There are regular outbreaks of high fat/low fat and high carb/low carb skirmishes on this forum. Here are my thoughts.
To me it matters not what this survey or another survey says, the only correct course is what works for you, or in this case me.
I joined this forum when the blurry vision and extreme pain in my fingers, tendons and feet was getting frightening. This in turn, led me to question the standard diet that's churned out by the NHS professionals. Against my GP's advice I started testing and was appalled at the readings. Almost any carb whether high GI or low GI sent my BG soaring. Just 3 Nairns Oatcakes took me to 10.8 after 1 hour and 9.9 after 2. Fasting was never less than 8.
Having read everything I could both here and in a number of controversial books, I started low carbing and it worked. My fasting BG is around 6.1 and 2 hours after a meal it's between 5.6 and 6.8. My vision has cleared and my pains have gone!
Just because advice has been around for 20 years or more does not make it right.
My late father-in-law was fond of telling anyone who'd listen (he was skilled at emptying a room!) that Pirrelli tyres were the very best available. Why? He apparently bought some in 1936 and they lasted longer than others he'd bought. Why he thought the quality was the same in 1997 was never explained. To me, this is the same thinking that pollutes discussions on diet.
Am I running a risk by following a high fat/low carb diet? I don't think so judging from the evidence I've seen. But, I would be running one hell of a risk if I'd followed the "healthcare professional's" advice and continued allowing by BG to run riot. As I said elsewhere on this forum, you don't put a fire out by pouring petrol on it. However, I am aware that some happily follow the standard diet without problems. I am certain though, there are thousands who are consigning themselves to a horrible future by toeing the line without question.
Ray
To me it matters not what this survey or another survey says, the only correct course is what works for you, or in this case me.
I joined this forum when the blurry vision and extreme pain in my fingers, tendons and feet was getting frightening. This in turn, led me to question the standard diet that's churned out by the NHS professionals. Against my GP's advice I started testing and was appalled at the readings. Almost any carb whether high GI or low GI sent my BG soaring. Just 3 Nairns Oatcakes took me to 10.8 after 1 hour and 9.9 after 2. Fasting was never less than 8.
Having read everything I could both here and in a number of controversial books, I started low carbing and it worked. My fasting BG is around 6.1 and 2 hours after a meal it's between 5.6 and 6.8. My vision has cleared and my pains have gone!
Just because advice has been around for 20 years or more does not make it right.
My late father-in-law was fond of telling anyone who'd listen (he was skilled at emptying a room!) that Pirrelli tyres were the very best available. Why? He apparently bought some in 1936 and they lasted longer than others he'd bought. Why he thought the quality was the same in 1997 was never explained. To me, this is the same thinking that pollutes discussions on diet.
Am I running a risk by following a high fat/low carb diet? I don't think so judging from the evidence I've seen. But, I would be running one hell of a risk if I'd followed the "healthcare professional's" advice and continued allowing by BG to run riot. As I said elsewhere on this forum, you don't put a fire out by pouring petrol on it. However, I am aware that some happily follow the standard diet without problems. I am certain though, there are thousands who are consigning themselves to a horrible future by toeing the line without question.
Ray