HpprKM said:
Food manufacturers using less sugar.
I don't think anyone could argue with that. If you look at the amount of sugar that is used in every processed product it is astonishing. And the reason - primarily two reasons:
- sugar is a relatively cheap bulking agent, you can reduce the costly nutritious ingredients and substitute with a cheaper alternative;
- sugar is incredibly addictive - it triggers production of high amounts of seratonin in the brain, and seratonin itself makes you crave more sugar! Manufacturers add more sugar in order to get customers hooked on their product over that of a rival, so the rival ups their sugar content . . and so it goes on.
I have recently returned from a trip to Canada . . . . I was quite surprised to find some many nice things available to eat for diabetics. For starters they have ice cream using sweeters instead of sugar, biscuits (would you believe Peek Frean no longer avaliable in UK) that have some really good ingredients health wise and no sugar, and I found a most delicious line in chocolate sweets in the drug store!
Canada and the USA by no means dominate the market in confectionary for diabetics. Boots sell a whole range of "diabetic" foods, as do many of the supermarket chains and chocolatiers. They nearly all have one thing in common, the sugar substitute is invariably one of the polyols, sorbitol or maltitol, two of the most powerful laxatives known to man! They are also advertised as being sugar-free, which is technically correct. Polyols are not sugar (sucrose) but they are sugar alcohols, and will raise blood sugar although not by as much as sugar does. If you get hooked on them just don't stray too far from a loo!!