- Messages
- 4,073
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Not necessarily. You don't know what's happening when you don't test. The whole blood glucose thing is a bit more complex than what you've just eaten. I found it impossible to "average" fingerprick results and predict A1c - it will give you direction of travel but as the two tests measure different things any estimate is just that, and it depends on the quality of the information - you might be testing (extreme case) only highs or only lows, etc.Ok folks, Nandos, half chicken, chips and coleslaw, pre reading 6.0, 2hr 8.2 and 3 hrs 5.2
Same as yesterday with toastie, between the 2-3 hour mark it comes down like a sledge hammer, any conclusions from this? Is it my body is slow to respond but it eventually it gets there an hour latter? Also that is my only meal now as I had breakfast so be in the 4s all day now and during the night before I wake up so will the avergae of the Ac1 be ok? Or am i inflicting damage on my body with these high no's (or are they not that high?)
Even if (maybe particularly if) you don't eat your liver may well still be adding glucose to your system via gluconeogenesis. IIRC most livers store enough glucose for around 2000 calories of energy. If you've not depleted these stores your liver will ensure you use them by dumping them in your blood.
Personal example, info from CGM: Starting from a 7pm BG of 4.7, I eat resulting in a BG 5.3 by 9pm. Go to bed midnight with a BG of 5.0. BG falls steadily through the night to 4.3 at 4am, liver starts dumping glucose and BG starts rising to 5.3 by 7am, 5.8 by 10am, and 6.2 by 1pm. That is ups and downs on no food for 18 hours. Eat a small piece of cheese at 1pm, liver is happy, stops adding glucose, BG 4.9 by 3pm.
If you're interested then you might find using a CGM for a couple of weeks answers some of your questions.