisfied with my general state of health and well-being. I accept their point about nutrients but I think I am taking good care of that. And I don't feel hungry.
My blood sugar levels have of course plunged to very very healthy ones and I am watching the protein content of my food, and am hopeful that my blood pressure is down too. They have never policed anything else that I have done -- and I would be grateful for more attention to my diabetes and blood pressure -- but now they seem to be doing exactly that in an attempt to have me eat carbohydrate I don't want. Can anyone think of a polite but crushing -- and completely science and research-based -- response to give when they ring up next and ask whether I am following their advice?
Thanks..very helpful. I use FatSecret which gives me a pretty good overall idea of how I am doing. And I do weight and record everything strictly. Is Cronometer better?Looking at my cronometer and eating about 30 -40 g carbs from a diverse range of vegetables , seeds, nuts and dairy, plus 50-70g proteins from a diverse set of met, fish,nuts seees and dairy and the balance fats weighted towards omega 3 , its quite easy to record nutrition t 90+% of daily nutrition requirements for me ( 5 ft 7 woman) without any supplements . if you want to check for yourself if you are missing anything essential or need to supplement anywhere you can download it for free. I can pretty much guarantee that the same number of calories with 130g carbs will leave you much more nutrient poor.
Thanks...no only the usual clutch of metabolic disorder-related diseases, which I mentioned, caused by serious obesity. But at a time when GPs are making us cut back on seeing consultants for anything but non-urgent purposes (I was seeinga cardiologist after a diabetes-related heart attack but when I admitted I was now doing fine, he said he was not allowed to see me again until 'something happened' and I went to A&E) it's extraordinary they waste time and money trying to push people to eat more carbohydrates. My GP sent me to see a dietitician some years back. Her main piece of advice was that I should reintroduce bread and grains to my diet. Needless to say I made no progress. Whereas with the LCHF diet, I am making good progress for the first time.
Do you have a URL reference for that report you mention? Thanks.
You could say that their advice would kill you, I suppose. Interesting that they've larches onto this, when you actually want proper diabetes care.When the local hospital got to hear that I am losing weight rapidly on a very careful low carbohydrate diet, they rang me up to see how I was getting along and wanted to check that I am getting 'all the nutrients'. I think I am -- green vegetables and about 50g of berries a day, all carefully weighed. Now they have followed it up with this pamphlet and I turned immediately to page seven which says how many carbs you should have a day. It is an amazing 130g minimum of carbs a day. Following this NHS pamphlet, published in 2016, would mean a reversion to eating some bread, cereals, potatoes etc. I have lost nearly 13 kg so far in less than three months by staying below 50g of carbs a day, though I am now losing only about 3.5 kg a month and am very satisfied with my general state of health and well-being. I accept their point about nutrients but I think I am taking good care of that. And I don't feel hungry.
My blood sugar levels have of course plunged to very very healthy ones and I am watching the protein content of my food, and am hopeful that my blood pressure is down too. They have never policed anything else that I have done -- and I would be grateful for more attention to my diabetes and blood pressure -- but now they seem to be doing exactly that in an attempt to have me eat carbohydrate I don't want. Can anyone think of a polite but crushing -- and completely science and research-based -- response to give when they ring up next and ask whether I am following their advice?
Thanks...no only the usual clutch of metabolic disorder-related diseases, which I mentioned, caused by serious obesity. But at a time when GPs are making us cut back on seeing consultants for anything but non-urgent purposes (I was seeinga cardiologist after a diabetes-related heart attack but when I admitted I was now doing fine, he said he was not allowed to see me again until 'something happened' and I went to A&E) it's extraordinary they waste time and money trying to push people to eat more carbohydrates. My GP sent me to see a dietitician some years back. Her main piece of advice was that I should reintroduce bread and grains to my diet. Needless to say I made no progress. Whereas with the LCHF diet, I am making good progress for the first time.
Do you have a URL reference for that report you mention? Thanks.
Thanks for posting.Its hard to find the report itself but this is from "The Lancet" so should hopefully carry some weight with your HCP's
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32252-3/abstract
Thanks..very helpful. I use FatSecret which gives me a pretty good overall idea of how I am doing. And I do weight and record everything strictly. Is Cronometer better?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?