It is due to be released over here in November.Listlad, I hope it's available to view in the UK. There's so many lessons in this film. And it provides so many powerful messages around restoring and rebuilding the soil. And the many, many contributors to that process. It begins with using cover crops...then introducing the animals... The process took 7 years...and the story continues...through their Facebook page...and I think a cookbook is coming too.
I hope your sister-in-law has the opportunity to view it too.
When provided with the choice Africans always favour animal protein over plants, especially in hunter gather scenarios. I have researched this loads due to my ancestry. Men would often prefer to go without tubers if meat was not available, in tribal scenarios. The Egyptians were different, quite grain based, and theirI think Bee Wilson would not argue with what you say about needing a specific diet (she is an omnivore herself) but what she does so well is put that into a global context.
She also uses the example you quote of people from the Indian sub continent being more predisposed to T2D because of undernourishment in the womb but highlights the fact that this is lack of food more than type of food consumed. Did you see the report about various poorer African countries having a healthier diet composition than the wealthy West? This analysed the type of foods eaten (usually vegetables) but acknowledged that people could still be undernourished because they didn't have enough to eat.
Plant-based eating would clearly feed more people on a global level but whether that would be a popular move is another matter altogether. I think it's called a 'wicked problem'.
If only we could time travel. Meet Grok:When provided with the choice Africans always favour animal protein over plants, especially in hunter gather scenarios. I have researched this loads due to my ancestry. Men would often prefer to go without tubers if meat was not available, in tribal scenarios. The Egyptians were different, quite grain based, and their
general health was terrible.
Interesting piece that does what many articles do for LCHF i.e. interject some truths to mask the criticism. One statement jumped out for me:If only we could time travel. Meet Grok:
How to Really Eat Like a Hunter-Gatherer: Why the Paleo Diet Is Half-Baked
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-paleo-diet-half-baked-how-hunter-gatherer-really-eat/
I came into lchf with no vested interest or bias. I still look at it in the same way. I simply apply it to my needs.Interesting piece that does what many articles do for LCHF i.e. interject some truths to mask the criticism. One statement jumped out for me:
"....by denying the benefits of some of our more modern methods of eating"
There is nothing I can think of in modern times that is better; fruit has been turned into a sugar bomb, poultry is fattened so quickly most cannot stand, beef etc is being either completely feed on grains or finished on this stuff, there are over 600,000 supermarket items - 80% of which have added sugar, bread is meant to have 4 ingredients, mainstream has up to 21, the western diet exported to other countries always = metabolic syndrome. I could fill the entire forum.
The article refers to Mr Mark Sissons, what a legend, A1C of 4.6 at 66 and a 6 pack physique....who should I listen too.
I believe that the hunter gather types of diet are how we are templated to eat. For me this is an animal based protein everyday with the natural fat, so either fish or meat, seasonal honey or berries and natural tubers. Depending on the part of the world eggs as well. I watch recent TV programmes and see how persons in the Croatian mountains eat, those in the Amazon and the like, always quality absorbable protein at the centre and no candy shop garbage. I think our pancreas can cope with whole food starches, in this manner.I came into lchf with no vested interest or bias. I still look at it in the same way. I simply apply it to my needs.
Hunter gatherers on the whole ate both meat and grains etc. I can’t see anything wrong in that. It’s what has happened since that has been the problem, as you said.
Sure. We have had a carbohydrate explosion in recent times. Not good.I believe that the hunter gather types of diet are how we are templated to eat. For me this is an animal based protein everyday with the natural fat, so either fish or meat, seasonal honey or berries and natural tubers. Depending on the part of the world eggs as well. I watch recent TV programmes and see how persons in the Croatian mountains eat, those in the Amazon and the like, always quality absorbable protein at the centre and no candy shop garbage. I think our pancreas can cope with whole food starches, in this manner.
The modern stuff, for me breaks our systems which makes even quality starches "bad" to many of us. Just my theory.
I think you'll find they ate meat and "etc".. very few grains which were cultivated from grass seeds..Hunter gatherers on the whole ate both meat and grains etc
There are a number of reliable sources that differ on that. I wouldn’t use a Diabetes forum to find out about what ancient man ate in the same way that I wouldn’t approach an archaeologist about diabetes. I think I said before, no need to pump up lchf as it stands well enough on its own, without adding fairy stories to embellish it.I think you'll find they ate meat and "etc".. very few grains which were cultivated from grass seeds..
I don't think many HG's eat those..
And from the National Geographic:Interesting piece that does what many articles do for LCHF i.e. interject some truths to mask the criticism. One statement jumped out for me:
"....by denying the benefits of some of our more modern methods of eating"
There is nothing I can think of in modern times that is better; fruit has been turned into a sugar bomb, poultry is fattened so quickly most cannot stand, beef etc is being either completely feed on grains or finished on this stuff, there are over 600,000 supermarket items - 80% of which have added sugar, bread is meant to have 4 ingredients, mainstream has up to 21, the western diet exported to other countries always = metabolic syndrome. I could fill the entire forum.
The article refers to Mr Mark Sissons, what a legend, A1C of 4.6 at 66 and a 6 pack physique....who should I listen too.
More give with 1 hand take with the other. Again red meat causing cancer....strange that in the same article they effectively say meat heavy tribes have no non-communicable diseases including Type 2 or heart disease (this is what my research turns up all of the time), as well as clear observational evidence say in Britain say in 1960, or take any snapshot pre-1980. I know the absolute risk for cancer and processed and red meat, maximal 1.2 when smoking relates to cancer at 20 - 30; I think again 30% of this article I can file under "the bin", talk about trying to have your cake and eat it on the facts. Meat eaters dying at 45, really, when the longest lived in Hong Kong are double that and some...yawn.And from the National Geographic:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/foodfeatures/evolution-of-diet/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?