First comment: They do not specify what fasting was done before the OGTTs. Second comment, they used an electronic glucometer, type unspecified, to measure the bgl. So immediately invalidateds the OGTT as a source of 'proof' since we know that this technique immediately introduces the possibility of a +/- 15% error between consecutive readings, We must presume that the graphs show an averged value for the group, but it is not stated. They should have used venous blood draw to measure the glucose levels and a reference analyser to assay it. These methodology error invalidates this trial.
They do not state at what time the water or onion were administered, and this will require time to be assimilated (digested) before becoming active.
There is no comment about the ingestion of the onion possibly affecting the digestion of the glucose trigger. The idea of the OGTT is the step kickstart shock, and the onion or water will affect that if taken at time 0. We do see a rise in BGL at time 1hr in the fasting test which shows that the carb content is significant. (100g is not LC)
I do not believe the onion is reducing glucose in the blood. I think it may be preventing absorbtion and thereby blunting the effect of the OGTT.
I am not a T1D but I would be worried about giving that group such a severe shock. There is no mention of how this group were protected i.e. did they use a bolus for 75g carb,
Speaking of carb content, the test organisers have used dextrose not anhydrous glucose as the test stimulus. They should have upped the dose to 82.5g to compensate for the difference in GI.