I think you'll have to test bg spike with 3, 4 and 5 @Antje77 so it's a fair experiment, depending on people's appetite!! More plum buying!!
Ah, but it's not an experiment to see how many I can handle. If I wanted to try that I'd take insulin for them and see what would happen.Surely if the 4 are 200g, the obvious is to test 2, thereby getting a figure per 100g. Then depending on results you will know how many you can handle.
I'd kick off with two plums, but it is your decision, Anje.Ah, but it's not an experiment to see how many I can handle. If I wanted to try that I'd take insulin for them and see what would happen.
It's about the part in the opening post saying: "Plums do not cause a big spike in blood sugar."
@Pura Vida said in a later post that they only eat berries, so I thought it was time for someone to do some testing to see if anything can be learned about the original statement.
It's very noble of you, it must be said, to undertake this experiment on our behalf!
Well, seeing as I can't make myself useful for all of you as a moderator anymore now my stint as a mod is over, I just had to find another way to be of use. And what better way than eating plums!As a type 2 diet controlled, it would be very beneficial to all type 2s, and i can only commend you for the personal sacrifice you are going to put yourself through.
Dynamite the tree, then the plums come to you, and the birds get scared away.All the fruits - yes a big loss becoming a low-carber post diagnosis. It took me a while to let go of them. And I haven't entirely as I portion control one per season/year off of my own trees, including a plum. Or two.
But saying that, the idea that high-carbohyrdrate food of any kind can help lower your blood glucoe - what a hoot! What they should say is, some foods and some fruit, in this case plums, can take a while to digest and depending on how good (or how bad of course) your blood glucose regulation system is is what kind of spike or nae, one can get from it. But too detailed for mass education? But true, no? And there is that double whammy of effect that fruit has - with fructose and sucrose, so depends on how your liver is doing with shunting out lots of glucose or nae.
Gee, it sounds kinda complex doesn't it? Hmmmm - yes indeedy. So we get back to individual responses with eating and metering to check out one's individual blood glucose/insulin response....as said above and too right.
But interesting that plums have a relatively low carb level (the 10g per 100g) - we should see more diabetic-friendly (called 'keto' nowadays, no?) plum jams? Hmmmm - I would love that. Plum chutneys? Oh goodness. Sounds wonderful. But I think I may have to make them myself, groan, and fight with the birds when it comes to getting those plums before they do...
Might be ideal for a “ free pick”. Here, if you have fruit trees or bushes you can sign them up for a volunteer to pick. The owner retains 1/3 of what’s picked, the volunteer receives 1/3 and a food bank the remaining 1/3. Although one of the reasons is to prevent bears coming down and helping themselves which might not be a problem for youI'll have the raspberries and blackberries that the birds don't get to. Plums are just way too sweet - I'm wouldn't even bother to test. The apples will see a lot of birds and our resident hedgehogs through the winter.
Experimental data in the form of 'pudding' will be provided tomorrow, even if N is only 1.The OP reads like a typical Year 1 postgrad starting a Masters Degree. It is a list of statements of fact, without the experimental data to back them up. so it is actually conjecture and possible groundwork for a project or a thesis. It is the sort of thing postgrads do while trying to get funding to support their Masters Degree. I suspect it is a paper seeking funding at this stage. The proof is in the pudding.
That's absolutely amazing, and not unlike my incomplete experiment with dried plums a couple years back.I succumbed and ordered some plums - a small pack of six from the supermarket. I ate two, chopped with a bit of stevia thrown in, and not much else for a rather mini lunch - result: glucose levels increased from pre meal 6 to post meal 6.4... I think plums might actually like me!![]()
![]()
I'm on the edge of my seat here. I used to love plums as a kid... Wouldn't mind if they were back on the menu! Good luck, Antje.That's absolutely amazing, and not unlike my incomplete experiment with dried plums a couple years back.
I'm having my fingers crossed for a similar result for me!
I'm sorry, plums are not back on the menu. (Unless you ever go on gliclazide again and need to treat a hypo.)I'm on the edge of my seat here. I used to love plums as a kid... Wouldn't mind if they were back on the menu! Good luck, Antje.![]()
I thought it was too much to hope for. Ah well, I do hope you enjoyed them!I'm sorry, plums are not back on the menu. (Unless you ever go on gliclazide again and need to treat a hypo.)
Will post full report in an hour or so, but preliminary results are pretty clear.