DavidGorman
Member
I have just had my diabetic meeting for results of my HbA1c and it was 27, compared to last November it was 69, to say the least I'm Chuffed to bits, smashed it out of the park. Go LCHF
I have just had my diabetic meeting for results of my HbA1c and it was 27, compared to last November it was 69, to say the least I'm Chuffed to bits, smashed it out of the park. Go LCHF
What's wrong with it being this low for a T2. He does not have insulin to help presumably so I think it is a major achievement.A very good figure.
(Way too low for me personally, but very respectable if you can mange that low a blood glucose, we just had this discussion on another thread)
I have just had my diabetic meeting for results of my HbA1c and it was 27, compared to last November it was 69, to say the least I'm Chuffed to bits, smashed it out of the park. Go LCHF
What's wrong with it being this low for a T2. He does not have insulin to help presumably so I think it is a major achievement.
I don't define myself at a 'T2'
There is more to my life than labeling myself T2.
You need to look beyond that to define yourself.
I merely state it's too low for me.
Which it is.
But since you ask.
A Hba1c of that level means a BG of averaging 4.7.
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/hba1c-to-blood-sugar-level-converter.html
It may not be a popular view, but I don't feel good below 4.5, so an average of 4.7 would be really bad.
For me. (Some may define themselves by chasing the lowest figures, I don't, been there, don't like it)
Either I'd be chronically low a lot of the time, or I wouldn't eat anything that raises me even slightly, and that's way to limiting for my lifestyle.
I don't chase low numbers.
However, the op must be comfortable at that level, hence my statement its a good figure for him.
My average is in the 5's, which I personally like.
That's fantastic news! Well done.I have just had my diabetic meeting for results of my HbA1c and it was 27, compared to last November it was 69, to say the least I'm Chuffed to bits, smashed it out of the park. Go LCHF
Obviously, as an adult you can choose to manage your condition in any way you please.
Personally, I applaud the OP's achievement. Again, personally, I have never quite managed to squeak into the 20s, but would be fine with it if I did, provided I felt well, and my metabolic markers remained good.. My bloods run, to quote your words, "chronically low" for most of the time. It seems to be where my body likes to run these days.
My current HbA1c history is up to date. I eat well. I eat an extremely varied diet, and I'm content how I am. One man's too low, is another's doing fine. I prefer to stick with the positive, on a day the OP is clearly celebrating his positive changes, as indeed he should.
Are you not in the 20's?
Your normal BG seems to suggest you should be?
Do you wonder why your Hb1ac is high?
It has never been an extremely close match. Again, it just seems to be the way of me.
I was referring to the OP, it's his thread after all.I don't define myself at a 'T2'
There is more to my life than labeling myself T2.
You need to look beyond that to define yourself.
I merely state it's too low for me.
Which it is.
But since you ask.
A Hba1c of that level means a BG of averaging 4.7.
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/hba1c-to-blood-sugar-level-converter.html
It may not be a popular view, but I don't feel good below 4.5, so an average of 4.7 would be really bad.
For me. (Some may define themselves by chasing the lowest figures, I don't, been there, don't like it)
Either I'd be chronically low a lot of the time, or I wouldn't eat anything that raises me even slightly, and that's way to limiting for my lifestyle.
I don't chase low numbers.
However, the op must be comfortable at that level, hence my statement its a good figure for him.
My average is in the 5's, which I personally like.