There are newspapers in the UK (and I'm sure elsewhere around the world) that are just not, well, true. These are the types of papers who ran mock-up reproductions of Iraqi hostage abuse (Piers Morgan now making lots of money in the US - seems to be where our disgraced and besmirched go these days), who ran stories based on hacking the answerphones of murder victims and their families, and who will "pay" for their news (though, hahaha Max Clifford).
I found a relatively interesting article that reports the results of a survey carried out on UK media. Some of the results may surprise Brits!
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/faceb...daily-star-according-bbc-commissioned-survey/
The Star, The Sun, The Mirror, The People, The Mail... not worth wrapping bones for the dog in, frankly. They employ hacks and ghouls, often at the behest of massive media moguls with their fingers in lots of special pies (Murdoch, eg). These are the people who will run pictures of dying children and call it "news", who will attack before they question, who believe setting people against each other is the way to sell lots and lots of copy. What's funny is they probably outsell some of the other titles higher in the list 2:1, and yet they rank at the bottom, so you gotta wonder why anyone buys them.
It surprised me that Huffington came so low. Then again, I guess people can't tell if they're being serious or not, but they've broken some seriously important stories in the past (It was them, surprisingly, who broken some of the Trump - Putin stories, e.g. NYT and Wash Post picked them up after the fact) I guess they're just not so familiar to us Brits.
Anyway. Sorry. As an aside: A quick walkthrough of UK media.
As for fish? Tinned tuna because it's cheap and easy. I mix it with enormous amounts of mayo, and then fold in some raw onion, sliced olives, tiny bits of cucumber (when I can be bothered) and dump the lot on a spinach salad dressed with lime juice and sesame oil.
Beyond that, not a fish fan.