My first hello on this forum. I was diagnosed with type 2 approximately four years ago and put on metformin 500 twice a day. After weight loss and this med, my blood test showed constantly good results. So much so that my GP experimented by taking me off all meds for a couple of months. However his hunch that I could beat Type 2 was wrong and I had to return to Metformin. I have recently changed again onto taking 40mg GLICLAZIDE after having declared that I was fed up with the bloating and gas I experienced on the years of Metformin. I am wondering now if the fact that Gliclazide gives me unpleasant symptoms if I go too long without a meal and also that I don't seem to be able to lose weight is soon going to force me to return to Metformin.
Anyone else have any similar tales?
I have recently changed again onto taking 40mg GLICLAZIDE after having declared that I was fed up with the bloating and gas I experienced on the years of Metformin. I am wondering now if the fact that Gliclazide gives me unpleasant symptoms if I go too long without a meal and also that I don't seem to be able to lose weight is soon going to force me to return to Metformin.
Anyone else have any similar tales?
Hi - yes the symptoms that appear are a physical shaky feeling anxiety and mild dizziness occasionally a headacheWhen you write ' if I go too long without a meal ' - do you mean that you are becomng hypoglyceamic?
Hi - yes the symptoms that appear are a physical shaky feeling anxiety and mild dizziness occasionally a headache
I have not personally taken gliclazide (or any of the other sulfonylureas) - and my doctor would need to do a lot of arm twisting to get me to. Just to get my biases out there up front.
Our healthy glucose metabolism is a perfectly balanced on-demand system. When carbohydrates come in, your body takes stock and says, "Hmm . . . I need X quantity of insulin to help transport that glucose where it needs to go, and pumps out quantity X pretty much instantaneously to pair with the glucose and transport it across the blood vessel walls so it can go where it is needed to provide energy. When you are insulin resistant (Type 2, primarily), your body may well send out quantity X of insulin but insulin resistance means that it doesn't work very well. As a result the glucose increases in the bloodstream faster than the insulin can remove it (the spikes) - and it takes longer to clean up the remnants (dropping to your baseline much more slowly). When you are insulin insufficient (Type 1, from the start, and often Type 2 in later stages), your body may know you need quantity X, but it isn't able to produce it, so it sends out less (or none at all) to pair with the glucose.
Either way the quantity of glucose overwhelms the insulin - because the insulin doesn't work well or there isn't enough of it, or both.
Metformin works on insulin resistance (although our understanding of exactly how it does that is changing). It makes the insulin we have work better.
Sulfonylureas work on the opposite end of the problem by coaxing the pancreas to make and secrete insulin.
You'd think both would solve the problem - but there are risks associated with having too much insulin (added insulin or the sulfonylureas) that are non-existent with medications that merely make the insulin that is present work more efficiently (like Metformin). Because our natural insulin production system is an on-demand system, a "dumb" system that continuously adds insulin even when there are no carbs coming in is not the best substitute. When the added insulin (produced continuously - rather than on-demand) does what it does best - helping the glucose out of the bloodstream to where it is needed for energy, it can take too much out. The "dumb" steady-state secretion system doesn't understand that your blood glucose is not intended to go below a certain level. It's like the old (US?) joke about the boy scout helping a resistant little old lady across the road - it just keeps helping the blood glucose across the road (blood vessel walls), whether it needs/wants to go or not. The result can be a hypo. Just guessing from the timing of your side effects that that might be what you're talking about.
Of course, if hypos aren't the unpleasant side effects you're experiencing, feel free to ignore this post
Do you check your blood sugars when this happens, if so what are your readings?
I can't understand this mania doctors have with taking people off a medication which is clearly working. Gliclazide is a Sulfonylurea which, as I understand it, stimulates the pancreas to produce more insulin. More insulin often means weight gain. It is not recommended by Dr Bernstein because it is obviously forcing an already damaged pancreas to produce more insulin. In doing so it may accelerate beta cell burn out. And weight gain will increase insulin resistance. There is supposed to be an increased heart attack risk with this type of drug too. It does not appear to have much to recommend it. Jason Fung actually suggets SGLT2, acarbose and metformin in that order. Of course, Sulfonylureas are cheap, but I am sure that that in no way influences the decision to prescribe them.My first hello on this forum. I was diagnosed with type 2 approximately four years ago and put on metformin 500 twice a day. After weight loss and this med, my blood test showed constantly good results. So much so that my GP experimented by taking me off all meds for a couple of months. However his hunch that I could beat Type 2 was wrong and I had to return to Metformin. I have recently changed again onto taking 40mg GLICLAZIDE after having declared that I was fed up with the bloating and gas I experienced on the years of Metformin. I am wondering now if the fact that Gliclazide gives me unpleasant symptoms if I go too long without a meal and also that I don't seem to be able to lose weight is soon going to force me to return to Metformin.
Anyone else have any similar tales?
I can't understand this mania doctors have with taking people off a medication which is clearly working. Gliclazide is a Sulfonylurea which, as I understand it, stimulates the pancreas to produce more insulin. More insulin often means weight gain. It is not recommended by Dr Bernstein because it is obviously forcing an already damaged pancreas to produce more insulin. In doing so it may accelerate beta cell burn out. And weight gain will increase insulin resistance. There is supposed to be an increased heart attack risk with this type of drug too. It does not appear to have much to recommend it. Jason Fung actually suggets SGLT2, acarbose and metformin in that order. Of course, Sulfonylureas are cheap, but I am sure that that in no way influences the decision to prescribe them.
Many thanks I will definitely go back to the GP and request to return to Metformin SR.OK after reading the replies you have got I have a couple of things to add. Go back to the GP or dsn and ask for 2 things
1 ask to go on to SR meformin as this will help with the wind and bloated feeling.
2 if you stick with the gliclizide ask for a meter and test strips being as gliclizide causes hypo's you have to test your blood sugar. If they refuse tell them that you are concerned about having a hypo whilst driving. There are legal requirements when it comes to this
many thanks - my instincts, the constant tiredness and what sometimes seemed like day long hunger pangs and the 'scales' creeping upward have all convinced me that you are right. I have an appointment next week, but in the meantime I have commited one of the ultimate 'sins' as a patient. I still had a fairly new supply of Metformin SL so you can guess what I've done! I am not prepared to spend even another week worrying about how long it is since I have eaten each day and CERTAINLY not going to continue watching the pounds that I shed creep back on!Hi @actsing, from my own personal experience I can confirm that gliclazide can cause hypos and weight gain.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?